Literature DB >> 29679181

Essential learning tools for continuing medical education for physicians, geneticists, nurses, allied health professionals, mental health professionals, business administration professionals, and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellows: the Midwest Reproductive Symposium International.

Gretchen G Collins1, Roohi Jeelani1, Angeline Beltsos1, William G Kearns2,3.   

Abstract

Essential learning tools for continuing medical education are a challenge in today's rapidly evolving field of reproductive medicine. The Midwest Reproductive Symposium International (MRSi) is a yearly conference held in Chicago, IL. The conference is targeted toward physicians, geneticists, nurses, allied health professionals, mental health professionals, business administration professionals, and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellows engaged in the practice of reproductive medicine. In addition to the scientific conference agenda, there are specific sessions for nurses, mental health professionals, and REI fellows. Unique to the MRSi conference, there is also a separate "Business Minds" session to provide education on business acumen as it is an important element to running a department, division, or private clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continual medical education; Embryologists; Geneticists; Infertility providers; Mental health; Reproductive endocrinologists; The Midwest Reproductive Symposium International

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679181      PMCID: PMC5949121          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1182-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  13 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprints as a model for the analysis of epigenetic stability during assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Michelle M Denomme; Mellissa R W Mann
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  The experience of 3 years of external quality assessment of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Zandra Deans; Francesco Fiorentino; Anil Biricik; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos; Céline Moutou; Martine De Rycke; Pamela Renwick; Sioban Sengupta; Veerle Goossens; Gary Harton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer.

Authors:  Bruce S Shapiro; Said T Daneshmand; Forest C Garner; Martha Aguirre; Cynthia Hudson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Local and systemic factors and implantation: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Chelsea Fox; Scott Morin; Jae-Wook Jeong; Richard T Scott; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Katharina Spath; Dhruti Babariya; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Andrea Borini; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Detection of mosaicism at blastocyst stage with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Joe Conaghan; Alice A Chen; Susan P Willman; Kristen Ivani; Philip E Chenette; Robert Boostanfar; Valerie L Baker; G David Adamson; Mary E Abusief; Marina Gvakharia; Kevin E Loewke; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles?

Authors:  Mae Wu Healy; George Patounakis; Matt T Connell; Kate Devine; Alan H DeCherney; Michael J Levy; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Evaluation of endometrial function: a Heraclean or Sisyphean task?

Authors:  Steven L Young
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences?

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Raymond Anchan; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.