Literature DB >> 35641858

Semantically congruent audiovisual integration with modal-based attention accelerates auditory short-term memory retrieval.

Hongtao Yu1, Aijun Wang2, Ming Zhang1,3, JiaJia Yang1, Satoshi Takahashi1, Yoshimichi Ejima1, Jinglong Wu1,4.   

Abstract

Evidence has shown that multisensory integration benefits to unisensory perception performance are asymmetric and that auditory perception performance can receive more multisensory benefits, especially when the attention focus is directed toward a task-irrelevant visual stimulus. At present, whether the benefits of semantically (in)congruent multisensory integration with modal-based attention for subsequent unisensory short-term memory (STM) retrieval are also asymmetric remains unclear. Using a delayed matching-to-sample paradigm, the present study investigated this issue by manipulating the attention focus during multisensory memory encoding. The results revealed that both visual and auditory STM retrieval reaction times were faster under semantically congruent multisensory conditions than under unisensory memory encoding conditions. We suggest that coherent multisensory representation formation might be optimized by restricted multisensory encoding and can be rapidly triggered by subsequent unisensory memory retrieval demands. Crucially, auditory STM retrieval is exclusively accelerated by semantically congruent multisensory memory encoding, indicating that the less effective sensory modality of memory retrieval relies more on the coherent prior formation of a multisensory representation optimized by modal-based attention.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiovisual integration; Modal-based attention; Semantic congruency; Short-term memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35641858     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02437-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  40 in total

1.  Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention.

Authors:  P E Downing
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

2.  Aging and interference in verbal working memory.

Authors:  T Hedden; D Park
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-12

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 4.  The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Semantics and the multisensory brain: how meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Oliver Doehrmann; Marcus J Naumer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA.

Authors:  Thom Baguley
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

7.  ERP evidence that auditory-visual speech facilitates working memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Jana B Frtusova; Axel H Winneke; Natalie A Phillips
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-02-18

8.  Audiovisual integration facilitates monkeys' short-term memory.

Authors:  James Bigelow; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification.

Authors:  Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Jacques Pernier; Marie Hélène Giard
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

10.  Interference Impacts Working Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Sara Aurtenetxe; Javier García-Pacios; David Del Río; María E López; José A Pineda-Pardo; Alberto Marcos; Maria L Delgado Losada; José M López-Frutos; Fernando Maestú
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.