Literature DB >> 19365253

Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing.

James M Mok1, Jordan M Cloyd, David S Bradford, Serena S Hu, Vedat Deviren, Jason A Smith, Bobby Tay, Sigurd H Berven.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing primary fusion with segmental fixation for adult spinal deformity.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the survivorship of primary fusion for adult spinal deformity and identify patient-specific predictors of complications requiring reoperation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compared with the adolescent population, surgery for adult deformity is often more complex and technically difficult, contributing to a high reported rate of complications that can result in the need for reoperation. Reported complication rates vary widely.
METHODS: From 1999-2004 all patients who underwent primary instrumented fusion for nonparalytic adult spinal deformity at a single center were included. Inclusion criteria included minimum age at surgery of 20 years and minimum fusion length of 4 motion segments. Surgical, demographic, and comorbidity data were recorded. Reoperation was defined as any additional surgery involving levels of the spine operated on during the index procedure and/or adjacent levels. Comparisons were performed between patients who required reoperation and those who did not.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Endpoint (minimum 2 years follow-up or reoperation) was reached for 91%. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years. Cumulative reoperation rate was 25.8%. Survival was 86.4% at 1 year, 77.2% at 2 years, and 75.2% at 3 years. Reasons for reoperation included infection (n = 8), pseudarthrosis (n = 3), adjacent segment problems (n = 5), implant failure (n = 4), and removal of painful implants (n = 3). Multivariate analysis showed smoking was significantly higher in the reoperation group.
CONCLUSION: Using a strict definition of reoperation for a well-defined cohort, in the presence of relevant risk factors, many patients undergoing primary fusion for adult spinal deformity required reoperation. The results indicate that complex medical and surgical factors contribute to the treatment challenges posed by patients with adult spinal deformity. This represents the largest cohort reported to date of patients undergoing primary fusion using third-generation instrumentation techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19365253     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819f2080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Adam S Kanter; Bryan D Bolinger; Gregory M Mundis; Stacie Nguyen; Praveen V Mummaneni; Neel Anand; Richard G Fessler; Peter G Passias; Paul Park; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Michael Y Wang; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Christopher I Shaffrey; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Stem cells for spine surgery.

Authors:  Joshua Schroeder; Janina Kueper; Kaplan Leon; Meir Liebergall
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of F. Sanchez-Mariscal et al. concerning "Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years" by G. Riouallon et al. (Eur Spine J; 2016;25(8):2527-2534).

Authors:  Guillaume Riouallon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Revision spine surgery in patients without clinical signs of infection: How often are there occult infections in removed hardware?

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Relationship between sagittal balance and adjacent segment disease in surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: meta-analysis and implications for choice of fusion technique.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alexander Nazareth; Awais K Hussain; Adam A Dmytriw; Mithun Nambiar; Damian Nguyen; Jack Kerferd; Steven Phan; Chet Sutterlin; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Infections after spinal correction and fusion for spinal deformities in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Manon Bachy; Benjamin Bouyer; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years.

Authors:  Guillaume Riouallon; Benjamin Bouyer; Stéphane Wolff
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

10.  The outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation removal for ongoing low back pain following posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Mario G Zotti; Oscar P Brumby-Rendell; Ben McDonald; Tom Fisher; Christovalantis Tsimiklis; Wai Weng Yoon; Orso L Osti
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.