Literature DB >> 28381609

Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method for Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase Production among Enterobacteriaceae.

Virginia M Pierce1, Patricia J Simner2, David R Lonsway3, Darcie E Roe-Carpenter4, J Kristie Johnson5, William B Brasso6, April M Bobenchik7, Zabrina C Lockett4, Angella Charnot-Katsikas8, Mary Jane Ferraro9, Richard B Thomson10, Stephen G Jenkins11, Brandi M Limbago3, Sanchita Das10.   

Abstract

The ability of clinical microbiology laboratories to reliably detect carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) is an important element of the effort to prevent and contain the spread of these pathogens and an integral part of antimicrobial stewardship. All existing methods have limitations. A new, straightforward, inexpensive, and specific phenotypic method for the detection of carbapenemase production, the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), was recently described. Here we describe a two-stage evaluation of a modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), in which tryptic soy broth was substituted for water during the inactivation step and the length of this incubation was extended. A validation study was performed in a single clinical laboratory to determine the accuracy of the mCIM, followed by a nine-laboratory study to verify the reproducibility of these results and define the zone size cutoff that best discriminated between CP-CRE and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae that do not produce carbapenemases. Bacterial isolates previously characterized through whole-genome sequencing or targeted PCR as to the presence or absence of carbapenemase genes were tested for carbapenemase production using the mCIM; isolates with Ambler class A, B, and D carbapenemases, non-CP-CRE isolates, and carbapenem-susceptible isolates were included. The sensitivity of the mCIM observed in the validation study was 99% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 93% to 100%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 82% to 100%). In the second stage of the study, the range of sensitivities observed across nine laboratories was 93% to 100%, with a mean of 97%; the range of specificities was 97% to 100%, with a mean of 99%. The mCIM was easy to perform and interpret for Enterobacteriaceae, with results in less than 24 h and excellent reproducibility across laboratories.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterobacteriaceae; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; bacterial antibiotic resistance; bacteriological techniques; carbapenemase; carbapenems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28381609      PMCID: PMC5527410          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00193-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

1.  Development of a novel real-time PCR assay with high-resolution melt analysis to detect and differentiate OXA-48-Like β-lactamases in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Peera Hemarajata; Shangxin Yang; Janet A Hindler; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Emerging issues in gram-negative bacterial resistance: an update for the practicing clinician.

Authors:  Shawn Vasoo; Jason N Barreto; Pritish K Tosh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Comparison of 11 Phenotypic Assays for Accurate Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Belita N A Opene; Andrew Gluck; Krizia K Chambers; Karen C Carroll; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the Modified-Hodge test, Carba NP test, and carbapenem inactivation method as screening methods for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Kageto Yamada; Machiko Kashiwa; Katsumi Arai; Noriyuki Nagano; Ryoichi Saito
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Comparing the Outcomes of Patients With Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Katherine E Goodman; Anthony D Harris; Tsigereda Tekle; Ava Roberts; Abimbola Taiwo; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Anton Y Peleg; David C Hooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  OXA-48-like carbapenemases: the phantom menace.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Anaïs Potron; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  First Report of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in a KPC-3-Expressing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Shangxin Yang; Peera Hemarajata; Kevin W Ward; Janet A Hindler; Shelley A Miller; Aric Gregson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Determining the Optimal Carbapenem MIC That Distinguishes Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Yanjie Huang; Belita N A Opene; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K F Anderson; D R Lonsway; J K Rasheed; J Biddle; B Jensen; L K McDougal; R B Carey; A Thompson; S Stocker; B Limbago; J B Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  103 in total

1.  Within-a-Day Detection and Rapid Characterization of Carbapenemase by Use of a New Carbapenem Inactivation Method-Based Test, CIMplus.

Authors:  François Caméléna; Aurélie Cointe; Vincent Mathy; Claire Hobson; Catherine Doit; Béatrice Bercot; Dominique Decré; Isabelle Podglajen; Laurent Dortet; Audrey Monjault; Philippe Bidet; Stéphane Bonacorsi; André Birgy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Biographical Feature: Stephen G. Jenkins, Ph.D., D(ABMM), F(AAM).

Authors:  Alexander J McAdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Is This the Carbapenemase Test We've Been Waiting for? A Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method.

Authors:  Susan M Butler-Wu; April N Abbott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of BD Phoenix CPO Detect for Carbapenemase Production in 190 Enterobacteriaceae Isolates.

Authors:  Chiou Horng Ong; Lasantha Ratnayake; Michelle L T Ang; Raymond Tzer Pin Lin; Douglas Su Gin Chan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms from Clinical Isolates.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  How frequently are hospitalized patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) already on contact precautions for other indications?

Authors:  Katherine E Goodman; Patricia J Simner; Eili Y Klein; Abida Q Kazmi; Avinash Gadala; Clare Rock; Pranita D Tamma; Sara E Cosgrove; Lisa L Maragakis; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Current state of the art in rapid diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Rathina Kumar Shanmugakani; Balaji Srinivasan; Marshall J Glesby; Lars F Westblade; Washington B Cárdenas; Tony Raj; David Erickson; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Diversity of resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae at a health care system in Northern California, from 2013 to 2016.

Authors:  Fiona Senchyna; Rajiv L Gaur; Johanna Sandlund; Cynthia Truong; Guillaume Tremintin; Dietmar Kültz; Carlos A Gomez; Fiona B Tamburini; Tessa Andermann; Ami Bhatt; Isabella Tickler; Nancy Watz; Indre Budvytiene; Gongyi Shi; Fred C Tenover; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 9.  NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yu Feng; Guangmin Tang; Fu Qiao; Alan McNally; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method and the Carba NP for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; J Kristie Johnson; William B Brasso; Karen Anderson; David R Lonsway; Virginia M Pierce; April M Bobenchik; Zabrina C Lockett; Angella Charnot-Katsikas; Lars F Westblade; Brian B Yoo; Stephen G Jenkins; Brandi M Limbago; Sanchita Das; Darcie E Roe-Carpenter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.