| Literature DB >> 24391874 |
Michael S Lustgarten1, Lori Lyn Price2, Edward M Phillips1, Roger A Fielding1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic profiling may provide insight into biologic mechanisms related to age-related increases in regional adiposity and insulin resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24391874 PMCID: PMC3877144 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Subject demographics.
| Age (y) | 77.7±3.9 |
| % Female | 59 |
| Body weight (kg) | 74.0±10.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.0±3.2 |
| Total Fat Mass (kg) | 25.6±7.2 |
| Trunk Fat/Peripheral Fat | 1.1±0.3 |
| IMAT (cm2) | 4.7 |
| SCAT (cm2) | 82.5±42.4 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.7±2.0 |
Values shown represent means±SD. IMAT, intermuscular adipose tissue; SCAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-IR.
Metabolites significantly associated with IMAT.
| β±SE | p-value | q-value | |
|
| |||
| 2-hydroxyisobutyrate | 2.5±0.6 | 1E-04 | 0.007 |
| Glycine | −2.9±0.9 | 0.001 | 0.03 |
| Glutamine | −5.1±1.7 | 0.003 | 0.04 |
| N-acetylthreonine | 2.5±0.8 | 0.003 | 0.04 |
| Urea | 1.6±0.6 | 0.007 | 0.07 |
| S-methylcysteine | −1.7±0.6 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| 4-acetamidobutanoate | 2.2±0.9 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Serine | −2.9±1.2 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Methionine | −4.5±1.9 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Indolelactate | 1.5±0.7 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| N-acetylalanine | 3.1±1.4 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Indoleacetate | 1.5±0.7 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Symmetric dimethylarginine | 2.5±1.2 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| γ-glutamylthreonine | 1.4±0.7 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| N-methyl proline | 0.5±0.2 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate | 1.2±0.6 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| Asparagine | −2.5±1.2 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| Creatine | 1.1±0.6 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
|
| |||
| 17-methylstearate | 2.1±0.8 | 0.009 | 0.07 |
| Dihomo-linolenate (20∶3n3 or n6) | 2.4±0.9 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Palmitate (16∶0) | 2.9±1.1 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Pentadecanoate (15∶0) | 2.0±0.8 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Docosadienoate (22∶2n6) | 2.0±0.8 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Margarate (17∶0) | 1.8±0.8 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| 10-heptadecenoate (17∶1n7) | 1.7±0.8 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Myristate (14∶0) | 2.1±0.9 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Docosapentaenoate (n6 DPA; 22∶5n6) | 1.4±0.6 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| Stearidonate (18∶4n3) | 1.3±0.6 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| Caproate (6∶0) | 2.0±1.0 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
|
| |||
| Butyrylcarnitine | 1.9±0.5 | 0.0006 | 0.02 |
| 3-dehydrocarnitine | 2.4±0.8 | 0.003 | 0.04 |
| Methylglutaroylcarnitine | 0.6±0.3 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
All models were adjusted for sex, age and total fat. Metabolites are listed with their respective parameter estimates and standard errors (β±SE) in order of significance (p-value) and, with q-values.
Metabolites significantly associated with abdominal adiposity.
| β±SE | p-value | q-value | |
|
| |||
| Glycine | −0.3±0.1 | 0.002 | 0.15 |
| 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate | 0.2±0.1 | 0.007 | 0.19 |
| Glutamine | −0.5±0.2 | 0.008 | 0.19 |
| 3-hydroxyisobutyrate | 0.3±0.1 | 0.007 | 0.19 |
| 3-methoxytyrosine | −0.3±0.1 | 0.01 | 0.24 |
|
| |||
| Isovalerylcarnitine | 0.2±0.1 | 0.001 | 0.15 |
| 3-dehydrocarnitine | 0.3±0.1 | 0.006 | 0.19 |
All models were adjusted for sex, age and total fat. Metabolites are listed with their respective parameter estimates and standard errors (β±SE) in order of significance (p-value) and, with q-values.
Metabolites associated with HOMA-IR, IMAT, abdominal adiposity, and, SCAT.
| HOMA-IR | IMAT | AbdominalAdiposity | SCAT | |
| Glycine | −2.4±0.8 | −2.9±0.9 | −0.3±0.1 | 35.0±9.8 |
| 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate | 1.8±0.5 | 1.2±0.6 | 0.2±0.1 | −16.4±6.7 |
| Glutamine | −4.8±1.5 | −5.1±1.7 | −0.5±0.2 | 23.7±19.9 |
| 2-hydroxyisobutyrate | 1.3±0.6 | 2.5±0.6 | 0.0±0.1 | −1.4±7.6 |
| Butyrylcarnitine | 1.5±0.5 | 1.9±0.5 | 0.1±0.1 | −15.2±6.4 |
All models were adjusted for sex, age and total fat. Metabolites are listed with their respective parameter estimates and standard errors (β±SE).
p≤0.05, q ≤0.030;
p<0.05, q≥0.30.
Stepwise linear regression on metabolites containing significant associations with regional adipose tissue and HOMA-IR.
| β±SE | p-value | Bootstrap β (95% CI) | |
|
| |||
| Intercept | −17.3±4.9 | 0.0008 | −16.7 (−26.3, −6.8) |
| Sex | 1.2±0.5 | 0.03 | 1.6 (0.6, 2.8) |
| Age | 0.2±0.1 | 0.002 | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) |
| Total fat | 0.2±0.0 | 2E-08 | 0.3 (0.2, 0.4) |
| 2-hydroxyisobutyrate | 2.0±0.9 | 0.002 | 2.0 (0.9, 3.0) |
| Glycine | −2.0±0.6 | 0.03 | −1.9 (−3.5, −0.4) |
|
| |||
| Intercept | 1.0±0.6 | 0.11 | 1.0 (−0.0, 2.2) |
| Sex | 0.4±0.1 | 4E-07 | 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) |
| Age | −0.0±0.0 | 0.67 | −0.0 (−0.0, 0.0) |
| Total fat | 0.0±0.0 | 0.08 | 0.0 (−0.0, 0.0) |
| Glycine | −0.3±0.1 | 0.002 | −0.3 (−0.5, −0.2) |
All models were adjusted for sex, age and total fat. Covariates are listed with parameter estimates and standard errors (β±SE), and with p-values. Bootstrap parameter estimates (β) are shown with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).