Literature DB >> 36100821

Long-term memory representations for audio-visual scenes.

Hauke S Meyerhoff1,2, Oliver Jaggy3, Frank Papenmeier4, Markus Huff3,4.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the nature of long-term memory representations for naturalistic audio-visual scenes. Whereas previous research has shown that audio-visual scenes are recognized more accurately than their unimodal counterparts, it remains unclear whether this benefit stems from audio-visually integrated long-term memory representations or a summation of independent retrieval cues. We tested two predictions for audio-visually integrated memory representations. First, we used a modeling approach to test whether recognition performance for audio-visual scenes is more accurate than would be expected from independent retrieval cues. This analysis shows that audio-visual integration is not necessary to explain the benefit of audio-visual scenes relative to purely auditory or purely visual scenes. Second, we report a series of experiments investigating the occurrence of study-test congruency effects for unimodal and audio-visual scenes. Most importantly, visually encoded information was immune to additional auditory information presented during testing, whereas auditory encoded information was susceptible to additional visual information presented during testing. This renders a true integration of visual and auditory information in long-term memory representations unlikely. In sum, our results instead provide evidence for visual dominance in long-term memory. Whereas associative auditory information is capable of enhancing memory performance, the long-term memory representations appear to be primarily visual.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audio-visual advantage; Audio-visual integration; Long-term memory; Naturalistic scenes; Study-test congruency

Year:  2022        PMID: 36100821     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01355-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  66 in total

1.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence.

Authors:  S Dehaene; E Spelke; P Pinel; R Stanescu; S Tsivkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The crossmodal facilitation of visual object representations by sound: evidence from the backward masking paradigm.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  When are moving images remembered better? Study-test congruence and the dynamic superiority effect.

Authors:  Luciano G Buratto; William J Matthews; Koen Lamberts
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; Jonathan Gill; Aude Oliva; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-29

7.  Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations.

Authors:  I Biederman; R J Mezzanotte; J C Rabinowitz
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Audiovisual semantic interactions between linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli: The time-courses and categorical specificity.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition.

Authors:  A Amedi; K von Kriegstein; N M van Atteveldt; M S Beauchamp; M J Naumer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Varieties of numerical abilities.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.