Literature DB >> 28389805

A multicentric prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Kii® Fios® First Entry Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Marcelo Loureiro1,2,3, Mohamad Ramadan4, El Mehdi Skalli4, Pierre Blanc4, Jean Michel Fabre4,5, David Nocca4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery has evolved as an important field of surgery due to its clear benefits when compared to open laparotomy surgery. However, specific complications of laparoscopic surgery have been reported, of which the majority are complications associated with first entry to the abdominal cavity. The emergence of bariatric surgery, combined with the special considerations of the abdominal wall and cavity of obese patients, leads to seeking new modalities of access to the abdominal cavity in this specific population.Kii Fios First Entry Bladeless Trocar (Applied) is a new device that may allow surgeons to facilitate the creation of pneumoperitoneum. This prospective multicenter nonrandomized trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Kii Fios First Entry Bladeless Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
METHODS: In the period between December 2013 and June 2014, 588 patients were included by 18 surgeons from several French hospitals to undergo laparoscopic surgery using Kii Fios First Entry Trocar as a first-entry trocar. The surgeons filled out a questionnaire assessing the safety and efficacy of the trocar for every patient.
RESULTS: There were no mortality and no major complications. However, 11 cases (1.87%) of minor complications (liver and greater omentum injuries) were reported. The surgeons reported successful entry in less than 1 min for 70.58% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Kii Fios First Entry Trocar (Applied) is a safe and efficient method to establish first entry in laparoscopic bariatric surgery when all the recommendations are followed and respected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopy; Morbid obesity; Safety; Trocar

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389805     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5536-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases.

Authors:  F Zaraca; M Catarci; F Gossetti; G Mulieri; M Carboni
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Complications of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Javier F Magrina
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy.

Authors:  C M Chapron; F Pierre; S Lacroix; D Querleu; J Lansac; J B Dubuisson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Direct cannula entry for laparoscopy.

Authors:  D J Hill; P J Maher
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1996-11

5.  Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion.

Authors:  A J Audebert; V Gomel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Abdominal access in gynaecological laparoscopy: a comparison between direct optical and blind closed access by Verres needle.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Antonio Malvasi; Olav Istre; Joerg Keckstein; Michael Stark; Liselotte Mettler
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Influence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on the development of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Anuradhani Kasturiratne; Sanjaya Weerasinghe; Anuradha S Dassanayake; Shaman Rajindrajith; Arjuna P de Silva; Norihiro Kato; A Rajitha Wickremasinghe; H Janaka de Silva
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 8.  Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bram Cornette; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H H Sigman; G M Fried; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; M J Wexler; J L Meakins; J S Barkun
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-08

10.  Measurement of the force necessary for laparoscopic trocar entry.

Authors:  S L Corson; F R Batzer; B Gocial; G Maislin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  3 in total

1.  The use of optical trocars in abdominal entry among patients with obesity - A case series.

Authors:  Marwan Mohamed Bucheeri; Sujit Menon; Ashish Mhatre; Abdulmenem Yahya Abulsel
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-10

2.  Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Joseph I Ikechebelu; George U Eleje; Ngozi N Joe-Ikechebelu; Chidimma Donatus Okafor; Boniface Chukwuneme Okpala; Emmanuel O Ugwu; Cyril Emeka Nwachukwu; Chukwuemeka C Okoro; Princeston C Okam
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Optimal Initial Trocar Placement for Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.