Alex Weller1, Marianthi Vasiliki Papoutsaki2, John C Waterton3, Arturo Chiti4, Sigrid Stroobants5, Joost Kuijer6, Matthew Blackledge2, Veronica Morgan7, Nandita M deSouza2. 1. CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK. alex.weller@icr.ac.uk. 2. CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK. 3. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 4. Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. 5. Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium. 6. Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest repeatability of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements across institutions and MRI vendors, plus investigate the effect of post-processing methodology on measurement precision. METHODS: Thirty malignant lung lesions >2 cm in size (23 patients) were scanned on two occasions, using echo-planar-Diffusion-Weighted (DW)-MRI to derive whole-tumour ADC (b = 100, 500 and 800smm-2). Scanning was performed at 4 institutions (3 MRI vendors). Whole-tumour volumes-of-interest were copied from first visit onto second visit images and from one post-processing platform to an open-source platform, to assess ADC repeatability and cross-platform reproducibility. RESULTS: Whole-tumour ADC values ranged from 0.66-1.94x10-3mm2s-1 (mean = 1.14). Within-patient coefficient-of-variation (wCV) was 7.1% (95% CI 5.7-9.6%), limits-of-agreement (LoA) -18.0 to 21.9%. Lesions >3 cm had improved repeatability: wCV 3.9% (95% CI 2.9-5.9%); and LoA -10.2 to 11.4%. Variability for lesions <3 cm was 2.46 times higher. ADC reproducibility across different post-processing platforms was excellent: Pearson's R2 = 0.99; CoV 2.8% (95% CI 2.3-3.4%); and LoA -7.4 to 8.0%. CONCLUSION: A free-breathing DW-MRI protocol for imaging malignant lung tumours achieved satisfactory within-patient repeatability and was robust to changes in post-processing software, justifying its use in multi-centre trials. For response evaluation in individual patients, a change in ADC >21.9% will reflect treatment-related change. KEY POINTS: • In lung cancer, free-breathing DWI-MRI produces acceptable images with evaluable ADC measurement. • ADC repeatability coefficient-of-variation is 7.1% for lung tumours >2 cm. • ADC repeatability coefficient-of-variation is 3.9% for lung tumours >3 cm. • ADC measurement precision is unaffected by the post-processing software used. • In multicentre trials, 22% increase in ADC indicates positive treatment response.
PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest repeatability of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements across institutions and MRI vendors, plus investigate the effect of post-processing methodology on measurement precision. METHODS: Thirty malignant lung lesions >2 cm in size (23 patients) were scanned on two occasions, using echo-planar-Diffusion-Weighted (DW)-MRI to derive whole-tumour ADC (b = 100, 500 and 800smm-2). Scanning was performed at 4 institutions (3 MRI vendors). Whole-tumour volumes-of-interest were copied from first visit onto second visit images and from one post-processing platform to an open-source platform, to assess ADC repeatability and cross-platform reproducibility. RESULTS: Whole-tumour ADC values ranged from 0.66-1.94x10-3mm2s-1 (mean = 1.14). Within-patient coefficient-of-variation (wCV) was 7.1% (95% CI 5.7-9.6%), limits-of-agreement (LoA) -18.0 to 21.9%. Lesions >3 cm had improved repeatability: wCV 3.9% (95% CI 2.9-5.9%); and LoA -10.2 to 11.4%. Variability for lesions <3 cm was 2.46 times higher. ADC reproducibility across different post-processing platforms was excellent: Pearson's R2 = 0.99; CoV 2.8% (95% CI 2.3-3.4%); and LoA -7.4 to 8.0%. CONCLUSION: A free-breathing DW-MRI protocol for imaging malignant lung tumours achieved satisfactory within-patient repeatability and was robust to changes in post-processing software, justifying its use in multi-centre trials. For response evaluation in individual patients, a change in ADC >21.9% will reflect treatment-related change. KEY POINTS: • In lung cancer, free-breathing DWI-MRI produces acceptable images with evaluable ADC measurement. • ADC repeatability coefficient-of-variation is 7.1% for lung tumours >2 cm. • ADC repeatability coefficient-of-variation is 3.9% for lung tumours >3 cm. • ADC measurement precision is unaffected by the post-processing software used. • In multicentre trials, 22% increase in ADC indicates positive treatment response.
Authors: Ek T Tan; Luca Marinelli; Zachary W Slavens; Kevin F King; Christopher J Hardy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: M Regier; T Derlin; D Schwarz; A Laqmani; F O Henes; M Groth; J-H Buhk; H Kooijman; G Adam Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: L Bernardin; N H M Douglas; D J Collins; S L Giles; E A M O'Flynn; M Orton; N M deSouza Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mihaela Rata; David J Collins; James Darcy; Christina Messiou; Nina Tunariu; Nandita Desouza; Helen Young; Martin O Leach; Matthew R Orton Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jana Taron; Christina Schraml; Christina Pfannenberg; Matthias Reimold; Nina Schwenzer; Konstantin Nikolaou; Petros Martirosian; Ferdinand Seith Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Kathryn E Keenan; Jana G Delfino; Kalina V Jordanova; Megan E Poorman; Prathyush Chirra; Akshay S Chaudhari; Bettina Baessler; Jessica Winfield; Satish E Viswanath; Nandita M deSouza Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Jurgen Peerlings; Henry C Woodruff; Jessica M Winfield; Abdalla Ibrahim; Bernard E Van Beers; Arend Heerschap; Alan Jackson; Joachim E Wildberger; Felix M Mottaghy; Nandita M DeSouza; Philippe Lambin Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Amita Shukla-Dave; Nancy A Obuchowski; Thomas L Chenevert; Sachin Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dariya Malyarenko; Wei Huang; Susan M Noworolski; Robert J Young; Mark S Shiroishi; Harrison Kim; Catherine Coolens; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Mark Rosen; Michael Boss; Edward F Jackson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 5.119