Literature DB >> 28399111

Comment on 'Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study'.

Anthony B Miller1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28399111      PMCID: PMC5520504          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Johns reported ‘a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP (UK NHS breast screening programme) activity’. The term ‘associated’ is appropriate as there was uncontrolled confounding with treatment and better breast cancer management. The UK breast screening programme could not be introduced everywhere at once because the facilities were not available everywhere. The initial areas included had to have been selected because they already had the necessary diagnostic and treatment facilities and expertise, hence better treatment. And since, as better treatment is the dominant cause of the fall in breast cancer mortality seen since 1990 in many countries, including the UK (Jatoi and Miller, 2003), that must have been largely responsible for the differences seen by Johns . As we demonstrated in Canada (Miller , 1992b, 2000, 2002, 2014), it is not possible to demonstrate a reduction in breast cancer mortality due to mammography screening in an era of modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Those observational studies that attempt to do so cannot escape bias and confounding – even those studies that perform complicated approaches to adjustment for selection bias (e.g., that of Morrell ). This fact, together with the acknowledged complications from mammography screening, especially from overdiagnosis (Baines ), should lead us to re-consider screening with mammography, and instead concentrate on the simpler approach the World Health Organization (WHO) defines as early diagnosis of breast cancer (WHO, 2017), namely ‘the early identification of cancer in patients who have symptoms of the disease’. WHO (2017) distinguishes between screening and early diagnosis of cancer, both resulting in early detection of cancer. Early diagnosis is probably best understood as what is now called ‘breast awareness’: encouraging women by public education to be aware of the appearance and feel of their breasts, and if she detects an abnormality in her breast to seek skilled examination by physicians who know the signs of early breast cancer, followed by appropriate diagnostic tests – diagnostic mammography and/or ultrasound.
  9 in total

1.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; T To; C J Baines; C Wall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Why is breast-cancer mortality declining?

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Anthony B Miller
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Teresa To; Cornelia J Baines; Claus Wall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Revised estimates of overdiagnosis from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  Cornelia J Baines; Teresa To; Anthony B Miller
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study.

Authors:  Louise E Johns; Derek A Coleman; Anthony J Swerdlow; Susan M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.

Authors:  Stephen Morrell; Richard Taylor; David Roder; Bridget Robson; Marli Gregory; Kirsty Craig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reply to 'Comment on 'Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study''.

Authors:  Stephen Morrell; David Roder; Richard Taylor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 7.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.