Literature DB >> 28399551

Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients Treated Surgically for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Subanalysis of the 8-year Data From the SPORT Trial.

Michael C Gerling1, Dante Leven1,2, Peter G Passias1, Virginie Lafage1, Kristina Bianco1, Alexandra Lee1, Tamara S Morgan3,4, Jon D Lurie3,4, Tor D Tosteson3,4, Wenyan Zhao3,4, Kevin F Spratt3,4, Kristen Radcliff5, Thomas J Errico1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospective data from the degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) arm of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for DS and compare outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation with nonreoperative patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have examined outcomes following surgery for DS, but few have identified risk factors for reoperation.
METHODS: Analysis included patients with neurogenic claudication (>12 weeks), clinical neurological signs, spinal stenosis, and DS on standing lateral x-rays. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate patient characteristics and risk factors. Treatment effects (TEs) were calculated and compared between study groups.
RESULTS: Of 406 patients, 72% underwent instrumented fusion, 21% noninstrumented fusion, and 7% decompression alone. At 8 years, the reoperation rate was 22%, of which 28% occurred within 1 year, 54% within 2 years, 70% within 4 years, and 86% within 6 years. The reasons for reoperation included recurrent stenosis or progressive spondylolisthesis (45%), complications such as hematoma, dehiscence, or infection (36%), or new condition (14%). Reoperative patients were younger (62.2 vs. 65.3, P = 0.008). Significant risk factors were use of antidepressants (P = 0.008, hazard ratio [HR] 2.08) or having no neurogenic claudication upon enrollment (P = 0.02, HR 1.82). Patients who were smokers, diabetics, obese, or on workman's compensation were not at greater risk for reoperation. At 8-year follow-up, scores for SF-36 bodily pain (BP), Oswestry Disability Index, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/Modems version (ODI), and stenosis frequency index were better in nonreoperative patients. TE favored nonreoperative patients for SF-36 BP, physical function, ODI, Stenosis Bothersomeness Index, and satisfaction with symptoms (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of reoperation for patients with DS was 22% 8 years following surgery. Patients with a history of no neurogenic claudication and patients taking antidepressants were more likely to undergo reoperation. Outcome scores and TE were more favorable in nonreoperative patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28399551      PMCID: PMC5633486          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.241


  22 in total

Review 1.  Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul Park; Hugh J Garton; Vishal C Gala; Julian T Hoff; John E McGillicuddy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Patrick R Olson; Kristen K Bronner; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz; L T Kurz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily Blood; Brett Hanscom; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis.

Authors:  Martin B Kornblum; Jeffrey S Fischgrund; Harry N Herkowitz; David A Abraham; David L Berkower; Jeff S Ditkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Sung-Woo Lee; Young-Joon Ahn; Yung-Tae Kim; Dong-Ho Lee; Mi Young Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Emily A Blood; Anna N A Tosteson; Nancy Birkmeyer; Harry Herkowitz; Michael Longley; Lawrence Lenke; Sanford Emery; Serena S Hu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing.

Authors:  James M Mok; Jordan M Cloyd; David S Bradford; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren; Jason A Smith; Bobby Tay; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Current Concepts and New Evidence.

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Harold G Moore; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

3.  Slip progression in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis following minimally invasive decompression surgery is not associated with increased functional disability.

Authors:  Robert A Ravinsky; Eric J Crawford; Luke A Reda; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study and Two-Dimensional Operative Video.

Authors:  Olivia E Gilbert; Sarah E Lawhon; Twila L Gaston; Jared M Robichaux; Gabriel Claudiu Tender
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.948

5.  Management of symptomatic degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Nick Evans; Michael McCarthy
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-12-19

6.  Analysis of lumbar lateral instability on upright left and right bending radiographs in symptomatic patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Xin-Wen Wang; Xi Chen; Yang Fu; Xiao Chen; Feng Zhang; Hai-Ping Cai; Chang Ge; Wen-Zhi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The prevalence of complications associated with lumbar and thoracic spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Colleen Smith; Nayan Lamba; Zhonghui Ou; Quynh-Anh Vo; Lita Araujo-Lama; Sanghee Lim; Dhaivat Joshi; Joanne Doucette; Stefania Papatheodorou; Ian Tafel; Linda S Aglio; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan Zaidi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  Epidural Steroid Injections for Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Little Effect on Clinical Outcomes in Operatively and Nonoperatively Treated Patients.

Authors:  Michael C Gerling; Cole Bortz; Katherine E Pierce; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Peter G Passias
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  Complications rate of and risk factors for the unplanned reoperation of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly patients: a retrospective single-Centre cohort study of 33 patients.

Authors:  Weiyang Zhong; Xinjie Liang; Xiaoji Luo; Tianji Huang; Zhengxue Quan
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Isthmic Spondylolisthesis is Associated with Less Revisions for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Spine Fusion Than Degenerative Spinal Conditions: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Leevi A Toivonen; Heikki Mäntymäki; Arja Häkkinen; Hannu Kautiainen; Marko H Neva
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.