Literature DB >> 32112734

Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.

Gayathree Murugappan1, Shufeng Li2, Ruth B Lathi3, Valerie L Baker4, Barbara Luke5, Michael L Eisenberg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe maternal morbidity continues to be an issue of national and global concern and is increasing in incidence. The incidence of infertility is also on the rise, and infertile women experience a higher risk of incident chronic medical disease and cancer, suggesting that fertility may serve as a window to a woman's overall health.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis using Optum's de-identifed Clinformatics Data Mart Database between 2003 and 2015. Infertile women stratified by infertility diagnosis, testing, or treatment were compared to fertile women seeking routine gynecologic care. In both groups, only women who underwent pregnancy and delivery of a singleton during the follow-up period were included. Main outcomes were severe maternal morbidity indicators, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and identified by International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision and Common Procedural Technology codes within 6 weeks of each delivery. Results were adjusted for maternal age, race, education, nulliparity, smoking, obesity, delivery mode, preterm birth, number of prenatal visits, and year of delivery.
RESULTS: A total of 19,658 women comprised the infertile group and 525,695 women comprised the fertile group. The overall incidence of any severe maternal morbidity indicator was 7.0% among women receiving fertility treatment, 6.4% among women receiving a fertility diagnosis, 5.5% among women receiving fertility testing, and 4.3% among fertile women. Overall, infertile women had a significantly higher risk of developing any severe maternal morbidity indicator (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; confidence interval, 1.14-1.31, P < .01) as well as a significantly higher risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; confidence interval, 1.26-1.73, P < .01), eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; confidence interval, 1.05-1.79, P < .01), heart failure during procedure or surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.54; confidence interval, 1.21-1.97, P < .01), internal injuries of the thorax, abdomen, or pelvis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59; confidence interval, 1.12-2.26, P < .01), intracranial injuries (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; confidence interval, 1.20-2.61, P < .01), pulmonary edema (adjusted odds ratio, 2.18; confidence interval, 1.54-3.10, P < .01), thrombotic embolism (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; confidence interval, 1.14-2.17, P < .01), and blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; confidence interval, 1.30-1.72, P < .01) compared to fertile women. Fertile women did not face a significantly higher risk of any maternal morbidity indicator compared to infertile women. In subgroup analysis by maternal race/ethnicity, the likelihood of severe morbidity was significantly higher among fertile black women compared to fertile white women. There was no difference between infertile black women and infertile white women after multivariable adjustment.
CONCLUSION: Using an insurance claims database, we report that women diagnosed with infertility and women receiving fertility treatment experience a significantly higher risk of multiple indicators of severe maternal morbidity compared to fertile women. The increased risk of severe maternal morbidity noted among fertile black women compared to fertile white women is attenuated among infertile black women, who face risks similar to those of infertile white women.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  female infertility; fertility treatment; maternal mortality; racial disparities; severe maternal morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32112734      PMCID: PMC8016184          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  27 in total

1.  Maternal morbidity during childbirth hospitalization in California.

Authors:  Audrey Lyndon; Henry C Lee; William M Gilbert; Jeffrey B Gould; Kathryn A Lee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-08-07

2.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility: stratified reproduction in a population-based sample of U.S. women.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan; Karina M Shreffler; Katherine M Johnson; Kathleen S Slauson-Blevins
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2011-10-26

4.  Validation of Severe Maternal Morbidity on the US Certificate of Live Birth.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Chia-Ling Liu; Hafsatou Diop; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Assessing the Quality of Medical and Health Data From the 2003 Birth Certificate Revision: Results From New York City.

Authors:  Elizabeth C W Gregory; Joyce A Martin; Erica Lee Argov; Michelle J K Osterman
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2019-06

Review 6.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shilpi Pandey; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995.

Authors:  E H Stephen; A Chandra
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2000 May-Jun

8.  Utilization of infertility services: how much does money matter?

Authors:  J Farley Ordovensky Staniec; Natalie J Webb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Infertility service use among U.S. women: 1995 and 2002.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Elizabeth Hervey Stephen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Validation of infertility treatment and assisted reproductive technology use on the birth certificate in eight states.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Logan G Spector
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of infertility with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Gayathree Murugappan; Stephanie A Leonard; Leslie V Farland; Emily S Lau; Aladdin H Shadyab; Robert A Wild; Peter Schnatz; Suzan L Carmichael; Marcia L Stefanick; Nisha I Parikh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 7.490

2.  Healthcare Use in the Five Years Before a First Infertility Diagnosis: A Danish Register-Based Case-Control Study in the CROSS-TRACKS Cohort.

Authors:  Ninna Hinchely Ebdrup; Anders Hammerich Riis; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen; Bjørn Bay; Julie Lyngsø; Dorte Rytter; Marianne Johansson Jørgensen; Ulla Breth Knudsen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.814

3.  Association between infertility and all-cause mortality: analysis of US claims data.

Authors:  Gayathree Murugappan; Shufeng Li; Ruben J Alvero; Barbara Luke; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 10.693

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.