Literature DB >> 19066869

The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg1, Leon Y Deouell.   

Abstract

Little is known on cross-modal interaction in complex object recognition. The factors influencing this interaction were investigated using simultaneous presentation of pictures and vocalizations of animals. In separate blocks, the task was to identify either the visual or the auditory stimulus, ignoring the other modality. The pictures and the sounds were congruent (same animal), incongruent (different animals) or neutral (animal with meaningless stimulus). Performance in congruent trials was better than in incongruent trials, regardless of whether subjects attended the visual or the auditory stimuli, but the effect was larger in the latter case. This asymmetry persisted with addition of a long delay after the stimulus and before the response. Thus, the asymmetry cannot be explained by a lack of processing time for the auditory stimulus. However, the asymmetry was eliminated when low-contrast visual stimuli were used. These findings suggest that when visual stimulation is highly informative, it affects auditory recognition more than auditory stimulation affects visual recognition. Nevertheless, this modality dominance is not rigid; it is highly influenced by the quality of the presented information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19066869     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1664-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Cross-modal sensory processing in the anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Mark T Wallace; Joseph A Maldjian; Christina M Susi; Barry E Stein; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.

Authors:  Donald J Tellinghuisen; Erin J Nowak
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

3.  Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia.

Authors:  W David Hairston; Paul J Laurienti; Gautam Mishra; Jonathan H Burdette; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Lack of cortical contrast gain control in human photosensitive epilepsy.

Authors:  V Porciatti; P Bonanni; A Fiorentini; R Guerrini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Why seeing is believing: merging auditory and visual worlds.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  What you see is not (always) what you hear: induced gamma band responses reflect cross-modal interactions in familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Reaction times in a bisensory task: implications for attention and speech perception.

Authors:  B T Mynatt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Distinct contrast response functions in striate and extra-striate regions of visual cortex revealed with magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Stephen D Hall; Ian E Holliday; Arjan Hillebrand; Paul L Furlong; Krish D Singh; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  27 in total

1.  Perceptual decisions formed by accumulation of audiovisual evidence in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Uta Noppeney; Dirk Ostwald; Sebastian Werner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Mark Rijpkema; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.

Authors:  Beatriz R Sarmiento; Pawel J Matusz; Daniel Sanabria; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  A multisensory perspective on object memory.

Authors:  Pawel J Matusz; Mark T Wallace; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Semantic incongruity influences response caution in audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinweg; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Selective Enhancement of Object Representations through Multisensory Integration.

Authors:  David A Tovar; Micah M Murray; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The evocative power of words: activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-09-19

9.  Cross-modal conflicts in object recognition: determining the influence of object category.

Authors:  Jessica N Vogler; Kirsteen Titchener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dogs recognize dog and human emotions.

Authors:  Natalia Albuquerque; Kun Guo; Anna Wilkinson; Carine Savalli; Emma Otta; Daniel Mills
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.