Literature DB >> 28387616

Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Todd H Lanman1, J Kenneth Burkus2, Randall G Dryer3, Matthew F Gornet4, Jeffrey McConnell5, Scott D Hodges6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical safety and effectiveness in patients undergoing anterior cervical surgery using the Prestige LP artificial disc replacement (ADR) prosthesis to treat degenerative cervical spine disease at 2 adjacent levels compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter FDA-approved clinical trial was conducted at 30 US centers, comparing the low-profile titanium ceramic composite-based Prestige LP ADR (n = 209) at 2 levels with ACDF (n = 188). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were completed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at regular postoperative intervals to 84 months. The primary end point was overall success, a composite variable that included key safety and efficacy considerations. RESULTS At 84 months, the Prestige LP ADR demonstrated statistical superiority over fusion for overall success (observed rate 78.6% vs 62.7%; posterior probability of superiority [PPS] = 99.8%), Neck Disability Index success (87.0% vs 75.6%; PPS = 99.3%), and neurological success (91.6% vs 82.1%; PPS = 99.0%). All other study effectiveness measures were at least noninferior for ADR compared with ACDF. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of implant-related or implant/surgical procedure-related adverse events up to 84 months (26.6% and 27.7%, respectively). However, the Prestige LP group had fewer serious (Grade 3 or 4) implant- or implant/surgical procedure-related adverse events (3.2% vs 7.2%, log hazard ratio [LHR] and 95% Bayesian credible interval [95% BCI] -1.19 [-2.29 to -0.15]). Patients in the Prestige LP group also underwent statistically significantly fewer second surgical procedures at the index levels (4.2%) than the fusion group (14.7%) (LHR -1.29 [95% BCI -2.12 to -0.46]). Angular range of motion at superior- and inferior-treated levels on average was maintained in the Prestige LP ADR group to 84 months. CONCLUSIONS The low-profile artificial cervical disc in this study, Prestige LP, implanted at 2 adjacent levels, maintains improved clinical outcomes and segmental motion 84 months after surgery and is a safe and effective alternative to fusion. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00637156 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-level disc disease; ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ADR = artificial disc replacement; AE = adverse event; BCI = Bayesian credible interval; DDD = degenerative disc disease; FSU = functional spinal unit; HO = heterotopic ossification; LHR = log hazard ratio; MCS = Mental Component Summary; NDI = Neck Disability Index; PCS = Physical Component Summary; PPS = posterior probability of superiority; Prestige LP disc replacement; TDR = total disc replacement; artificial cervical disc; cervical degenerative disc disease; cervical disc arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28387616     DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  28 in total

Review 1.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Melvin C Makhni; Joseph A Osorio; Paul J Park; Joseph M Lombardi; Kiehyun Daniel Riew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  In which cases do surgeons specializing in total disc replacement perform fusion in patients with cervical spine symptoms?

Authors:  Richard D Guyer; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Scott L Blumenthal; Jack E Zigler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does neck pain as chief complaint influence the outcome of cervical total disc replacement?

Authors:  S Finkenstaedt; A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Haschtmann; F S Kleinstueck; U Mutter; H J Becker; D Bellut; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 1: Radiographic Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Rishi Wadhwa; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Application of a modified surgical position in anterior approach for total cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Wen-Xiu Hou; Hao-Xuan Zhang; Xia Wang; Hai-Ling Yang; Xiao-Rong Luan
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  [Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Yan Liang; Zhenqi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15

7.  Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

8.  Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Andrew Platt; Christopher D Witiw; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

9.  Clinical experience and two-year follow-up with a one-piece viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement.

Authors:  Kingsley Richard Chin; Jacob Ryan Lubinski; Kari Bracher Zimmers; Barry Eugene Sands; Fabio Pencle
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

10.  One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Todd H Lanman; J Kenneth Burkus; Scott D Hodges; Jeffrey R McConnell; Randall F Dryer; Francine W Schranck; Anne G Copay
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.