Literature DB >> 28377855

ISASS Recommendations/Coverage Criteria for Decompression with Interlaminar Stabilization - Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.

Richard Guyer1, Michael Musacchio2, Frank P Cammisa3, Morgan P Lorio4.   

Abstract

Keywords:  decompression; interlaminar stabilization (ils); lumbar spinal stenosis (lss)

Year:  2016        PMID： 28377855      PMCID： PMC5374995          DOI： 10.14444/3041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN： 2211-4599


× No keyword cloud information.
  37 in total

1.  Mitigating adverse event reporting bias in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Kevin B McGowan; Marci Halevi; Michael C Gerling; Alok D Sharan; Peter G Whang; Greg Maislin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Chen; Li Guan; Yu-Zeng Liu; Jin-Cai Yang; Wen-Long Wang; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Urvij Modhia; Steven Takemoto; Mary Jo Braid-Forbes; Michael Weber; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population.

Authors:  R A Deyo; M A Ciol; D C Cherkin; J D Loeser; S J Bigos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Giuseppe Olindo; Leonardo Corbino; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery.

Authors:  Frank S Kleinstück; Dieter Grob; Friederike Lattig; Viktor Bartanusz; Francois Porchet; Dezsö Jeszenszky; David O'Riordan; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Stress fracture of bilateral posterior facet after insertion of interspinous implant.

Authors:  Kook Jin Chung; Yoon Sub Hwang; Sung Hye Koh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.

Authors:  Reginald Davis; Joshua D Auerbach; Hyun Bae; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-05-31
View more
  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reporting in Routine Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe LewandrowskI; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

2.  Artificial Intelligence Comparison of the Radiologist Report With Endoscopic Predictors of Successful Transforaminal Decompression for Painful Conditions of the Lumber Spine: Application of Deep Learning Algorithm Interpretation of Routine Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 3.  Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Jay S Grider; Jason E Pope; Tim J Lamer; Sayed E Wahezi; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Steven Falowski; Reda Tolba; Jay M Shah; Natalie Strand; Alex Escobar; Mark Malinowski; Anjum Bux; Navdeep Jassal; Jennifer Hah; Jacqueline Weisbein; Nestor D Tomycz; Jessica Jameson; Erika A Petersen; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  Reliability Analysis of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reporting of Routine Lumbar MRI Scans.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  The 2-Level Experience of Interlaminar Stabilization: 5-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Experience Compared to Fusion for the Sustainable Management of Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Rachel B Simon; Christina Dowe; Samuel Grinberg; Frank P Cammisa; Celeste Abjornson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.