George Coba1, Trushar Patel2. 1. University of South Florida-Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 2. Department of Urology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 2 Tampa General Circle, STC6, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA. tpatel7@usf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most current literature on how the treatment for penile cancer can affect quality of life and to discuss current treatment options to overcome sexual dysfunction and ultimately improve patient wellbeing. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist to address the high incidence of sexual dysfunction following penile cancer treatment. Advancements and refinements in the neophalloplasty, penile prosthesis, and penile lengthening procedures have opened the door to improved long-term outcomes. Additionally, studies continue to highlight the severe psychological toll that penile cancer treatment can have on patients. We explore the potential options for addressing the inherent psychologic effects of these treatments and highlight the need for further research in this domain. Although rare, it is important for all urologists to be familiar with the treatments and post-treatment sequelae of penile cancer. Penile cancer is associated with dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist that addresses these concerns. Additionally, urologists must also be mindful of the psychologic component regarding surgical disfigurement and the decline in sexual function.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most current literature on how the treatment for penile cancer can affect quality of life and to discuss current treatment options to overcome sexual dysfunction and ultimately improve patient wellbeing. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist to address the high incidence of sexual dysfunction following penile cancer treatment. Advancements and refinements in the neophalloplasty, penile prosthesis, and penile lengthening procedures have opened the door to improved long-term outcomes. Additionally, studies continue to highlight the severe psychological toll that penile cancer treatment can have on patients. We explore the potential options for addressing the inherent psychologic effects of these treatments and highlight the need for further research in this domain. Although rare, it is important for all urologists to be familiar with the treatments and post-treatment sequelae of penile cancer. Penile cancer is associated with dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist that addresses these concerns. Additionally, urologists must also be mindful of the psychologic component regarding surgical disfigurement and the decline in sexual function.
Entities:
Keywords:
Penile cancer; Quality of life; Sexual dysfunction; Sexual outcomes
Authors: Michele Marchioni; Francesco Berardinelli; Cosimo De Nunzio; Philippe Spiess; Francesco Porpiglia; Luigi Schips; Luca Cindolo Journal: Minerva Urol Nefrol Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: Leandro Koifman; Antonio J Vides; Nelson Koifman; João P Carvalho; Antonio A Ornellas Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Mariela R Pow-Sang; Ubirajara Ferreira; Julio M Pow-Sang; Aguinaldo C Nardi; Victor Destefano Journal: Urology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Laia Alemany; Antonio Cubilla; Gordana Halec; Elena Kasamatsu; Beatriz Quirós; Emili Masferrer; Sara Tous; Belén Lloveras; Gustavo Hernández-Suarez; Ray Lonsdale; Leopoldo Tinoco; Maria Alejo; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Jan Laco; Nuria Guimerà; Enrique Poblet; Luis E Lombardi; Christine Bergeron; Omar Clavero; Hai-Rim Shin; Annabelle Ferrera; Ana Felix; Julieta Germar; Vaclav Mandys; Christine Clavel; Maria Tzardi; Luis E Pons; Vincent Wain; Eugenia Cruz; Carla Molina; Jose D Mota; Robert Jach; Julio Velasco; Carla Carrilho; Ruben López-Revilla; Marc T Goodman; Wim G Quint; Xavier Castellsagué; Ignacio Bravo; Michael Pawlita; Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 20.096