Hubert W Vesper1, Samuel P Caudill2, Heather C Kuiper2, Quanhe Yang3, Namanjeet Ahluwalia4, David A Lacher4, James L Pirkle2. 1. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, hvesper@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health. 3. Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, and. 4. Division of Health Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
Background: The consumption of trans fatty acids (TFAs) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and reducing their consumption is a major public health objective. Food intake studies have provided estimates for TFA concentrations in the US population; however, there is a need for data on TFA blood concentrations in the population.Objective: The objective of this study was to determine plasma TFA concentrations in a nationally representative group of fasted adults in the US population in NHANES samples from 1999-2000 and 2009-2010.Design: Four major TFAs [palmitelaidic acid (C16:1n-7t), trans vaccenic acid (C18:1n-7t), elaidic acid (C18:1n-9t), and linoelaidic acid (C18:2n-6t,9t)] were measured in plasma in 1613 subjects from NHANES 1999-2000 and 2462 subjects from NHANES 2009-2010 by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Geometric means and distribution percentiles were calculated for each TFA and their sum by age, sex, and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American), and covariate-adjusted geometric means were computed by using a model that included these demographic and other dietary factors, as well as survey year and any significant interaction terms. Results: These nationally representative data for the adult US population show that TFA concentrations were 54% lower in NHANES 2009-2010 than in NHANES 1999-2000. Covariate-adjusted geometric means for the sum of the 4 TFAs were 81.4 μmol/L (95% CI: 77.3, 85.6 μmol/L) and 37.8 μmol/L (95% CI: 36.4, 39.4 μmol/L) in NHANES 1999-2000 and 2009-2010, respectively. Even with the large decline in TFA concentrations, differences between demographic subgroups were comparable in the 2 surveys. Conclusion: The results indicate an overall reduction in TFA concentrations in the US population and provide a valuable baseline to evaluate the impact of the recent regulation categorizing TFAs as food additives.
Background: The consumption of trans fatty acids (TFAs) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and reducing their consumption is a major public health objective. Food intake studies have provided estimates for TFA concentrations in the US population; however, there is a need for data on TFA blood concentrations in the population.Objective: The objective of this study was to determine plasma TFA concentrations in a nationally representative group of fasted adults in the US population in NHANES samples from 1999-2000 and 2009-2010.Design: Four major TFAs [palmitelaidic acid (C16:1n-7t), trans vaccenic acid (C18:1n-7t), elaidic acid (C18:1n-9t), and linoelaidic acid (C18:2n-6t,9t)] were measured in plasma in 1613 subjects from NHANES 1999-2000 and 2462 subjects from NHANES 2009-2010 by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Geometric means and distribution percentiles were calculated for each TFA and their sum by age, sex, and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American), and covariate-adjusted geometric means were computed by using a model that included these demographic and other dietary factors, as well as survey year and any significant interaction terms. Results: These nationally representative data for the adult US population show that TFA concentrations were 54% lower in NHANES 2009-2010 than in NHANES 1999-2000. Covariate-adjusted geometric means for the sum of the 4 TFAs were 81.4 μmol/L (95% CI: 77.3, 85.6 μmol/L) and 37.8 μmol/L (95% CI: 36.4, 39.4 μmol/L) in NHANES 1999-2000 and 2009-2010, respectively. Even with the large decline in TFA concentrations, differences between demographic subgroups were comparable in the 2 surveys. Conclusion: The results indicate an overall reduction in TFA concentrations in the US population and provide a valuable baseline to evaluate the impact of the recent regulation categorizing TFAs as food additives.
Authors: Alice H Lichtenstein; Lawrence J Appel; Michael Brands; Mercedes Carnethon; Stephen Daniels; Harold A Franch; Barry Franklin; Penny Kris-Etherton; William S Harris; Barbara Howard; Njeri Karanja; Michael Lefevre; Lawrence Rudel; Frank Sacks; Linda Van Horn; Mary Winston; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-06-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sunni L Mumford; Richard W Browne; Keewan Kim; Christina Nichols; Brian Wilcox; Robert M Silver; Matthew T Connell; Tiffany L Holland; Daniel L Kuhr; Ukpebo R Omosigho; Neil J Perkins; Rose Radin; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Melecia Wright; Wendy McKelvey; Christine Johnson Curtis; Lorna E Thorpe; Hubert W Vesper; Heather C Kuiper; Sonia Y Angell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Heather C Kuiper; Na Wei; Samantha L McGunigale; Hubert W Vesper Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Manja Koch; Jeremy D Furtado; Steven T DeKosky; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller; Kenneth J Mukamal; Majken K Jensen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 8.472
Authors: Shauna M Downs; Milan Z Bloem; Miaobing Zheng; Elise Catterall; Beth Thomas; Lennert Veerman; Jason Hy Wu Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2017-11-13