Literature DB >> 10689025

Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion.

A J Audebert1, V Gomel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of peritoneal and visceral adhesions to the umbilical region according to past surgical history and to estimate the risk of bowel injury with blind insertion of the principal trocar-cannula.
DESIGN: Prospective, unicentric study by a single operator.
SETTING: Clinique Saint-Sernin and Polyclinique de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. PATIENT(S): Eight hundred fourteen patients undergoing diagnostic or operative laparoscopy were classified into four groups based on their history of abdominal surgery: group I (n = 469), no previous abdominal surgery; group II (n = 125), prior laparoscopic surgery; group III (n = 131), previous laparotomy with a horizontal supra-pubic incision; group IV (n = 89), previous laparotomy with a midline incision. INTERVENTION(S): Initial microlaparoscopy performed through the left upper quadrant of the abdomen, inspection of the anterior abdominal wall and particularly the umbilical area for the presence of adhesions. Patients who had adhesions were assessed as to whether or not they were at significant risk of injury from blind insertion of the principal trocar. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of umbilical adhesions and the potential risk of bowel injury with blind insertion of the umbilical (principal) trocar. RESULT(S): Umbilical adhesions were found in 9.82% of the 814 cases. The rates of umbilical adhesions were as follows: group I, 0.68%; group II, 1.6%; group III, 19.8%; and group IV, 51.7%. Severe adhesions with potential risk of bowel injury with blind insertion of the umbilical trocar in the four groups were 0.42%, 0.80%, 6.87%, and 31.46%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Women with previous laparotomy have a higher incidence of umbilical adhesions, especially in case of midline incision. Preliminary inspection of the umbilical area with a microlaparoscope and insertion of the umbilical trocar under direct vision are recommended for patients at risk for adhesions to reduce complications associated with insertion of the principal (umbilical) trocar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10689025     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00555-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

Review 1.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Parvinder S Sains; Henry S Tilney; Sanjay Purkayastha; Ara W Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Alexander G Heriot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A multicentric prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Kii® Fios® First Entry Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo Loureiro; Mohamad Ramadan; El Mehdi Skalli; Pierre Blanc; Jean Michel Fabre; David Nocca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Detection of abdominal wall adhesions using visceral slide.

Authors:  Nellie Bering Zinther; Anna Zeuten; Edvard Marinovskij; Margit Haislund; Hans Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Mais
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Left upper quadrant laparoscopic placement: effects of insertion angle and body mass index on distance to posterior peritoneum by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nichole M Giannios; Vikas Gulani; Kelsey Rohlck; Rebecca L Flyckt; Stacie J Weil; William W Hurd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  [What is the value of minimizing access trauma for patients?].

Authors:  P Hildebrand; U J Roblick; R Keller; M Kleemann; L Mirow; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery.: Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Claire F la Chapelle; Willem A Bemelman; Bart M P Rademaker; Teus A van Barneveld; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-02-22

10.  Novel powdered anti-adhesion material: preventing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in a rat model.

Authors:  Katsunori Takagi; Masato Araki; Hidetoshi Fukuoka; Hiroaki Takeshita; Shigekazu Hidaka; Atsushi Nanashima; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu; Suong-Hyu Hyon; Naoki Nakajima
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.