Literature DB >> 33417065

Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.

Joseph I Ikechebelu1,2,3, George U Eleje4,5, Ngozi N Joe-Ikechebelu3,6, Chidimma Donatus Okafor2, Boniface Chukwuneme Okpala1,2,3, Emmanuel O Ugwu7,8, Cyril Emeka Nwachukwu3,9, Chukwuemeka C Okoro2, Princeston C Okam2,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the benefits and safety of direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle technique in obese women undertaking diagnostic laparoscopy procedures.
METHODS: Randomized-controlled trial on 135 obese women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy and dye test for infertility was conducted. Women were randomly assigned to either direct trocar access (n = 68) or Veress needle access (n = 67) before achieving pneumoperitoneum. The same surgeon executed the laparoscopic techniques with a single-puncture technique. The primary outcome measures included total length of the procedure and incidence of any complications, while the mean laparoscopic entry time, volume of CO2 required, and total of tries needed to attain successful entry were secondary outcomes. Intention-to-treat principle was applied to analysis.
RESULTS: Women in both groups had similar socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and none were lost to follow-up. The overall length of the procedure was significantly lesser in the direct trocar group compared to the Veress needle group (9.9 ± 6.0 vs 16.7 ± 4.7 min; p < 0.001). No significant differences occurred in other outcomes including mean entry time, volume of CO2 used, number of attempts for successful entry, and major/minor complications (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct trocar technique may be an effective alternative to Veress needle for pneumoperitoneum in obese women for diagnostic laparoscopy. It has a comparable rapid laparoscopic entry time but a significantly lower duration of the procedure and shorter exposure to anesthesia. Both methods are equally effective as there was no significant difference in the complications recorded. A greater sample trial may be essential for more corroborative substantiation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR201510000999192.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct cannulation; Dye test; Entry; Laparoscopy; Obese; Veress needle

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33417065     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05957-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  20 in total

1.  A comparison of three different entry techniques in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Roberto Angioli; Corrado Terranova; Carlo De Cicco Nardone; Ester Valentina Cafà; Patrizio Damiani; Rosalba Portuesi; Ludovico Muzii; Francesco Plotti; Marzio Angelo Zullo; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  BMI as a Predictor for Perioperative Outcome of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: a Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Yazhou He; Jiarong Wang; He Bian; Xiangbing Deng; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Comparison of Direct Trocar Entry and Veress Needle Entry in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ismail Ertugrul; Cuneyt Kayaalp; Mehmet Ali Yagci; Fatih Sumer; Servet Karagul; Kerem Tolan
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Laparoscopically guided minilaparotomy: a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of gynaecologic diseases in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Giorgia Perniola; Milena Pernice; Morena Antonilli; Chiara Achilli; Violante Di Donato; Filippo Bellati
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.

Authors:  Marco Camanni; Luca Bonino; Elena Maria Delpiano; Giuseppe Migliaretti; Paola Berchialla; Francesco Deltetto
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Risks associated with laparoscopic entry: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.

Authors:  Xavier Deffieux; Marcos Ballester; Pierre Collinet; Arnaud Fauconnier; Fabrice Pierre
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  The effect of patient body mass index on surgical difficulty in gynaecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Kate McIlwaine; Janine Manwaring; Lenore Ellett; Melissa Cameron; Emma Readman; Rocio Villegas; Peter Maher
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.100

8.  Obesity in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  K Afors; G Centini; R Murtada; J Castellano; C Meza; A Wattiez
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.237

9.  Laparoscopic entry techniques in obese patient: veress needle, direct trocar insertion or open entry technique?

Authors:  Radwan Kassir; Pierre Blanc; Patrice Lointier; Olivier Tiffet; Jean-Luc Berger; Imed Ben Amor; Jean Gugenheim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Direct trocar versus veress needle entry for laparoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mahmoud S Zakherah
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Response to Letter to Reply to the authors' response to the letter to the editor concerning the article "Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy".

Authors:  Joseph Ifeanyichukwu Ikechebelu; George Uchenna Eleje; Ngozi Nneka Joe-Ikechebelu; Chidimma Donatus Okafor; Boniface Chukwuneme Okpala; Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu; Cyril Emeka Nwachukwu; Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okoro; Princeston Chukwuemeka Okam
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Response to Letter to 'Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy'.

Authors:  Joseph Ifeanyichukwu Ikechebelu; George Uchenna Eleje; Ngozi Nneka Joe-Ikechebelu; Chidimma Donatus Okafor; Boniface Chukwuneme Okpala; Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu; Cyril Emeka Nwachukwu; Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okoro; Princeston Chukwuemeka Okam
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.493

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.