Literature DB >> 28077701

Comparison of 11 Phenotypic Assays for Accurate Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Pranita D Tamma1, Belita N A Opene2, Andrew Gluck2, Krizia K Chambers2, Karen C Carroll2, Patricia J Simner3.   

Abstract

Early identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is essential to prevent their dissemination within health care settings. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of 11 phenotypic assays for the detection of CPE. Two collections of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates were evaluated, including 191 retrospective isolates (122 CP-CRE and 69 non-CP isolates) as well as 45 prospective clinical isolates (15 CP-CRE and 30 non-CP-CRE) obtained over a 3-month period. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was determined, with molecular genotype serving as the gold standard. Among the retrospective cohort, sensitivities ranged from 72% for the boronic acid synergy test for the detection of KPC producers to ≥98% for the modified Carba NP, the Rapidec Carba NP, the manual Blue Carba, and the modified carbapenem inactivation method for the detection of any CPE. Sensitivity differed among tests across enzyme classes. All assays had excellent specificity exceeding 95%, with the exception of the boronic acid synergy test (88%) and modified Hodge test (91%). Prospectively, 45 CRE isolates were encountered over a 3-month period, including 15 CPE (33%) and 30 non-CP-CRE (67%). Results from the prospective cohort were similar. However, a decrease in specificity was observed across most tests, likely due to restricted inclusion of non-CP-CRE to assess the specificity of the assays. Overall, accuracy of CPE detection varied across phenotypic tests. Local epidemiology of CP genotypes, turnaround time, and ease of incorporation into the laboratory workflow should be considered when selecting a phenotypic assay for clinical use.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbapenem-resistant organisms; carbapenemase-producing organisms; prevalence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28077701      PMCID: PMC5377831          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02338-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods.

Authors:  Roberto Viau; Karen M Frank; Michael R Jacobs; Brigid Wilson; Keith Kaye; Curtis J Donskey; Federico Perez; Andrea Endimiani; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of a novel, rapid chromogenic biochemical assay, the Carba NP test, with the modified Hodge test for detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Shawn Vasoo; Scott A Cunningham; Peggy C Kohner; Patricia J Simner; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Karen Lolans; Mary K Hayden; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Blue-carba, an easy biochemical test for detection of diverse carbapenemase producers directly from bacterial cultures.

Authors:  J Pires; A Novais; L Peixe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of five chromogenic agar media and the Rosco Rapid Carb screen kit for detection and confirmation of carbapenemase production in Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Matthew W Gilmour; Pat DeGagne; Kim Nichol; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the Modified-Hodge test, Carba NP test, and carbapenem inactivation method as screening methods for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Kageto Yamada; Machiko Kashiwa; Katsumi Arai; Noriyuki Nagano; Ryoichi Saito
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Comparing the Outcomes of Patients With Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Katherine E Goodman; Anthony D Harris; Tsigereda Tekle; Ava Roberts; Abimbola Taiwo; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in intensive care units in Canada: results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) study, 2005-2006.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Mel DeCorby; Nancy Laing; Barb Weshnoweski; Ravi Vashisht; Franil Tailor; Kim A Nichol; Aleksandra Wierzbowski; Patricia J Baudry; James A Karlowsky; Philippe Lagacé-Wiens; Andrew Walkty; Melissa McCracken; Michael R Mulvey; Jack Johnson; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Simple disk-based method for detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-type beta-lactamase by use of a boronic acid compound.

Authors:  Yohei Doi; Brian A Potoski; Jennifer M Adams-Haduch; Hanna E Sidjabat; Anthony W Pasculle; David L Paterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  The Problem of Carbapenemase-Producing-Carbapenem-Resistant-Enterobacteriaceae Detection.

Authors:  Joseph D Lutgring; Brandi M Limbago
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Determining the Optimal Carbapenem MIC That Distinguishes Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Yanjie Huang; Belita N A Opene; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Children.

Authors:  Kathleen Chiotos; Molly Hayes; Jeffrey S Gerber; Pranita D Tamma
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.164

2.  A Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method, CIMTris, for Carbapenemase Production in Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas Species.

Authors:  Kohei Uechi; Tatsuya Tada; Kayo Shimada; Kyoko Kuwahara-Arai; Momoko Arakaki; Takaaki Tome; Isamu Nakasone; Shiro Maeda; Teruo Kirikae; Jiro Fujita
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Carbapenemase Detection among Carbapenem-Resistant Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Belita N A Opene; Krizia K Chambers; Matthew E Naumann; Karen C Carroll; Pranita D Tamma
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Is This the Carbapenemase Test We've Been Waiting for? A Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method.

Authors:  Susan M Butler-Wu; April N Abbott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparative evaluation of in-house Carba NP test with other phenotypic tests for rapid detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Raunak Bir; Sarita Mohapatra; Amarjeet Kumar; Sonu Tyagi; Seema Sood; Bimal Ku Das; Arti Kapil
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 6.  Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms from Clinical Isolates.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid detection of antimicrobial resistance markers with Allplex™ Entero-DR assay directly from positive blood culture bottles.

Authors:  Paavo Hannus; Kati Räisänen; Jari J Martelin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yu Feng; Guangmin Tang; Fu Qiao; Alan McNally; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method and the Carba NP for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; J Kristie Johnson; William B Brasso; Karen Anderson; David R Lonsway; Virginia M Pierce; April M Bobenchik; Zabrina C Lockett; Angella Charnot-Katsikas; Lars F Westblade; Brian B Yoo; Stephen G Jenkins; Brandi M Limbago; Sanchita Das; Darcie E Roe-Carpenter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Emerging Microtechnologies and Automated Systems for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Yiyan Li; Xing Yang; Weian Zhao
Journal:  SLAS Technol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.