| Literature DB >> 28376835 |
Amarnath Singh1,2, Chandrasekharan Nair Kesavachandran3, Ritul Kamal1, Vipin Bihari1, Afzal Ansari1, Parappurath Abdul Azeez4, Prem Narain Saxena5, Anil Kumar Ks6, Altaf Hussain Khan7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study is an attempt to explore the association between kitchen indoor air pollutants and physiological profiles in kitchen workers with microalbuminuria (MAU) in north India (Lucknow) and south India (Coimbatore).Entities:
Keywords: Blood pressure; Indoor air; Kitchen workers; Lung function; Microalbuminuria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28376835 PMCID: PMC5379539 DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0243-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Demographic Characteristics, personal habits, physiological profiles of study subject
| Parameters | Control | Kitchen workers (North India) | Kitchen workers (South India) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non MAU | MAU | Non MAU | MAU | Non MAU | MAU | |
| Age, Mean ± SD (Range) | 31.51 ± 9.50 | 37.0 ± 12.30 | 27.82 ± 7.62 | 29.65 ± 9.45*** | 27.94 ± 10.58 | 30.78 ± 11.38** |
| Height (cm) Mean ± SD (Range) | 166.34 ± 6.97 | 165.24 ± 7.23 | 167.82 ± 7.24 | 166.14 ± 6.83 | 164.52 ± 6.02 | 167.06 ± 7.23 |
| Weight (Kg) Mean ± SD (Range) | 64.83 ± 12.72 | 63.09 ± 16.96 | 63.16 ± 12.66 | 63.68 ± 11.08 | 61.48 ± 11.96 | 63.88 ± 14.15 |
| Body Mass Index (Kg/m2) Mean ± SD (Range) | 23.33 ± 3.98 | 22.95 ± 5.12 | 22.36 ± 3.93 | 23.06 ± 3.45 | 22.65 ± 4.32 | 22.83 ± 4.86 |
| Smoking history n (%) | 15 (14.02) | 6 (15.78) | 18 (17.82) | 32 (24.24) | 24 (22.86) | 10 (12.82) |
| Alcohol consumption n (%) | 24 (22.43) | 14 (36.84) | 17 (16.83) | 18 (13.64) | 57 (52.78) | 37 (47.44) |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) Mean ± SD (Range) | 123.35 ± 12.24 | 120.64 ± 10.81 | 123.43 ± 13.71 | 125.61 ± 12.49* | 124.92 ± 14.96 | 125.69 ± 14.42* |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) Mean ± SD (Range) | 81.87 ± 10.85 | 81.18 ± 8.72 | 83.01 ± 10.35 | 84.88 ± 10.45* | 81.46 ± 10.79 | 83.95 ± 10.96 |
| Pulse (beats/min) | 82.78 ± 10.85 | 84.03 ± 13.67 | 85.07 ± 11.47 | 85.17 ± 13.88 | 82.95 ± 12.68 | 82.40 ± 15.45 |
| Blood glucose (mg/dL) Mean ± SD (Range) | 120.33 ± 60.57 | 122.33 ± 59.12 | 114.83 ± 22.49 | 120.35 ± 45.96 | 117.78 ± 35.52 | 134.91 ± 80.94 |
All comparisons have been done among the MAU subjects in the three groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Alteration in Pulmonary function values with respect to microalbuminuria (MAU)
| Parameters | Control | Kitchen workers (North India) | Kitchen workers (South India) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non MAU | MAU | Non MAU | MAU | Non MAU | MAU | |
| FEV1 (L/s) Mean ± SD (Range) | 2.25 ± 0.56 | 2.01 ± 0.63 | 1.95 ± 0.57 | 1.74 ± 0.56* | 1.60 ± 0.49 | 1.30 ± 0.49*** |
| FEV6 (L/s) Mean ± SD (Range) | 2.49 ± 0.61 | 2.32 ± 0.66 | 2.24 ± 0.56 | 2.06 ± 0.51* | 1.98 ± 0.53 | 1.78 ± 0.63* |
| PEFR (L/min) Mean ± SD (Range) | 435.06 ± 99.97 | 328.31 ± 97.83 | 415.27 ± 111.04 | 382.71 ± 135.66* | 303.18 ± 90.39 | 296.68 ± 102.29*** |
| % predicted FEV1% Mean ± SD (Range) | 76.94 ± 17.28 | 70.41 ± 19.74 | 68.95 ± 19.51 | 63.03 ± 18.20* | 57.40 ± 18.06 | 45.60 ± 17.19*** |
| % predicted FEV6% Mean ± SD (Range) | 68.86 ± 15.67 | 64.28 ± 17.48 | 62.24 ± 16.91 | 57.56 ± 14.01* | 57.23 ± 15.51 | 50.40 ± 17.04* |
| Obstruction (FEV1/FEV6) n (%) | 15 (14.02) | 5 (13.16) | 4 (3.96) | 13 (9.85) | 26 (24.07) | 30 (38.46)** |
| Restriction n (%) | 77 (71.96) | 29 (76.32) | 47 (46.53) | 81 (61.36) | 86 (79.63) | 68 (87.18) |
All comparisons have been done among the MAU subjects in the three groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Odds ratio (95% CI) for microalbuminuria with respect to pulmonary function in MAU subjects
| Pulmonary function pattern | Control | Kitchen workers (North India) | Kitchen workers (South India) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Obstruction (FEV1/FEV6) | 0.91 (0.39 – 2.08) | 1.46 (0.58 – 3.66) | 1.59 (0.98 – 2.57) |
| Restriction | 1.39 (0.79 – 2.48) | 1.57 (1.06 – 2.32) | 1.63 (1.11 – 2.40) |
Models adjusted for age, blood pressure (normal/hypertensive), obesity (using body mass index), smoking history, heavy alcohol drinking
Indoor air pollutants in kitchen
| Parameter | Control location (Non kitchen areas) | North Indian Kitchen | South Indian Kitchen |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) Mean (Range) | 34.67 (14 – 57) | 68.18 (1–293) *** | 78.55 (10 – 429) *** |
| PM1 (μg/m3) Mean (Range) | 26.75 (10 – 48) | 59.46 (1–187) *** | 61.52 (8 – 409) *** |
| TVOC (ppb) Mean (Range) | 319.27 (209 – 534) | 961.81 (772 – 3124) *** | 399.39 (224 – 525) |
| CO (ppm) Mean (Range) | 0.62 (0.6 – 0.7) | 6.54 (0.1 – 35.3) *** | 11.39 (0.1 – 19.5) *** |
| CO2 (ppm) Mean (Range) | 621.3 (611 – 627) | 941.66 (579 – 1582) ** | 661.06 (432 – 1087) |
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Fig. 1Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of different shape and size of particulate matter in kitchen indoor air. Scanning electron micrograph of different location kitchen indoor air sample: (1) North Indian Kitchen (a,b) (2) South Indian Kitchen (c,d)
Fig. 2SEM-EDX analysis of kitchen indoor air sample from North India and South India
Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy analysis of kitchen indoor air samples
| Functional class | Functional group | Normal range (cm−1) | North Indian Kitchen (Spectra detected cm−1) | South Indian Kitchen (Spectra detected cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkane | C-H strech | 2950-2850 | 2925.58,2930.41 | 2925.99,2950,2930.36 |
| Alkene | C-H strech | 3100-3010 | 3020.05 | 3019.08,3021.27 |
| C = C Strech | 1680-1620 | ND | 1634.08 | |
| Alkyne | C = C Strech | 2260-2100 | ND | 2126.09, |
| Aromatic | C = C strech | 1400-1600 | 1543.71, 1584.35 | ND |
| Alcohol/Phenol | C-O strech | 1150-1050 | 1068.65,1065.29,1068.25 | 1068.16,1080.18,1111.17 |
| O-H strech | 3550-3200 | 3399.78,3402.43,3399.79 | 3399.88,3417.45,3393.67,3400.75,3397.31 | |
| Carboxylic Acid | O-H strech | 3000-2500 | ND | 2520.54,2839.84 |
| Amine | C-N strech | 1080-1360 | 1215.3,1154.96,1266.83 | 1154.88,1215.71,1216.02,1218.74 |
| Amide | C = O strech | 1690-1630 | 1638.74 | 1638.84,1634.08,1644.48,1644.08 |
Fig. 3Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy analysis of kitchen indoor air samples. FTIR spectra of different location kitchen indoor air sample :(1) North Indian kitchen (a,b) (2) South Indian Kitchen (c,d)