| Literature DB >> 30482638 |
Fiona Senchyna1, Rajiv L Gaur1, Johanna Sandlund1, Cynthia Truong1, Guillaume Tremintin2, Dietmar Kültz3, Carlos A Gomez4, Fiona B Tamburini5, Tessa Andermann6, Ami Bhatt5, Isabella Tickler7, Nancy Watz8, Indre Budvytiene8, Gongyi Shi2, Fred C Tenover7, Niaz Banaei9.
Abstract
The mechanism of resistance in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has therapeutic implications. We comprehensively characterized emerging mechanisms of resistance in CRE between 2013 and 2016 at a health system in Northern California. A total of 38.7% (24/62) of CRE isolates were carbapenemase gene-positive, comprising 25.0% (6/24) blaOXA-48 like, 20.8% (5/24) blaKPC, 20.8% (5/24) blaNDM, 20.8% (5/24) blaSME, 8.3% (2/24) blaIMP, and 4.2% (1/24) blaVIM. Between carbapenemases and porin loss, the resistance mechanism was identified in 95.2% (59/62) of CRE isolates. Isolates expressing blaKPC were 100% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam; blaOXA-48 like-positive isolates were 100% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam; and metallo β-lactamase-positive isolates were nearly all nonsusceptible to above antibiotics. Carbapenemase gene-negative CRE were 100% (38/38), 92.1% (35/38), 89.5% (34/38), and 31.6% (12/38) susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, respectively. None of the CRE strains were identical by whole genome sequencing. At this health system, CRE were mediated by diverse mechanisms with predictable susceptibility to newer β-lactamase inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: Avibactam; Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Carbapenemase; Porin; Relebactam; Vaborbactam
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30482638 PMCID: PMC7155946 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803