Literature DB >> 28396955

Crura augmentation with Bio-A® mesh for laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia: single-institution experience with 100 consecutive patients.

E Asti1, A Sironi1, G Bonitta1, A Lovece1, P Milito1, L Bonavina2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential utility of both non-absorbable and absorbable meshes to reinforce the esophageal hiatus and prevent recurrent hernia has been investigated in observational studies and a few randomized clinical trials. Use of absorbable mesh has been associated with lesser side-effects, but the long-term safety and effectiveness are still debated. This rather scanty clinical evidence is due to heterogeneity and bias regarding the type of mesh and operation used, the modalities of follow-up, and the reporting of objective results.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess safety, quality of life, and recurrence-free probability after laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia reinforced with a synthetic absorbable mesh.
METHODS: Observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study. All patients with hiatal hernia who underwent laparoscopic crura repair using a biosynthetic mesh (Gore Bio A® tissue reinforcement, Flagstaff, AZ) were included. Pre- and post-operative symptoms were assessed with the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Objective follow-up consisted of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study.
RESULTS: From September 2011 to March 2016, a total of 100 patients underwent hiatal hernia repair using a Bio-A® mesh. All surgical procedures were completed laparoscopically. Postoperative morbidity rate was 10%. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months, and the median follow-up was 30 (IQR = 22) months. No mesh-related complications occurred. The incidence of recurrent hernia ≥2 cm was 9%, and eight of the nine patients had a preoperative type III hernia. The median GERD-HRQL score was significantly reduced after operation (p < 0.001). The recurrence-free probability at 1 and 5 years was, respectively, 0.99 (CI 0.97-1.00) and 0.84 (CI 0.74-0.97), and no reoperation was required. No association was found between age, BMI, hernia size, previously failed surgical repairs and hernia recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a synthetic absorbable mesh to reinforce the esophageal hiatus is safe and appears to be effective and durable over a medium-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundoplication; Hiatus hernia; Laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair; Recurrent hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28396955     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1603-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  20 in total

Review 1.  Lower recurrence rates after mesh-reinforced versus simple hiatal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.

Authors:  M Hashemi; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; J E Huprich; M Quek; J A Hagen; P F Crookes; J Theisen; S R DeMeester; L F Sillin; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Mark A Carlson; Sofronis Loizides; Anastasia Papafili; Mihn Luu; Jacob Roberts; Tallal Zeni; Alexander Frantzides
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Carlos A Pellegrini; John Hunter; Nathaniel Soper; Michael Brunt; Brett Sheppard; Blair Jobe; Nayak Polissar; Lee Mitsumori; James Nelson; L Swanstrom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David I Watson; Sarah K Thompson; Peter G Devitt; Lorelle Smith; Simon D Woods; Ahmad Aly; Susan Gan; Philip A Game; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  The history of hiatal hernia surgery: from Bowditch to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Stylopoulos; David W Rattner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series.

Authors:  Rudolf J Stadlhuber; Amr El Sherif; Sumeet K Mittal; Robert J Fitzgibbons; L Michael Brunt; John G Hunter; Tom R Demeester; Lee L Swanstrom; C Daniel Smith; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Beat P Müller-Stich; Hannes G Kenngott; Matthias Gondan; Christian Stock; Georg R Linke; Franziska Fritz; Felix Nickel; Markus K Diener; Carsten N Gutt; Moritz Wente; Markus W Büchler; Lars Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Reversibility of cardiopulmonary impairment after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Luigi Bonavina; Massimo Lombardi; Francesco Bandera; Francesco Secchi; Marco Guazzi
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of a giant hiatal hernia after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  F Marchesi; G Dalmonte; A Morini; A Annicchiarico
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement.

Authors:  Angelo Iossa; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp; Ali M Kara; Paul J Nguyen-Lee; Hani M Annabi; Luis Alvarado; John D Marr; Omar M Ghanem; Brian Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Medium-term safety and efficacy profile of paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST® mesh: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; A Sozzi; F Lombardo; A Lanzaro; V Panizzo; G Bonitta; P Mendogni; P G Bruni; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.920

5.  Primary paraesophageal hernia repair with Gore® Bio-A® tissue reinforcement: long-term outcomes and association of BMI and recurrence.

Authors:  Michael T Olson; Saurabh Singhal; Roshan Panchanathan; Sreeja Biswas Roy; Paul Kang; Taylor Ipsen; Sumeet K Mittal; Jasmine L Huang; Michael A Smith; Ross M Bremner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Use of absorbable meshes in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Bernabé M Quesada; Adelina E Coturel
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-10-27

Review 7.  Paraesophageal hernia: to fundoplicate or not?

Authors:  Daniel Solomon; Eliahu Bekhor; Hanoch Kashtan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

8.  Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Saino; A Sozzi; G Bonitta; G Micheletto; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.739

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.