Judy E Stern1, Chia-Ling Liu2, Sunah S Hwang3, Dmitry Dukhovny4, Hafsatou Diop2, Howard Cabral5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address: judy.e.stern@dartmoth.edu. 2. Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the maternal demographic, health, and fertility variables underlying prematurity. DESIGN: Retrospective: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data linked to Massachusetts birth certificates and hospital stays. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: We included 166,963 privately insured, singleton, first births to women ≥18 years of age between 2004 and 2013. Deliveries were as follows: assisted reproductive technology (ART) when linked to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, medically assisted reproduction (MAR) when fertility treatment was indicated on the birth certificate, unassisted subfertile (USF) when there were indications of subfertility but no treatment, and fertile if none of the above. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Late preterm birth (LPTB; 34-36 weeks) and early preterm birth (EPTB; <34 weeks) were compared with term deliveries (≥37 weeks). Covariates that statistically significantly influenced prematurity in binary analysis were modeled by using multinomial logistic regression. Backward elimination and mediation analysis were used to determine the influence of single parameters on outcomes of others. RESULTS: LPTB was increased in the USF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.65) and ART (AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.56) but not MAR (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.37). ETPB was increased in all (USF: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-2.31; MAR: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12; ART: AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.61). The strongest effectors of prematurity were placental problems (LPTB: AOR 4.02; EPTB: AOR 10.28), pregnancy hypertension (LPTB: AOR 2.14; EPTB: AOR 2.88), and chronic hypertension (LPTB: AOR 1.85; EPTB: AOR 2.79). Mediation analysis demonstrated a statistically significant indirect effect of placental problems for ART and subfertility. CONCLUSION: The greatest effectors of prematurity were placental problems and hypertensive disorders. ART and, to a lesser extent, subfertility were both associated with preterm birth directly and indirectly mediated by placenta problems.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the maternal demographic, health, and fertility variables underlying prematurity. DESIGN: Retrospective: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data linked to Massachusetts birth certificates and hospital stays. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: We included 166,963 privately insured, singleton, first births to women ≥18 years of age between 2004 and 2013. Deliveries were as follows: assisted reproductive technology (ART) when linked to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, medically assisted reproduction (MAR) when fertility treatment was indicated on the birth certificate, unassisted subfertile (USF) when there were indications of subfertility but no treatment, and fertile if none of the above. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Late preterm birth (LPTB; 34-36 weeks) and early preterm birth (EPTB; <34 weeks) were compared with term deliveries (≥37 weeks). Covariates that statistically significantly influenced prematurity in binary analysis were modeled by using multinomial logistic regression. Backward elimination and mediation analysis were used to determine the influence of single parameters on outcomes of others. RESULTS:LPTB was increased in the USF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.65) and ART (AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.56) but not MAR (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.37). ETPB was increased in all (USF: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-2.31; MAR: AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12; ART: AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.61). The strongest effectors of prematurity were placental problems (LPTB: AOR 4.02; EPTB: AOR 10.28), pregnancy hypertension (LPTB: AOR 2.14; EPTB: AOR 2.88), and chronic hypertension (LPTB: AOR 1.85; EPTB: AOR 2.79). Mediation analysis demonstrated a statistically significant indirect effect of placental problems for ART and subfertility. CONCLUSION: The greatest effectors of prematurity were placental problems and hypertensive disorders. ART and, to a lesser extent, subfertility were both associated with preterm birth directly and indirectly mediated by placenta problems.
Authors: Julia F Litzky; Maya A Deyssenroth; Todd M Everson; David A Armstrong; Luca Lambertini; Jia Chen; Carmen J Marsit Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Michael Tobias; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Hafsatou Diop Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Galit Levi Dunietz; Claudia Holzman; Patricia McKane; Chenxi Li; Sheree L Boulet; David Todem; Dmitry M Kissin; Glenn Copeland; Dana Bernson; William M Sappenfield; Michael P Diamond Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Laura A Schieve; Cynthia Ferre; Herbert B Peterson; Maurizio Macaluso; Meredith A Reynolds; Victoria C Wright Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Juan E Castillo-Fernandez; Yuk Jing Loke; Sebastian Bass-Stringer; Fei Gao; Yudong Xia; Honglong Wu; Hanlin Lu; Yuan Liu; Jun Wang; Tim D Spector; Richard Saffery; Jeffrey M Craig; Jordana T Bell Journal: Genome Med Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Sunah S Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Leslie V Farland; Hafsatou Diop; Charles C Coddington; Howard Cabral Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 4.241