Chul-Hyun Park1, Yong-Taek Lee1, Youbin Yi1, Jung-Sang Lee1, Jung Ho Park2, Kyung Jae Yoon1. 1. Department of Physical &Rehabilitation Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM) offered an improved method to objectively analyze the status of pharynx and esophagus. At present, HRM for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia has been poorly studied. We aimed to determine feeding method and predict the development of aspiration pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia using HRM. METHODS: We recruited 120 patients with dysphagia who underwent both HRM and videofluoroscopic swallow study. HRM was used to estimate pressure events from velopharynx (VP) to upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Feeding methods were determined to non-oral or oral feeding according to dysphagia severity. We prospectively followed patients to assess the development of aspiration pneumonia. RESULTS: VP maximal pressure and UES relaxation duration were independently associated with non-oral feeding. Non-oral feeding was determined based on optimal cutoff value of 105.0 mm Hg for VP maximal pressure (95.0% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity) and 0.45 s for UES relaxation duration (76.3% sensitivity and 57.5% specificity), respectively. During a mean follow-up of 18.8 months, 15.8% of patients developed aspiration pneumonia. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, VP maximal pressure (P<0.01) and UES relaxation duration (P<0.05) independently predicted the development of aspiration pneumonia. Cumulative incidence of aspiration pneumonia was significantly increased in patients with readings below optimal cutoff values for VP maximal pressure (P<0.01) and UES relaxation duration (P<0.01), individually. CONCLUSIONS: We first established the optimal thresholds for HRM parameters to determine feeding method and predict the development of aspiration pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
OBJECTIVES: The introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM) offered an improved method to objectively analyze the status of pharynx and esophagus. At present, HRM for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia has been poorly studied. We aimed to determine feeding method and predict the development of aspiration pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia using HRM. METHODS: We recruited 120 patients with dysphagia who underwent both HRM and videofluoroscopic swallow study. HRM was used to estimate pressure events from velopharynx (VP) to upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Feeding methods were determined to non-oral or oral feeding according to dysphagia severity. We prospectively followed patients to assess the development of aspiration pneumonia. RESULTS: VP maximal pressure and UES relaxation duration were independently associated with non-oral feeding. Non-oral feeding was determined based on optimal cutoff value of 105.0 mm Hg for VP maximal pressure (95.0% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity) and 0.45 s for UES relaxation duration (76.3% sensitivity and 57.5% specificity), respectively. During a mean follow-up of 18.8 months, 15.8% of patients developed aspiration pneumonia. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, VP maximal pressure (P<0.01) and UES relaxation duration (P<0.05) independently predicted the development of aspiration pneumonia. Cumulative incidence of aspiration pneumonia was significantly increased in patients with readings below optimal cutoff values for VP maximal pressure (P<0.01) and UES relaxation duration (P<0.01), individually. CONCLUSIONS: We first established the optimal thresholds for HRM parameters to determine feeding method and predict the development of aspiration pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.