Literature DB >> 23153743

Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a prospective study of the long-term outcome of 500 inguinal basins assessed at a single institution.

Wayne Lam1, Hussain M Alnajjar, Susannah La-Touche, Matthew Perry, Davendra Sharma, Cathy Corbishley, James Pilcher, Sue Heenan, Nick Watkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) in combination with ultrasound scan (USS) has been the technique of choice at our centre since 2004 for the assessment of nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes (cN0) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCp). Sensitivity and false-negative rates may vary depending on whether results are reported per patient or per node basin, and with or without USS.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of patients undergoing DSNB and USS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in our cohort of newly diagnosed cN0 SCCp patients, as well as to analyse any variation in sensitivity of the procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A series of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed SCCp, over a 6-yr period (2004-2010), were analysed prospectively with a minimum follow-up period of 21 mo. All patients had definitive histology of ≥ T1G2 and nonpalpable nodes in one or both inguinal basins. Patients with persistent or untreated local disease were excluded from the study. INTERVENTION: All eligible patients had DSNB and USS with or without FNAC of cN0 groins. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was no nodal disease recurrence on follow-up. The secondary end point was complications after DSNB. Sensitivity of the procedure was calculated per node basin, per patient, with DSNB alone, and with USS with DSNB combined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Five hundred inguinal basins in 264 patients underwent USS with or without FNAC and DSNB. Seventy-three positive inguinal basins (14.6%) in 59 patients (22.3%) were identified. Four inguinal basins in four patients were confirmed false negative at 5, 8, 12, and 18 mo. Two inguinal basins had positive USS and FNAC and negative DSNB results. Sensitivity of DSNB with USS, with and without FNAC, per inguinal basin was 95% and per patient was 94%. Sensitivity of DSNB alone per inguinal basin and per patient was 92% and 91%, respectively. The DSNB morbidity rate was 7.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: DSNB in combination with USS has excellent performance characteristics to stage patients with cN0 SCCp, with a 5% false-negative rate per node basin and a 6% false-negative rate per patient.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23153743     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  23 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Penile cancer: Developments in sentinel lymph node biopsy for penile cancer.

Authors:  Nick Watkin; Susannah La-Touche
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Early experience of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: review of surgical outcomes relative to alternative approaches.

Authors:  Talar B Kharadjian; Surena F Matin; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in renal malignancy: The past, present and future.

Authors:  Tharani Mahesan; Alberto Coscione; Ben Ayres; Nick Watkin
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

Review 5.  Radiocolloid-based dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer with clinically negative inguinal lymph node: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zi-Jun Zou; Zhi-Hong Liu; Liang-You Tang; Yu-Jie Wang; Jia-Yu Liang; Ruo-Cheng Zhang; Yong-Quan Tang; Yi-Ping Lu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: an initial experience in an Irish Hospital.

Authors:  P E Lonergan; A Nic An Riogh; F O'Kelly; D J Lundon; D O'Sullivan; M O'Connell; P K Hegarty
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Jeanne-Julien; Olivier Bouchot; Stéphane De Vergie; Julien Branchereau; Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe; Jérôme Rigaud
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  [Long-term results of sentinel node biopsy diagnostics in penile carcinoma : Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in cases with nonpalpable lymph nodes in the groin].

Authors:  C M Naumann; K Bothe; A-K Munk-Hartig; C van der Horst; H Massad; U Lützen; K-P Jünemann; M F Hamann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Penile cancer: a local case series and literature review.

Authors:  Wei Da Lau; Chin Hu Ong; Tow Poh Lim; Colin Teo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.