| Literature DB >> 28403191 |
Inga Schlecht1, Wolfram Gronwald2, Gundula Behrens1, Sebastian E Baumeister1,3, Johannes Hertel4, Jochen Hochrein2, Helena U Zacharias2, Beate Fischer1, Peter J Oefner2, Michael F Leitzmann1.
Abstract
Obesity is a complex multifactorial phenotype that influences several metabolic pathways. Yet, few studies have examined the relations of different body fat compartments to urinary and serum metabolites. Anthropometric phenotypes (visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), the ratio between VAT and SAT (VSR), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC)) and urinary and serum metabolite concentrations measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were measured in a population-based sample of 228 healthy adults. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models, corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate, were used to associate anthropometric phenotypes with metabolites. We adjusted for potential confounding variables: age, sex, smoking, physical activity, menopausal status, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary glucose, and fasting status. In a fully adjusted logistic regression model dichotomized for the absence or presence of quantifiable metabolite amounts, VAT, BMI and WC were inversely related to urinary choline (ß = -0.18, p = 2.73*10-3), glycolic acid (ß = -0.20, 0.02), and guanidinoacetic acid (ß = -0.12, p = 0.04), and positively related to ethanolamine (ß = 0.18, p = 0.02) and dimethylamine (ß = 0.32, p = 0.02). BMI and WC were additionally inversely related to urinary glutamine and lactic acid. Moreover, WC was inversely associated with the detection of serine. VAT, but none of the other anthropometric parameters, was related to serum essential amino acids, such as valine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine among men. Compared to other adiposity measures, VAT demonstrated the strongest and most significant relations to urinary and serum metabolites. The distinct relations of VAT, SAT, VSR, BMI, and WC to metabolites emphasize the importance of accurately differentiating between body fat compartments when evaluating the potential role of metabolic regulation in the development of obesity-related diseases, such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28403191 PMCID: PMC5389790 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the study population by sex.
| Total mean (SD) | Women mean (SD) | Men mean (SD) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 228 | 121 | 107 | |
| Age | 51.96 (12.55) | 52.80 (12.00) | 50.97 (13.15) | 0.388 |
| Non-fasting | 198 | 105 | 93 | 0.511 |
| Current smoking | 31 | 12 | 19 | 0.075 |
| Physical activity level | 1.67 (0.27) | 1.67 (0.27) | 1.68 (0.28) | 0.888 |
| VAT thickness US (cm) | 6.79 (2.85) | 6.29 (2.80) | 7.38 (2.81) | <0.001 |
| SAT thickness US (cm) | 2.06 (0.85) | 2.17 (0.89) | 1.93 (0.78) | 0.011 |
| VSR | 3.77 (2.14) | 3.23 (1.70) | 4.41 (2.41) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.61 (4.66) | 25.97 (4.99) | 27.36 (4.13) | 0.008 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 91.16 (13.56) | 85.53 (11.99) | 97.75 (12.30) | <0.001 |
Entries are mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and absolute numbers for categorical variables. VAT = visceral adipose tissue, SAT = subcutaneous adipose tissue, BMI = body mass index, US = ultrasonography, n = 228. p-value from Kruskal-Wallis test.
*Calculated from Metabolic Equivalents of Task.
Significant associations between measures of obesity and urinary metabolite levels.
| Metabolite | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ß | p | ß | p | |||
| VAT | Formic acid | -0.09 | 4.81 | -0.07 | 0.19 | |
| Choline | -0.12 | 5.26 | -0.18 | 2.73 | ||
| Methanol | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.29 | ||
| Ethanolamine | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.02 | ||
| Dimethylamine | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.02 | ||
| Guanidinoacetic acid | -0.14 | 0.03 | -0.12 | 0.04 | ||
| Glycolic acid | -0.16 | 0.03 | -0.20 | 0.02 | ||
| BMI | Formic acid | -0.04 | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.20 | |
| Alanine | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.01 | ||
| Betaine | -0.10 | 0.01 | -0.13 | 0.03 | ||
| Choline | -0.11 | 0.01 | -0.17 | 0.01 | ||
| Creatine | -0.10 | 0.01 | -0.10 | 0.10 | ||
| Dimethylamine | 0.18 | 5.51 | 0.26 | 0.01 | ||
| Ethanolamine | 0.13 | 2.10 | 0.15 | 0.02 | ||
| Glutamine | -0.12 | 3.32 | -0.16 | 0.01 | ||
| Glycolic acid | -0.15 | 6.74 | -0.19 | 0.01 | ||
| Guanidinoacetic acid | -0.14 | 1.30 | -0.17 | 0.01 | ||
| Lactic acid | -0.08 | 0.02 | -0.16 | 0.01 | ||
| Methanol | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.36 | ||
| Taurine | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.10 | 0.10 | ||
| WC | Formic acid | -0.02 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.21 | |
| Alanine | 0.05 | 1.93 | 0.07 | 0.05 | ||
| Betaine | -0.05 | 1.67 | -0.05 | 0.12 | ||
| Choline | -0.05 | 1.67 | -0.08 | 3.99 | ||
| Creatine | -0.04 | 0.01 | -0.03 | 0.13 | ||
| Dimethylamine | 0.07 | 7.71 | 0.09 | 3.99 | ||
| Ethanolamine | 0.06 | 6.87 | 0.06 | 0.01 | ||
| Glutamine | -0.06 | 8.49 | -0.06 | 0.01 | ||
| Glycolic acid | -0.05 | 1.67 | -0.06 | 0.01 | ||
| Guanidinoacetic acid | -0.06 | 6.87 | -0.07 | 0.01 | ||
| Lactic acid | -0.03 | 0.02 | -0.06 | 0.01 | ||
| Methanol | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.30 | ||
| Phenylalanine | -0.04 | 0.03 | -0.02 | 0.28 | ||
| Serine | -0.04 | 0.02 | -0.05 | 0.02 | ||
| Taurine | -0.03 | 0.02 | -0.04 | 0.10 | ||
Model 1: regression model adjusted for study, age (non-linear) and sex. Model 2: regression model adjusted for study, age and sex interaction (non-linear), smoking status, menopausal status (women only), physical activity, urinary glucose, and eGFR. VAT = visceral adipose tissue, BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, ß = beta coefficient, p-value = corrected for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate.
*linear model applied, p-values<0.05 after correction for multiple testing were considered significant.
Significant results from multiple regression analyses on the relation of VAT to urinary bins (all subjects).
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropometric variable | bin (ppm) | ß | p | ß | p | metabolite identification |
| VAT | 3.795 | 0.0341 | 0.0106 | 0.0388 | 0.0155 | Lysine |
| 1.485 | 0.0981 | 0.0500 | 0.0918 | 0.0285 | ||
| 2.435 | -0.0354 | 0.0316 | -0.0329 | 0.0318 | 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaric acid, others | |
| 2.475 | -0.0334 | 0.0695 | -0.0355 | 0.0102 | ||
| 3.945 | -0.0452 | 0.0695 | -0.0475 | 0.0320 | 4-Hydroxyhippuric acid | |
| 6.955 | -0.0717 | 0.0277 | -0.0860 | 0.0100 | ||
| 6.965 | -0.0803 | 0.0277 | -0.0843 | 0.0227 | ||
| 2.235 | -0.0480 | 0.0562 | -0.0526 | 0.0318 | Acetone | |
| 2.725 | 0.0518 | 0.0546 | 0.0601 | 0.0304 | Dimethylamine | |
| 3.205 | -0.0324 | 0.0546 | -0.0458 | 0.0097 | Choline, others | |
| 3.525 | -0.0455 | 0.0562 | -0.0463 | 0.0344 | ||
| 4.065 | -0.1101 | 0.0546 | -0.1337 | 0.0175 | ||
| 2.675 | -0.1161 | 0.0546 | -0.1358 | 0.0304 | Citric acid | |
| 2.735 | 0.0633 | 0.0772 | 0.0813 | 0.0304 | Dimethylamine | |
| 3.565 | -0.0661 | 0.0546 | -0.0669 | 0.0349 | Glycine, others | |
| 2.405 | -0.0540 | 0.0277 | -0.0583 | 0.0100 | L-Pyroglutamic acid | |
| 2.515 | -0.0430 | 0.0313 | -0.0430 | 0.0297 | ||
| 2.395 | -0.0283 | 0.1068 | -0.0308 | 0.0465 | ||
| 2.425 | -0.0318 | 0.0695 | -0.0348 | 0.0320 | ||
| 1.235 | -0.0428 | 0.0546 | -0.0457 | 0.0318 | Methylmalonic acid | |
| 3.355 | -0.0503 | 0.0277 | -0.0561 | 0.0223 | scyllo-Inositol | |
| 3.055 | 0.0952 | 0.0587 | 0.1149 | 0.0304 | Creatinine | |
| 2.965 | -0.0347 | 0.0772 | -0.0394 | 0.0435 | Asparagine, unknown | |
| 2.975 | -0.0331 | 0.0772 | -0.0674 | 0.0381 | ||
| 8.455 | -0.0911 | 0.0316 | -0.1013 | 0.0223 | Formic acid | |
| 3.535 | -0.0324 | 0.0695 | -0.0320 | 0.0465 | Sugar compounds, unknown | |
| 1.355 | 0.0234 | 0.0271 | 0.0226 | 0.0392 | unknown | |
| VAT | 2.325 | -0.0303 | 0.0661 | -0.0307 | 0.0320 | unknown |
| 2.335 | -0.0259 | 0.1025 | -0.0276 | 0.0320 | unknown | |
| 2.365 | -0.0362 | 0.0562 | -0.0377 | 0.0320 | unknown | |
| 2.605 | -0.0119 | 0.0346 | -0.0508 | 0.0217 | unknown | |
| 2.615 | -0.0157 | 0.0446 | -0.0613 | 0.0162 | unknown | |
| 2.625 | -0.0198 | 0.0018 | -0.0511 | 0.0045 | unknown | |
| 2.645 | -0.0468 | 0.0546 | -0.0454 | 0.0449 | unknown | |
| 6.585 | -0.0657 | 0.0277 | -0.0692 | 0.0223 | unknown | |
| 6.785 | -0.0369 | 0.0772 | -0.0439 | 0.0320 | unknown | |
| 6.805 | -0.0632 | 0.0433 | -0.0807 | 0.0223 | unknown | |
| 6.945 | -0.0384 | 0.1147 | -0.0489 | 0.0320 | unknown | |
Model 1: linear regression model adjusted for study, age (non-linear) and sex. Model 2: regression model adjusted for study, age and sex interaction (non-linear), smoking status, menopausal status (women only), physical activity, urinary glucose, and eGFR. VAT = visceral adipose tissue, ß = beta coefficient, p-value = corrected for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate. p-values<0.05 after correction for multiple testing were considered significant.
Significant results from gender specific multiple regression analyses on the relation between VAT and serum bins.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropometric variable | bin (ppm) | ß | p | ß | p | metabolite identification |
| VAT | 0.995 | 0.0413 | 0.0146 | 0.0588 | 0.0015 | Valine |
| 0.985 | 0.0381 | 0.0476 | 0.0138 | 0.0285 | ||
| 1.035 | 0.0813 | 0.0246 | 0.0562 | 0.0128 | ||
| 0.935 | 0.0008 | 0.9952 | 0.0466 | 0.0178 | Isoleucine, ketoleucine | |
| 2.605 | -0.0160 | 0.9746 | -0.0508 | 0.0117 | Ketoleucine | |
| 2.615 | -0.0175 | 0.9746 | -0.0613 | 0.0060 | ||
| 2.625 | -0.0084 | 0.9818 | -0.0502 | 0.0047 | ||
| 1.065 | 0.0444 | 0.8602 | 0.0993 | 0.0006 | Isobutyric acid, unknown | |
| 1.075 | 0.0314 | 0.8602 | 0.0798 | 0.0017 | ||
| 2.655 | 0.0186 | 0.8602 | 0.0442 | 0.0093 | Methionine, unknown | |
| 7.375 | 0.0170 | 0.9746 | 0.0669 | 0.0202 | Phenylalanine, unknown | |
| 7.555 | 0.0485 | 0.9802 | 0.1351 | 0.0274 | Tryptophan | |
| 2.595 | 0.0203 | 0.9746 | 0.0538 | 0.0285 | unknown | |
| 2.635 | 0.0167 | 0.9746 | 0.0672 | 0.0003 | unknown | |
| 4.345 | -0.2167 | 0.7141 | -0.4572 | 0.0013 | unknown | |
| 6.745 | 0.4734 | 0.8602 | 0.7706 | 0.0351 | unknown | |
| 7.485 | -0.2613 | 0.8602 | -0.4372 | 0.0388 | unknown | |
| 1.085 | 0.0271 | 0.8602 | 0.0638 | 0.0202 | unknown | |
| 1.105 | 0.0102 | 0.9818 | 0.0826 | 0.0161 | unknown | |
| 7.675 | -0.2390 | 0.7141 | -0.3350 | 0.0082 | unknown | |
| VAT | 0.735 | -0.0242 | 0.5579 | -0.0482 | 0.0136 | Lipid-cholesterol |
| 0.605 | -0.4264 | 0.1599 | -0.3640 | 0.0136 | unknown | |
| 7.845 | -0.2337 | 0.1888 | -0.4020 | 0.0368 | unknown | |
Model 1: linear regression model adjusted for study, age (non-linear) and sex. Model 2: linear regression model adjusted for study, age and sex interaction (non-linear), smoking status, menopausal status (women only), physical activity, urinary glucose, and eGFR. In each case, the stratification variable was excluded from the model. VAT = visceral adipose tissue, ß = beta coefficient, p-value = corrected for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate. p-values<0.05 after correction for multiple testing were considered significant.