| Literature DB >> 28728135 |
Gail S Prins1,2, Shu-Hua Ye1, Lynn Birch1, Xiang Zhang3, Ana Cheong3, Han Lin1, Esther Calderon-Gierszal1, Jacob Groen1, Wen-Yang Hu1, Shuk-Mei Ho3,4,5, Richard B van Breemen6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have uncovered heightened prostatic susceptibility to hormone-induced neoplasia from early-life exposure to low-dose bisphenol A (BPA). However, significant data gaps remain that are essential to address for biological relevance and necessary risk assessment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28728135 PMCID: PMC5744650 DOI: 10.1289/EHP1050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Serum BPA levels in individual d 3 rats quantitated by UHPLC-MS-MS.
| Treatment ( | BPA Concentration (ng/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Free BPA | G-BPA | Total BPA | |
| Vehicle | |||
| 0.1 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 100 | |||
| 5000 | |||
Note: BPA in oil administered by subcutaneous injection. Serum collected at 1 h via tail vein. ; ; G-BPA, glucuronidated BPA; LOD, limit of detection; LLOQ, lower limit of quantitation.
.
Figure 1.Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) scores (0–3 scale), % proliferation () and % apoptosis (TUNEL labeling) in the lateral, dorsal and ventral prostate lobes and periurethral prostate ducts at d 200. Rats were treated neonatally with vehicle, low-dose , high-dose and increasing doses of BPA on d 1, 3, and 5 of life. All rats were given implants at d 90 to drive hormonal carcinogenesis. . and vs, neonatal vehicle within each lobe.
Lateral prostate (T&E) pathology in d-200 rats.
| PIN | Hyperplasia | Inflammation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Incidence | Score | Incidence | Score | Incidence | ||
| 0.3 | 20% | 0% | 0.90 | 40% | 0.00 | 0% | |
| 1.46 | 67% | 33% | 1.10 | 60% | 0.89 | 67% | |
| Low | 1.18 | 62% | 25% | 0.38 | 25% | 1.38 | 75% |
| High | 2.46 | 91% | 73% | 0.73 | 64% | 2.00 | 100% |
| 0.1 BPA | 2.54 | 100% | 70% | 0.80 | 60% | 1.70 | 90% |
| 1.0 BPA | 2.27 | 89% | 56% | 0.56 | 67% | 1.33 | 89% |
| 10 BPA | 2.54 | 100% | 67% | 0.67 | 56% | 2.22 | 100% |
| 100 BPA | 2.18 | 75% | 62% | 0.62 | 38% | 1.25 | 50% |
| 5K BPA | 2.75 | 90% | 80% | 0.80 | 80% | 1.90 | 100% |
| ( | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
| ( | |||||||
| ( | |||||||
Note: Scores were analyzed by ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett multiple comparisons.
Incidence was analyzed by chi-square and Fischer’s exact test.
All PIN includes tissues with 1, 2, or 3 PIN scores.
HGPIN includes only 2 and 3 PIN scores. ; NS, nonsignificant.
Figure 2.Prostatic histopathology lesions at d 365 in the lateral lobe (A–G) and periurethral prostate ducts (H) of rats treated neonatally with and implants at d 90. Examples of HG-PIN and in situ carcinoma (A,C) and local microinvasion of epithelium into stroma (B,D, arrows) were observed in the majority of treated lateral prostates. Focal regions of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (arrowheads in E, 10 and F, 20 of same region and G from a different lateral lobe) were seen in several lateral prostates as evidenced by irregular small glandular structures within stroma with abortive glandular lumens, back-to-back lumens and loss of basement membranes (arrowheads). Regions of adenocarcinoma were also noted in periurethral prostatic ducts (H, arrowheads). A–D, F–H, same magnification as G with ; .
Lateral prostate (T&E) pathology in aged (d 365) rats.
| PIN | Carcinoma-Microinvasion | Carcinoma- Glandular | Inflammation | Hyperplasia | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Incidence | Incidence | Incidence | Score | Incidence | Score | Incidence | ||||
| Vehicle Empty | 0.12 | 1/17 | 6% | 0/17 | 0% | 0/17 | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0.76 | 47% |
| Vehicle T&E | 1.50 | 15/18 | 83% | 3/18 | 17% | 0/18 | 0% | 1.28 | 78% | 0.50 | 39% |
| Lo | 2.00 | 12/14 | 86% | 6/14 | 43% | 1/14 | 7% | 1.14 | 71% | 0.86 | 57% |
| Hi | 2.50 | 24/26 | 92% | 15/26 | 58% | 6/26 | 23% | 1.77 | 77% | 1.81 | 88% |
| BPA 10 T&E | 2.48 | 20/21 | 95% | 13/21 | 62% | 3/21 | 14% | 1.43 | 95% | 0.67 | 52% |
| ( | |||||||||||
| ( | NS | NS | NS | ||||||||
Note: Scores were analyzed by ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett multiple comparison.
Incidence was analyzed by chi-square and Fischer’s exact Test. . NS, nonsignificant.
Figure 3.Dose–response analysis of promoter DNA methylation patterns of five previously identified /BPA reprogramed rat prostate genes (Cheong et al. 2016). A) Promoter methylation at each CpG site is expressed as from four to five samples/group with for each BPA dose, treatment and vehicle control. The exception is Creb3/4 of which bisulfite sequencing analysis was performed on pooled samples () with six clones/sample. B) Mean % methylation of all promoter-region CpG sites combined across the separate doses. The dotted line represents the vehicle control total promoter % methylation for comparison.