Background: Bisphenol A (BPA) toxicity and exposure risk to humans has been the subject of considerable scientific debate; however, published occupational exposure data for BPA are limited. Methods: In 2013-2014, 77 workers at six US companies making BPA, BPA-based resins, or BPA-filled wax provided seven urine samples over two consecutive work days (151 worker-days, 525 samples). Participant information included industry, job, tasks, personal protective equipment used, hygiene behaviors, and canned food/beverage consumption. Total (free plus conjugated) BPA, quantified in urine by mass spectrometry, was detected in all samples. Results: The geometric mean (GM) creatinine-adjusted total BPA (total BPACR) concentration was 88.0 µg g-1 (range 0.78-18900 µg g-1), ~70 times higher than in US adults in 2013-2014 (1.27 µg g-1). GM total BPACR increased during Day 1 (26.6-127 µg g-1), decreased by pre-shift Day 2 (84.4 µg g-1) then increased during Day 2 to 178 µg g-1. By industry, baseline and post-baseline total BPACR was highest in BPA-filled wax manufacturing/reclaim (GM = 111 µg g-1) and lowest in phenolic resin manufacturing (GM = 6.56 µg g-1). By job, total BPACR was highest at baseline in maintenance workers (GM = 157 µg g-1) and post-baseline in those working with molten BPA-filled wax (GM = 441 µg g-1). Workers in the job of flaking a BPA-based resin had the lowest concentrations at baseline (GM = 4.81 µg g-1) and post-baseline (GM = 23.2 µg g-1). In multiple regression models, at baseline, industry significantly predicted increased total BPACR (P = 0.0248); post-baseline, handling BPA containers (P = 0.0035), taking ≥3 process/bulk samples with BPA (P = 0.0002) and wearing a Tyvek® coverall (P = 0.0042) significantly predicted increased total BPACR (after adjusting for total BPACR at baseline, time point, and body mass index). Conclusion: Several work-related factors, including industry, job, and certain tasks performed, were associated with increased urinary total BPACR concentrations in this group of manufacturing workers. The potential for BPA-related health effects among these workers is unknown. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society 2017.
Background: Bisphenol A (BPA) toxicity and exposure risk to humans has been the subject of considerable scientific debate; however, published occupational exposure data for BPA are limited. Methods: In 2013-2014, 77 workers at six US companies making BPA, BPA-based resins, or BPA-filled wax provided seven urine samples over two consecutive work days (151 worker-days, 525 samples). Participant information included industry, job, tasks, personal protective equipment used, hygiene behaviors, and canned food/beverage consumption. Total (free plus conjugated) BPA, quantified in urine by mass spectrometry, was detected in all samples. Results: The geometric mean (GM) creatinine-adjusted total BPA (total BPACR) concentration was 88.0 µg g-1 (range 0.78-18900 µg g-1), ~70 times higher than in US adults in 2013-2014 (1.27 µg g-1). GM total BPACR increased during Day 1 (26.6-127 µg g-1), decreased by pre-shift Day 2 (84.4 µg g-1) then increased during Day 2 to 178 µg g-1. By industry, baseline and post-baseline total BPACR was highest in BPA-filled wax manufacturing/reclaim (GM = 111 µg g-1) and lowest in phenolic resin manufacturing (GM = 6.56 µg g-1). By job, total BPACR was highest at baseline in maintenance workers (GM = 157 µg g-1) and post-baseline in those working with molten BPA-filled wax (GM = 441 µg g-1). Workers in the job of flaking a BPA-based resin had the lowest concentrations at baseline (GM = 4.81 µg g-1) and post-baseline (GM = 23.2 µg g-1). In multiple regression models, at baseline, industry significantly predicted increased total BPACR (P = 0.0248); post-baseline, handling BPA containers (P = 0.0035), taking ≥3 process/bulk samples with BPA (P = 0.0002) and wearing a Tyvek® coverall (P = 0.0042) significantly predicted increased total BPACR (after adjusting for total BPACR at baseline, time point, and body mass index). Conclusion: Several work-related factors, including industry, job, and certain tasks performed, were associated with increased urinary total BPACR concentrations in this group of manufacturing workers. The potential for BPA-related health effects among these workers is unknown. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society 2017.
Authors: Wolfgang Völkel; Thomas Colnot; György A Csanády; Johannes G Filser; Wolfgang Dekant Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: G A Csanády; H R Oberste-Frielinghaus; B Semder; C Baur; K T Schneider; J G Filser Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2002-04-25 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Sarah Zulkifli; Noor Shafina Mohd Nor; Siti Hamimah Sheikh Abdul Kadir; Norashikin Mohd Ranai; Noor Kaslina Mohd Kornain; Wan Nor I'zzah Wan Mohd Zain; Mardiana Abdul Aziz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Jerrold J Heindel; Sarah Howard; Keren Agay-Shay; Juan P Arrebola; Karine Audouze; Patrick J Babin; Robert Barouki; Amita Bansal; Etienne Blanc; Matthew C Cave; Saurabh Chatterjee; Nicolas Chevalier; Mahua Choudhury; David Collier; Lisa Connolly; Xavier Coumoul; Gabriella Garruti; Michael Gilbertson; Lori A Hoepner; Alison C Holloway; George Howell; Christopher D Kassotis; Mathew K Kay; Min Ji Kim; Dominique Lagadic-Gossmann; Sophie Langouet; Antoine Legrand; Zhuorui Li; Helene Le Mentec; Lars Lind; P Monica Lind; Robert H Lustig; Corinne Martin-Chouly; Vesna Munic Kos; Normand Podechard; Troy A Roepke; Robert M Sargis; Anne Starling; Craig R Tomlinson; Charbel Touma; Jan Vondracek; Frederick Vom Saal; Bruce Blumberg Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 6.100
Authors: Cynthia J Hines; Annette L Christianson; Matthew V Jackson; Xiaoyun Ye; Jack R Pretty; James E Arnold; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Tristan M Nicholson; Jalissa L Nguyen; Glen E Leverson; Julia A Taylor; Frederick S Vom Saal; Ronald W Wood; William A Ricke Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2018-07-18
Authors: Kristen S Uchtmann; Julia A Taylor; Barry G Timms; Richard W Stahlhut; Emily A Ricke; Mark R Ellersieck; Frederick S Vom Saal; William A Ricke Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Shaina L Stacy; George D Papandonatos; Antonia M Calafat; Aimin Chen; Kimberly Yolton; Bruce P Lanphear; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Abishankari Rajkumar; Trang Luu; Marc A Beal; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Bernard Robaire; Barbara F Hales Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Sabrina Villar-Pazos; Juan Martinez-Pinna; Manuel Castellano-Muñoz; Paloma Alonso-Magdalena; Laura Marroqui; Ivan Quesada; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Angel Nadal Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Gail S Prins; Shu-Hua Ye; Lynn Birch; Xiang Zhang; Ana Cheong; Han Lin; Esther Calderon-Gierszal; Jacob Groen; Wen-Yang Hu; Shuk-Mei Ho; Richard B van Breemen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 9.031