Literature DB >> 28384981

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots Restored with Fiber Posts Using Different Resin Cements- An In-vitro Study.

Swetha Gopal1, Sujatha Irodi2, Deepak Mehta3, Shankar Subramanya4, Vinay Kumar Govindaraju5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The influence of the remaining coronal tooth structure along with intra-radicular esthetic posts increases fracture resistance of fractured teeth especially in the anterior region. The advent of resin based luting cements improves the adhesion of fiber posts. AIM: To evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots restored with fiber posts using different resin cements - Calibra (etch and rinse), PermaFlo® DC (self-etch primer) and SmartCem2 (self-adhesive).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracted human maxillary central incisors having similar dimensions were decoronated at the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to create 16mm long specimens and endodontically treated. A total of 45 teeth were divided into three groups with 15 teeth each for cementation of easy fiber posts (size1, 0.8mm diameter). Post spaces were prepared to a depth of 10mm. Group 1 - Caulk 34% phosphoric acid gel, dual cure adhesive Prime and Bond NT followed by luting of post with Calibra cement. Group 2 - Ultra - etch then Primer A and Primer B, and PermaFlo® DC was used to cement the post. Group 3 - SmartCem2 [1:1 ratio] was used to cement the post. The excess lengths of posts were seared and teeth were mounted on acrylic blocks and loaded under compressive force to the long axis of the tooth which increased in periodic pattern of 1mm/min. The value of the force at which each root section gets fractured was noted. The data were statistically analysed using ANOVA and Tukey's Test.
RESULTS: The mean fracture load (and SD) were as follows Group 1 - 762.400 (251.490); Group 2 - 662.933 (206.709); Group 3 - 657.800 (57.372). No statistically significant differences were seen among all three Groups, p-value (0.228).
CONCLUSION: Posts cemented using self -adhesive resin cement SmartCem2 have highest fracture resistance and bonding efficacy of self-adhesive technique showed reliably better results but was comparable to total-etch and self-etch techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementation; Dental bonding; Dental cements; Dental dowel; Root canal preparation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28384981      PMCID: PMC5376846          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21167.9387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  18 in total

1.  Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement.

Authors:  Alireza Sahafi; Anne Peutzfeld; Erik Asmussen; Klaus Gotfredsen
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.

Authors:  Lu Zhi-Yue; Zhang Yu-Xing
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.

Authors:  D Sen; E Poyrazoglu; B Tuncelli
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 4.  Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations.

Authors:  J L Ferracane; J W Stansbury; F J T Burke
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Degree of conversion of dual-cure resins light-cured through glass-fiber posts.

Authors:  Francesca Cerutti; Pier Antonio Acquaviva; Massimo Gagliani; Marco Ferrari; Francesco Mangani; Laura E Depero; Antonio Cerutti
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration.

Authors:  C J Cormier; D R Burns; P Moon
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts.

Authors:  G R Goldstein; S I Hudis; D E Weintraub
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Fracture resistance of roots prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths.

Authors:  D Cecchin; A-P Farina; C-A-M Guerreiro; B Carlini-Júnior
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts.

Authors:  Paulo C A Maccari; Ewerton N Conceição; Mauro F Nunes
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.843

10.  A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Chetana S Makade; Ganesh K Meshram; Manjusha Warhadpande; Pravinkumar G Patil
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Minimal Root Canal Taper on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Bicuspids.

Authors:  Carla Zogheib; Germain Sfeir; Gianluca Plotino; Gustavo De Deus; Maha Daou; Issam Khalil
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 2.  Does Low-Taper Root Canal Shaping Decrease the Risk of Root Fracture? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Puleio; Giuseppe Lo Giudice; Angela Militi; Ugo Bellezza; Roberto Lo Giudice
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Different Post Systems.

Authors:  Mavari Karibasappa Saritha; Uttam Paul; Kiran Keswani; Ashu Jhamb; Swapnil Haribhau Mhatre; Pradyumna Kumar Sahoo
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-12-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.