Literature DB >> 31970051

One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.

Matthew F Gornet1, Todd H Lanman2, J Kenneth Burkus3, Scott D Hodges4, Jeffrey R McConnell5, Randall F Dryer6, Francine W Schranck7, Anne G Copay7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) have been used to treat degenerative disc disease at single as well as multiple cervical levels. This study compares the safety and efficacy of 1-level versus 2-level CDA and ACDF.
METHODS: In total, 545 and 397 patients with degenerative disc disease were studied in 1-level and 2-level Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical trials, respectively: CDA (n = 280 and 209), ACDF (n = 265 and 188). Data from these studies were used to compare 1- versus 2-level procedures: the propensity score method was used to adjust for potential confounding effects, and adjusted mean outcome safety and efficacy scores at 2 and 7 years postsurgery were compared between 1-level and 2-level procedures within treatment type.
RESULTS: One-level and 2-level procedures had similar rates of improvement in overall success and patient-reported outcomes scores for both CDA and ACDF. There were no statistical differences in rates of implant-related adverse events (AEs) or serious implant-related AEs between 1-level and 2-level CDA. The 7-year rate of implant-related AEs was higher for 2-level than 1-level ACDF (27.7% vs 18.9%, P ≤ .036), though the rates of serious implant-related AEs between ACDF groups did not differ significantly. Secondary surgery rates were not statistically different between 1-level and 2-level procedures (CDA or ACDF) at the index or adjacent levels at 2 or 7 years. Grade IV heterotopic ossification at 7 years was reported in 4.6% of 1-level CDA patients and 8.6%/7.3% at the superior/inferior levels, respectively, of 2-level CDA patients.
CONCLUSIONS: One- and 2-level CDA appear equally safe and effective in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Two-level ACDF appears to be as effective as 1-level ACDF but with a higher rate of some AEs at long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. CLINICAL TRIALS: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00667459, NCT00642876, and NCT00637156. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA); cervical disc disease

Year:  2019        PMID: 31970051      PMCID: PMC6962002          DOI: 10.14444/6076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  45 in total

1.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Influence of the Number of Cervical Fusion Levels on Cervical Spine Motion and Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Jae Chul Lee; Ryoji Tauchi; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Domagoj Coric; Todd Albert
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-03-25

5.  Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; Pierce Dalton Nunley; Kee D Kim; Michael S Hisey; Robert J Jackson; Hyun W Bae; Gregory A Hoffman; Steven E Gaede; Guy O Danielson; Charles Gordon; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-01

6.  Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Pierce D Nunley; Richard D Guyer; David Musante; Cameron N Carmody; Charles R Gordon; Carl Lauryssen; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Margaret O Boltes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-06-24

7.  Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Seven-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; J Kenneth Burkus; Mark E Shaffrey; Hui Nian; Frank E Harrell
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06-22

8.  Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration five years after single level cervical fusion and cervical arthroplasty: a retrospective controlled study.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Yan-bin Zhao; Sheng-fa Pan; Fei-fei Zhou; Zhong-qiang Chen; Zhong-jun Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Joe Y B Lee; Fred H Geisler; Andrew Cappuccino; Christopher D Chaput; John G DeVine; Christopher Reah; Kye M Gilder; Kelli M Howell; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Matthew Robbins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  5 in total

1.  Late complication of cervical disc arthroplasty: heterotopic ossification causing myelopathy after 10 years. Illustrative case.

Authors:  Che-Han Hsu; Yi-Hsuan Kuo; Chao-Hung Kuo; Chin-Chu Ko; Jau-Ching Wu; Wen-Cheng Huang
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-08-23

2.  Impact of Depression Severity on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of anterior surgical decompression surgery for cervical degenerative disk disease: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  V N E Schuermans; A Y J M Smeets; A F M Boselie; O Zarrouk; S M M Hermans; R Droeghaag; I Curfs; S M A A Evers; H van Santbrink
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Radiological and Clinical Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with an Innovative 3D Printed Cellular Titanium Cage Filled with Vertebral Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Florian Haasters; Christoph Mehren; Frizzi Mayer; Franziska Heider
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Valérie N E Schuermans; Anouk Y J M Smeets; Toon F M Boselie; Math J J M Candel; Inez Curfs; Silvia M A A Evers; Henk Van Santbrink
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.728

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.