Literature DB >> 30983184

[Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].

Shuai Xu1, Yan Liang1, Zhenqi Zhu1, Kaifeng Wang1, Haiying Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term radiographic and clinical effectiveness of total cervical disc replacement (TDR) with Prodisc-C prosthesis at a minimum of 10 years follow-up.
METHODS: The clinical data of 118 patients with cervical disc degeneration disease (CDDD) treated with TDR by using Prodisc-C prosthesis between December 2005 and April 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 66 males and 52 females, with the age of 25-62 years (mean, 46.8 years). There were 38 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, 28 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and 52 cases of mixed cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The operative segments were C 3-7, including 90 cases of single segment, 20 cases of continuous double segments, and 8 cases of continuous three segments. A total of 154 Prodisc-C prostheses were used during the operation. The clinical effectiveness was evaluated by pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Odom grade before and after operation. Imaging evaluation indicators included range of motion (ROM), sagittal lordosis angle, intervertebral disc height (IDH), and prosthesis displacement, subsidence, loosening, locking, and heterotopic ossification (HO), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and other complications. Patients were grouped according to whether HO or ASD occurred or not, the ROM of surgical segment was compared.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up 121-150 months (mean, 135.8 months). No revision operation was performed during the follow-up period. The VAS, NDI, JOA scores and Odom grades were significantly improved at 1 week after operation and last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); VAS and NDI scores were further improved at last follow-up than those at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in JOA scores and improvement rates between at 1 week after operation and at last follow-up ( P>0.05). The ROM of the whole cervical spine and the operative segment decreased at 1 week and 10 years after operation when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the other time points ( P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the ROM between the upper adjacent segment (UAS) and the lower adjacent segment (LAS) at each time point after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in sagittal lordosis angle of cervical spine before and after operation ( P>0.05); the sagittal lordosis angle of operative segment increased significantly at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation ( P<0.05). The IDH of operative segment was significantly improved at each time point after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in IDH between UAS and LAS at each time point after operation ( P>0.05). No prosthesis displacement, subsidence, or loosening occurred at each time point after operation. There was no significant difference of the prosthetic displacement and subsidence distance between all time points after 6 months after operation ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the incidence of prosthetic locking/fusion was 10.4%, showing no significant difference when compared with 6 months (1.9%) ( P<0.05). The incidence of upper ASD and lower ASD was 1.3% and 2.6% respectively at 1 week after operation. The incidence of upper ASD and lower ASD increased gradually with time prolonging, and there were significant differences between different time points ( P<0.05). The ROM of operative segment in ASD group was lower than that in non-ASD group at each time point after operation, but there was no significant difference ( P>0.05). HO appeared in 58.4% of the segments at 6 months after operation, and the incidence of HO increased significantly with time, which was significantly different from that at 6 months after operation ( P<0.05). The ROM of operative segments in HO group was significantly lower than that in non-HO group at 6 months, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years after operation ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: TDR has little effect on adjacent segments, although there are some imaging complications, it has no significant effect on the improvement of overall clinical effectiveness. Prodisc-C prosthesis can provide long-term, safe, and definite clinical effectiveness in the treatment of CDDD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prodisc-C prosthesis; long-term effectiveness; total cervical disc replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30983184      PMCID: PMC8337169          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  45 in total

1.  Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Okechukwu A Anakwenze; Andrew H Milby; Baron S Lonner; Richard A Balderston
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A systematic review of definitions and classification systems of adjacent segment pathology.

Authors:  Paul Kraemer; Michael G Fehlings; Robin Hashimoto; Michael J Lee; Paul A Anderson; Jens R Chapman; Annie Raich; Daniel C Norvell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Clinical comparison of 2 implantation systems for single-level cervical disk replacement.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Juan Li; Hao Liu; Chen Ding; Tao Hu; Tao Li; Quan Gong
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Pierce D Nunley; Richard D Guyer; David Musante; Cameron N Carmody; Charles R Gordon; Carl Lauryssen; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Margaret O Boltes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-06-24

5.  Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Todd H Lanman; J Kenneth Burkus; Randall G Dryer; Matthew F Gornet; Jeffrey McConnell; Scott D Hodges
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Fred H Geisler; Kye M Gilder; Christopher Reah; Kelli M Howell; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement.

Authors:  Paul C McAfee; Bryan W Cunningham; John Devine; Eric Williams; Janet Yu-Yahiro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

8.  Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Petr Suchomel; Lubomír Jurák; Vladimír Benes; Radim Brabec; Ondrej Bradác; Shamel Elgawhary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Heterotopic Ossification after Cervical Arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: Time Course Radiographic Follow-up over 3 years.

Authors:  Yong-Hwan Cho; Keun-Su Kim; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-03-31

Review 10.  Durability of cervical disc arthroplasties and its influence factors: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Xiaolin Zhang; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  Unintended fusion in cervical artificial disk replacement: a prospective study on heterotopic ossification, progression, and clinical outcome, with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Catarina Marques; Anna MacDowall; Martin Skeppholm; Nuno Canto Moreira; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Percutaneous endoscopic Key-Hole technology for treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation].

Authors:  Guoping Liu; Qi Cao; Guojun Tang; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.