Literature DB >> 28400327

A multisensory perspective on object memory.

Pawel J Matusz1, Mark T Wallace2, Micah M Murray3.   

Abstract

Traditional studies of memory and object recognition involved objects presented within a single sensory modality (i.e., purely visual or purely auditory objects). However, in naturalistic settings, objects are often evaluated and processed in a multisensory manner. This begets the question of how object representations that combine information from the different senses are created and utilised by memory functions. Here we review research that has demonstrated that a single multisensory exposure can influence memory for both visual and auditory objects. In an old/new object discrimination task, objects that were presented initially with a task-irrelevant stimulus in another sense were better remembered compared to stimuli presented alone, most notably when the two stimuli were semantically congruent. The brain discriminates between these two types of object representations within the first 100ms post-stimulus onset, indicating early "tagging" of objects/events by the brain based on the nature of their initial presentation context. Interestingly, the specific brain networks supporting the improved object recognition vary based on a variety of factors, including the effectiveness of the initial multisensory presentation and the sense that is task-relevant. We specify the requisite conditions for multisensory contexts to improve object discrimination following single exposures, and the individual differences that exist with respect to these improvements. Our results shed light onto how memory operates on the multisensory nature of object representations as well as how the brain stores and retrieves memories of objects.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Cross-modal; Learning; Memory; Multisensory; Object; Visual

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28400327      PMCID: PMC5632572          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  66 in total

1.  What you see is not (always) what you hear: induced gamma band responses reflect cross-modal interactions in familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of auditory cortices in the retrieval of single-trial auditory-visual object memories.

Authors:  Pawel J Matusz; Antonia Thelen; Sarah Amrein; Eveline Geiser; Jacques Anken; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  The contributions of sensory dominance and attentional bias to cross-modal enhancement of visual cortex excitability.

Authors:  Vincenzo Romei; Micah M Murray; Céline Cappe; Gregor Thut
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Distinct Neural Suppression and Encoding Effects for Conceptual Novelty and Familiarity.

Authors:  Niv Reggev; Oded Bein; Anat Maril
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.

Authors:  Michael J Crosse; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Audiovisual semantic congruency during encoding enhances memory performance.

Authors:  Jenni Heikkilä; Kimmo Alho; Heidi Hyvönen; Kaisa Tiippana
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2015

8.  Neural substrates of crossmodal association memory in monkeys: the amygdala versus the anterior rhinal cortex.

Authors:  S Goulet; E A Murray
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Delineating the effect of semantic congruency on episodic memory: the role of integration and relatedness.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Neta Livneh; Niv Reggev; Michael Gilead; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein; Anat Maril
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code.

Authors:  Alexandra O Constantinescu; Jill X O'Reilly; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Are We Ready for Real-world Neuroscience?

Authors:  Pawel J Matusz; Suzanne Dikker; Alexander G Huth; Catherine Perrodin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Semantically congruent audiovisual integration with modal-based attention accelerates auditory short-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  Hongtao Yu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang; JiaJia Yang; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Multisensory Facilitation of Working Memory Training.

Authors:  Anja Pahor; Cindy Collins; Rachel N Smith; Austin Moon; Trevor Stavropoulos; Ilse Silva; Elaine Peng; Susanne M Jaeggi; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2020-11-27

4.  Long-term memory representations for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Oliver Jaggy; Frank Papenmeier; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-09-13

Review 5.  Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-27

6.  Multisensory Gains in Simple Detection Predict Global Cognition in Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Solange Denervaud; Edouard Gentaz; Pawel J Matusz; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Object Handling for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review and the Development of Intervention Guidance.

Authors:  Federica D'Andrea; Tom Dening; Victoria Tischler
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2022-06-13

8.  Visual Sensory Cortices Causally Contribute to Auditory Word Recognition Following Sensorimotor-Enriched Vocabulary Training.

Authors:  Brian Mathias; Leona Sureth; Gesa Hartwigsen; Manuela Macedonia; Katja M Mayer; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Sensory dominance and multisensory integration as screening tools in aging.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Alison F Eardley; Trudi Edginton; Rebecca Oyekan; Emily Smyth; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.