Literature DB >> 31970168

Application of a modified surgical position in anterior approach for total cervical artificial disc replacement.

Wen-Xiu Hou1, Hao-Xuan Zhang2, Xia Wang1, Hai-Ling Yang3, Xiao-Rong Luan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total cervical artificial disc replacement (TDR) has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with conservative methods. Positioning the surgical patient is a critical part of the procedure. Appropriate patient positioning is crucial not only for the safety of the patient but also for optimizing surgical exposure, ensuring adequate and safe anesthesia, and allowing the surgeon to operate comfortably during lengthy procedures. The surgical posture is the traditional position used in anterior cervical approach; in general, patients are in a supine position with a pad under their shoulders and a ring-shaped pillow under their head. AIM: To investigate the clinical outcomes of the use of a modified surgical position versus the traditional surgical position in anterior approach for TDR.
METHODS: In the modified position group, the patients had a soft pillow under their neck, and their jaw and both shoulders were fixed with wide tape. The analyzed data included intraoperative blood loss, position setting time, total operation time, and perioperative blood pressure and heart rate.
RESULTS: Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different before and after body positioning in both groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the traditional position group, the modified position group showed a statistically significantly longer position setting time (P < 0.05). However, the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the modified position group compared with the traditional position group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes indicated that total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were relatively lower in the modified position group than in the traditional position group, thus reducing the risks of surgery while increasing the position setting time. The modified surgical position is a safe and effective method to be used in anterior approach for TDR surgery. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior approach; Cervical spondylosis; Surgical position; Total cervical artificial disc replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 31970168      PMCID: PMC6962081          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  32 in total

1.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Ricardo Vieira Botelho
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  William F Lavelle; K Daniel Riew; Allan D Levi; Jeffrey E Florman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis of data from a total of 3160 patients across 14 randomized controlled trials with both short- and medium- to long-term outcomes.

Authors:  C Findlay; S Ayis; A K Demetriades
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning.

Authors:  I Obeid; L Boissière; C Yilgor; D Larrieu; F Pellisé; A Alanay; E Acaroglu; F J Perez-Grueso; F Kleinstück; J M Vital; A Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Kushagra Verma; Sapan D Gandhi; Mitchell Maltenfort; Todd J Albert; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kristin E Radcliff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Neil Duggal; Gwynedd E Pickett; Demytra K Mitsis; Jana L Keller
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  The impact of coronal alignment of device on radiographic degeneration in the case of total disc replacement.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Sang-Hoon Paik; Jae-Keun Oh; Yoon-Hae Kwak; Ho-Won Lee; Ki-Han You
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  The Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Jun S Kim; James Dowdell; Zoe B Cheung; Varun Arvind; Li Sun; Chanakya Jandhyala; Chierika Ukogu; William Ranson; Samantha Jacobs; Steven McAnany; Samuel Kang-Wook Cho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Clinical experience and two-year follow-up with a one-piece viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement.

Authors:  Kingsley Richard Chin; Jacob Ryan Lubinski; Kari Bracher Zimmers; Barry Eugene Sands; Fabio Pencle
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.