Justin P Zachariah1, Teniola Shittu2, Yunfei Wang2. 1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX. Electronic address: justin.zachariah@bcm.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.
Abstract
Atherosclerosis begins in youth, partly driven by excess weight (EW) and abnormal lipids. Despite pediatric obesity worsening, lipids improved. Given the relation between EW and abnormal lipids, changes in normal-weight (NW) youth may be relevant. We examined the proportions and temporal trends of youth with abnormal lipids who were NW versus EW. METHODS: Analysis was done from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1988-2016. Data were extracted for 10- to 20-year-olds measured with anthropometrics and laboratory testing to determine proportions of NW versus EW with total cholesterol >190 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <40 mg/dL, and calculated non-HDL-C >145 mg/dL (N = 14,785). In survey-weighted regression analysis, a weight-status interaction term was used to examine effect modification in the lipid temporal trend. RESULTS: Over time, EW prevalence increased, whereas dyslipidemia decreased (trend P value < .001 for both). For the pooled sample, EW more than doubled the risk of each lipid disorder (P < .0001 for each). However, for each abnormal lipid, 26%-63% were NW. As the temporal trend in abnormal lipids declined, the proportion with abnormal lipids who were NW also declined. On regression analysis, temporal declines in NW and EW differed for HDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: NW constituted more than a quarter to half of youth with abnormal lipids. Over time, youth with abnormal lipids were less often NW. The novel observation that a high proportion of youth with abnormal lipids are NW is relevant to debates on universal lipid screening, the focus on weight reduction in youth lipid management, and conventional wisdom in cardiometabolic health.
Atherosclerosis begins in youth, partly driven by excess weight (EW) and abnormal lipids. Despite pediatric obesity worsening, lipids improved. Given the relation between EW and abnormal lipids, changes in normal-weight (NW) youth may be relevant. We examined the proportions and temporal trends of youth with abnormal lipids who were NW versus EW. METHODS: Analysis was done from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1988-2016. Data were extracted for 10- to 20-year-olds measured with anthropometrics and laboratory testing to determine proportions of NW versus EW with total cholesterol >190 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <40 mg/dL, and calculated non-HDL-C >145 mg/dL (N = 14,785). In survey-weighted regression analysis, a weight-status interaction term was used to examine effect modification in the lipid temporal trend. RESULTS: Over time, EW prevalence increased, whereas dyslipidemia decreased (trend P value < .001 for both). For the pooled sample, EW more than doubled the risk of each lipid disorder (P < .0001 for each). However, for each abnormal lipid, 26%-63% were NW. As the temporal trend in abnormal lipids declined, the proportion with abnormal lipids who were NW also declined. On regression analysis, temporal declines in NW and EW differed for HDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: NW constituted more than a quarter to half of youth with abnormal lipids. Over time, youth with abnormal lipids were less often NW. The novel observation that a high proportion of youth with abnormal lipids are NW is relevant to debates on universal lipid screening, the focus on weight reduction in youth lipid management, and conventional wisdom in cardiometabolic health.
Authors: Costan G Magnussen; Juha Koskinen; Markus Juonala; Wei Chen; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Matthew A Sabin; Russell Thomson; Michael D Schmidt; Quoc Manh Nguyen; Ji-Hua Xu; Michael R Skilton; Mika Kähönen; Tomi Laitinen; Leena Taittonen; Terho Lehtimäki; Tapani Rönnemaa; Jorma S A Viikari; Gerald S Berenson; Olli T Raitakari Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Brian A Ference; Wonsuk Yoo; Issa Alesh; Nitin Mahajan; Karolina K Mirowska; Abhishek Mewada; Joel Kahn; Luis Afonso; Kim Allan Williams; John M Flack Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Amanda M Perak; Hongyan Ning; Brian K Kit; Sarah D de Ferranti; Linda V Van Horn; John T Wilkins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hubert W Vesper; Samuel P Caudill; Heather C Kuiper; Quanhe Yang; Namanjeet Ahluwalia; David A Lacher; James L Pirkle Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Nadeem Sarwar; Philip Perry; Stephen Kaptoge; Kausik K Ray; Alexander Thompson; Angela M Wood; Sarah Lewington; Naveed Sattar; Chris J Packard; Rory Collins; Simon G Thompson; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Markus Juonala; Jorma S A Viikari; Mika Kähönen; Tiina Solakivi; Hans Helenius; Antti Jula; Jukka Marniemi; Leena Taittonen; Tomi Laitinen; Tapio Nikkari; Olli T Raitakari Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mariel M Finucane; Gretchen A Stevens; Melanie J Cowan; Goodarz Danaei; John K Lin; Christopher J Paciorek; Gitanjali M Singh; Hialy R Gutierrez; Yuan Lu; Adil N Bahalim; Farshad Farzadfar; Leanne M Riley; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Albert Wiegman; Samuel S Gidding; Gerald F Watts; M John Chapman; Henry N Ginsberg; Marina Cuchel; Leiv Ose; Maurizio Averna; Catherine Boileau; Jan Borén; Eric Bruckert; Alberico L Catapano; Joep C Defesche; Olivier S Descamps; Robert A Hegele; G Kees Hovingh; Steve E Humphries; Petri T Kovanen; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Luis Masana; Børge G Nordestgaard; Päivi Pajukanta; Klaus G Parhofer; Frederick J Raal; Kausik K Ray; Raul D Santos; Anton F H Stalenhoef; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Erik S Stroes; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Olov Wiklund Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 29.983