Literature DB >> 26678215

A risk management approach for imaging biomarker-driven clinical trials in oncology.

Yan Liu1, Nandita M deSouza2, Lalitha K Shankar3, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor4, Siegfried Trattnig5, Sandra Collette6, Arturo Chiti7.   

Abstract

Imaging has steadily evolved in clinical cancer research as a result of improved conventional imaging methods and the innovation of new functional and molecular imaging techniques. Despite this evolution, the design and data quality derived from imaging within clinical trials are not ideal and gaps exist with paucity of optimised methods, constraints of trial operational support, and scarce resources. Difficulties associated with integrating imaging biomarkers into trials have been neglected compared with inclusion of tissue and blood biomarkers, largely because of inherent challenges in the complexity of imaging technologies, safety issues related to new imaging contrast media, standardisation of image acquisition across multivendor platforms, and various postprocessing options available with advanced software. Ignorance of these pitfalls directly affects the quality of the imaging read-out, leading to trial failure, particularly when imaging is a primary endpoint. Therefore, we propose a practical risk-based framework and recommendations for trials driven by imaging biomarkers, which allow identification of risks at trial initiation to better allocate resources and prioritise key tasks.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678215     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00164-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  5 in total

Review 1.  Using PET for therapy monitoring in oncological clinical trials: challenges ahead.

Authors:  C M Deroose; S Stroobants; Y Liu; L K Shankar; P Bourguet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI in lung cancers: ADC test-retest repeatability.

Authors:  Alex Weller; Marianthi Vasiliki Papoutsaki; John C Waterton; Arturo Chiti; Sigrid Stroobants; Joost Kuijer; Matthew Blackledge; Veronica Morgan; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  SPECT and PET radiopharmaceuticals for molecular imaging of apoptosis: from bench to clinic.

Authors:  Xiaobo Wang; Han Feng; Shichao Zhao; Junling Xu; Xinyu Wu; Jing Cui; Ying Zhang; Yuhua Qin; Zhiguo Liu; Tang Gao; Yongju Gao; Wenbin Zeng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 4.  Implementing diffusion-weighted MRI for body imaging in prospective multicentre trials: current considerations and future perspectives.

Authors:  N M deSouza; J M Winfield; J C Waterton; A Weller; M-V Papoutsaki; S J Doran; D J Collins; L Fournier; D Sullivan; T Chenevert; A Jackson; M Boss; S Trattnig; Y Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Repeatability of Quantitative Imaging Features in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Hong Lu; Nestor A Parra; Jin Qi; Kenneth Gage; Qian Li; Shuxuan Fan; Sebastian Feuerlein; Julio Pow-Sang; Robert Gillies; Jung W Choi; Yoganand Balagurunathan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.