Literature DB >> 26166904

Optimal retesting configurations for hierarchical group testing.

Michael S Black1, Christopher R Bilder2, Joshua M Tebbs3.   

Abstract

Hierarchical group testing is widely used to test individuals for diseases. This testing procedure works by first amalgamating individual specimens into groups for testing. Groups testing negatively have their members declared negative. Groups testing positively are subsequently divided into smaller subgroups and are then retested to search for positive individuals. In our paper, we propose a new class of informative retesting procedures for hierarchical group testing that acknowledges heterogeneity among individuals. These procedures identify the optimal number of groups and their sizes at each testing stage in order to minimize the expected number of tests. We apply our proposals in two settings: 1) HIV testing programs that currently use three-stage hierarchical testing and 2) chlamydia and gonorrhea screening practices that currently use individual testing. For both applications, we show that substantial savings can be realized by our new procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; HIV; Infertility Prevention Project; Informative retesting; Pooled testing; Retesting

Year:  2015        PMID: 26166904      PMCID: PMC4495770          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error.

Authors:  Hae-Young Kim; Michael G Hudgens; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Daniel J Westreich; Christopher D Pilcher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Two-dimensional informative array testing.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cost savings and increased efficiency using a stratified specimen pooling strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Joanna Lynn Lewis; Vivian Marie Lockary; Sadika Kobic
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Informative Dorfman screening.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

6.  Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-09

7.  Three-dimensional array-based group testing algorithms.

Authors:  Hae-Young Kim; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Group testing in heterogeneous populations by using halving algorithms.

Authors:  Michael S Black; Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 9.  Introduction of Chlamydia trachomatis screening for young women in Germany.

Authors:  Monika Mund; Gabriele Sander; Peter Potthoff; Helga Schicht; Katja Matthias
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.584

10.  The use of pooled viral load testing to identify antiretroviral treatment failure.

Authors:  Davey M Smith; Susanne J May; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Matthew C Strain; Caroline C Ignacio; Richard H Haubrich; Douglas D Richman; Constance A Benson; Susan J Little
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.177

View more
  10 in total

1.  Bayesian regression for group testing data.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Timothy E Hanson; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The objective function controversy for group testing: Much ado about nothing?

Authors:  Brianna D Hitt; Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher S McMahan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Simulation of group testing scenarios can boost COVID-19 screening power.

Authors:  Vinicius Henrique da Silva; Carolina Purcell Goes; Priscila Anchieta Trevisoli; Raquel Lello; Luan Gaspar Clemente; Talita Bonato de Almeida; Juliana Petrini; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Multi-Stage Group Testing Improves Efficiency of Large-Scale COVID-19 Screening.

Authors:  J N Eberhardt; N P Breuckmann; C S Eberhardt
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Sample pooling is a viable strategy for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low-prevalence settings.

Authors:  Brian S W Chong; Thomas Tran; Julian Druce; Susan A Ballard; Julie A Simpson; Mike Catton
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.306

6.  Pooling for SARS-CoV2 Surveillance: Validation and Strategy for Implementation in K-12 Schools.

Authors:  Alexandra M Simas; Jimmy W Crott; Chris Sedore; Augusta Rohrbach; Anthony P Monaco; Stacey B Gabriel; Niall Lennon; Brendan Blumenstiel; Caroline A Genco
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-17

7.  Safe and effective pool testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Authors:  Marie Wunsch; Dominik Aschemeier; Eva Heger; Denise Ehrentraut; Jan Krüger; Martin Hufbauer; Adnan S Syed; Gibran Horemheb-Rubio; Felix Dewald; Irina Fish; Maike Schlotz; Henning Gruell; Max Augustin; Clara Lehmann; Rolf Kaiser; Elena Knops; Steffi Silling; Florian Klein
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Group testing via hypergraph factorization applied to COVID-19.

Authors:  David Hong; Rounak Dey; Xihong Lin; Brian Cleary; Edgar Dobriban
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Smart pooling: AI-powered COVID-19 informative group testing.

Authors:  María Escobar; Guillaume Jeanneret; Laura Bravo-Sánchez; Angela Castillo; Catalina Gómez; Diego Valderrama; Mafe Roa; Julián Martínez; Jorge Madrid-Wolff; Martha Cepeda; Marcela Guevara-Suarez; Olga L Sarmiento; Andrés L Medaglia; Manu Forero-Shelton; Mauricio Velasco; Juan M Pedraza; Rachid Laajaj; Silvia Restrepo; Pablo Arbelaez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Network-Informed Constrained Divisive Pooled Testing Assignments.

Authors:  Daniel K Sewell
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-07-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.