Literature DB >> 22486983

PM2.5 and ultrafine particles emitted during heating of commercial cooking oils.

M A Torkmahalleh1, I Goldasteh, Y Zhao, N M Udochu, A Rossner, P K Hopke, A R Ferro.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Seven commercial cooking oils were investigated to determine the PM(2.5) mass and ultrafine particle (UFP) emission rates and emission fluxes (rates per area). The results of this study showed that at 197°C soybean, safflower, canola, and peanut oils produced lower PM(2.5) emission fluxes (6.1 × 10(5), 3.0 × 10(5), 5.4 × 10(5), and 3.9 × 10(5) μg/min/m(2), respectively) than corn, coconut, and olive oils (2.7 × 10(6), 2.9 × 10(6), and 5.7 × 10(6) μg/min/m(2), respectively). Similarly, the total particle number flux at 197°C was lower for soybean, safflower, and canola oils (3.5 × 10(13), 8.6 × 10(13), and 1.0 × 10(14) #/min/m(2), respectively) than the corn, coconut, olive, and peanut oils (2.4 × 10(14), 1.4 × 10(14), 1.7 × 10(14), and 3.8 × 10(14) #/min/m(2), respectively). In general, oils with a higher smoke temperature resulted in lower particle concentrations over the measured temperature range (131-197°C). The percentage of UFP (particle diameter D(p) 10-100 nm) to total particles (D(p) 10-500 nm) ranged from 76 to 99% for this temperature range. Particles below 10 nm in diameter were not measured. The particle number size distribution showed a polydisperse behavior with major mode sizes ranging from 25 nm (for peanut oil) to 82 nm (for soybean oil) at an oil temperature of 197°C. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study presents particle number and mass concentrations, size distributions, emission rates, and emission fluxes from heating common cooking oils. The emission rates and emission fluxes can be used as inputs to models for indirect exposure analysis studies. The study may also be used to provide guidance on choosing oils that result in lower emission rates when heated.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22486983     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00783.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  8 in total

1.  Quantifying trace elements in the emitted particulate matter during cooking and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Soudabeh Gorjinezhad; Aiymgul Kerimray; Mehdi Amouei Torkmahalleh; Melek Keleş; Fatma Ozturk; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Combining sensor-based measurement and modeling of PM2.5 and black carbon in assessing exposure to indoor aerosols.

Authors:  Jennie Cox; Seung-Hyun Cho; Patrick Ryan; Kelechi Isiugo; James Ross; Steven Chillrud; Zheng Zhu; Roman Jandarov; Sergey A Grinshpun; Tiina Reponen
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Indoor air pollution and its association with poor lung function, microalbuminuria and variations in blood pressure among kitchen workers in India: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amarnath Singh; Chandrasekharan Nair Kesavachandran; Ritul Kamal; Vipin Bihari; Afzal Ansari; Parappurath Abdul Azeez; Prem Narain Saxena; Anil Kumar Ks; Altaf Hussain Khan
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 4.  Role of indoor aerosols for COVID-19 viral transmission: a review.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Puqi Jia; Jie Han
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 9.027

Review 5.  Environmental contributions to the interactions of COVID-19 and asthma: A secondary publication and update.

Authors:  Marilyn Urrutia-Pereira; Herberto Jose Chong-Neto; Isabella Annesi Maesano; Ignacio J Ansotegui; Luis Caraballo; Lorenzo Cecchi; Carmen Galán; Juan Felipe López; Margarita Murrieta Aguttes; David Peden; Anna Pomés; Josefina Zakzuk; Nelson A Rosário Filho; Gennaro D'Amato
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.516

6.  Highway proximity associated with cardiovascular disease risk: the influence of individual-level confounders and exposure misclassification.

Authors:  Doug Brugge; Kevin Lane; Luz T Padró-Martínez; Andrea Stewart; Kyle Hoesterey; David Weiss; Ding Ding Wang; Jonathan I Levy; Allison P Patton; Wig Zamore; Mkaya Mwamburi
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Characteristics and risk assessment of occupational exposure to ultrafine particles generated from cooking in the Chinese restaurant.

Authors:  Xiangjing Gao; Meibian Zhang; Hua Zou; Zanrong Zhou; Weiming Yuan; Changjian Quan; Yiyao Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessing Impacts of Additives on Particulate Matter and Volatile Organic Compounds Produced from the Grilling of Meat.

Authors:  Xingyun Liu; Wei Xing; Zhaoyang Xu; Xiaomin Zhang; Hui Zhou; Kezhou Cai; Baocai Xu; Conggui Chen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.