Literature DB >> 15116834

Source strengths of ultrafine and fine particles due to cooking with a gas stove.

Lance A Wallace1, Steven J Emmerich, Cynthia Howard-Reed.   

Abstract

Cooking, particularly frying, is an important source of particles indoors. Few studies have measured a full range of particle sizes, including ultrafine particles, produced during cooking. In this study, semicontinuous instruments with fine size discriminating ability were used to calculate particle counts in 124 size bins from 0.01 to 2.5 microm. Data were collected at 5 min intervals for 18 months in an occupied house. Tracer gas measurements were made every 10 min in each of 10 rooms of the house to establish air change rates. Cooking episodes (N = 44) were selected meeting certain criteria (high concentrations, no concurrent indoor sources, long smooth decay curves), and the number and volume of particles produced were determined for each size category. For each episode, the particle decay rate was determined and used to determine the source strength for each size category. The selected cooking episodes (mostly frying) were capable of producing about 10(14) particles over the length of the cooking period (about 15 min), more than 90% of them in the ultrafine (< 0.1 microm) range, with an estimated whole-house volume concentration of 50 (microm/cm)3. More than 60% of this volume occurred in the 0.1-0.3 microm range. Frying produced peak numbers of particles at about 0.06 microm, with a secondary peak at 0.01 microm. The peak volume occurred at a diameter of about 0.16 microm. Since the cooking episodes selected were biased toward higher concentrations, the particle concentrations measured during about 600 h of morning and evening cooking over a full year were compared to concentrations measured during noncooking periods at the same times. Cooking was capable of producing more than 10 times the ultrafine particle number observed during noncooking periods. Levels of PM2.5 were increased during cooking by a factor of 3. Breakfast cooking (mainly heating water for coffee and using an electric toaster) produced concentrations about half those produced from more complex dinnertime cooking. Although the number and volume concentrations observed depend on air change rates, house volume, and deposition rates due to fans and filters, the source strengths calculated here are independent of these variables and may be used to estimate number and volume concentrations in other types of homes with widely varying volumes, ventilation rates, and heating and air-conditioning practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116834     DOI: 10.1021/es0306260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  22 in total

Review 1.  Immunotoxicological impact of occupational and environmental nanoparticles exposure: The influence of physical, chemical, and combined characteristics of the particles.

Authors:  Paola Pedata; Claudia Petrarca; Elpidio Maria Garzillo; Mario Di Gioacchino
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.219

2.  The lasting effect of limonene-induced particle formation on air quality in a genuine indoor environment.

Authors:  Carolin Rösch; Dirk K Wissenbach; Martin von Bergen; Ulrich Franck; Manfred Wendisch; Uwe Schlink
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Comparative analysis of ventilation efficiency on ultrafine particle removal in university MakerSpaces.

Authors:  Lynn E Secondo; Hayat I Adawi; John Cuddehe; Kenneth Hopson; Allison Schumacher; Larry Mendoza; Charles Cartin; Nastassja A Lewinski
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Microfluidic paper-based analytical device for aerosol oxidative activity.

Authors:  Yupaporn Sameenoi; Pantila Panymeesamer; Natcha Supalakorn; Kirsten Koehler; Orawon Chailapakul; Charles S Henry; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Measurement of ultrafine particles and other air pollutants emitted by cooking activities.

Authors:  Qunfang Zhang; Roja H Gangupomu; David Ramirez; Yifang Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Energy consumption of using HEPA-based portable air cleaner in residences: A monitoring study in Seattle, US.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Ching-Hsuan Huang; Elena Austin; Jeff Shirai; Yisi Liu; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Energy Build       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.879

7.  Real-time indoor PM2.5 monitoring in an urban cohort: Implications for exposure disparities and source control.

Authors:  MyDzung T Chu; Sara E Gillooly; Jonathan I Levy; Jose Vallarino; Lacy N Reyna; Jose Guillermo Cedeño Laurent; Brent A Coull; Gary Adamkiewicz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Jiayuan Hao; Elena Austin; Jeff Shirai; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 7.093

9.  The contribution of cooking appliances and residential traffic proximity to aerosol personal exposure.

Authors:  M Shehab; F D Pope; J M Delgado-Saborit
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-01-22

10.  Inflammatory markers in blood and exhaled air after short-term exposure to cooking fumes.

Authors:  Sindre Rabben Svedahl; Kristin Svendsen; Ellen Tufvesson; Pål R Romundstad; Ann Kristin Sjaastad; Torgunn Qvenild; Bjørn Hilt
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.