Literature DB >> 17638502

The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.

Peter Juslin1, Anders Winman, Patrik Hansson.   

Abstract

The perspective of the naïve intuitive statistician is outlined and applied to explain overconfidence when people produce intuitive confidence intervals and why this format leads to more overconfidence than other formally equivalent formats. The naïve sampling model implies that people accurately describe the sample information they have but are naïve in the sense that they uncritically take sample properties as estimates of population properties. A review demonstrates that the naïve sampling model accounts for the robust and important findings in previous research as well as provides novel predictions that are confirmed, including a way to minimize the overconfidence with interval production. The authors discuss the naïve sampling model as a representative of models inspired by the naïve intuitive statistician. Copyright 2007 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638502     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  8 in total

1.  A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment.

Authors:  Uriel Haran; Don A Moore; Carey K Morewedge
Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak       Date:  2010-12

2.  Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Florent Meyniel; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social sampling and expressed attitudes: Authenticity preference and social extremeness aversion lead to social norm effects and polarization.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; Stephan Lewandowsky; Zhihong Huang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Are Experts Well-Calibrated? An Equivalence-Based Hypothesis Test.

Authors:  Gayan Dharmarathne; Anca M Hanea; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2015

6.  Toward a general theoretical framework for judgment and decision-making.

Authors:  Davide Marchiori; Itzhak Aharon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-17

7.  Does the implicit models of leadership influence the scanning of other-race faces in adults?

Authors:  Iain L Densten; Luc Borrowman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Are all data created equal?--Exploring some boundary conditions for a lazy intuitive statistician.

Authors:  Marcus Lindskog; Anders Winman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.