PURPOSE: To validate electromagnetic and thermal simulations with in vivo temperature measurements, and to demonstrate a framework that can be used to predict temperature increase caused by radiofrequency (RF) excitation with dipole transmitter arrays. METHODS: Dipole arrays were used to deliver RF energy in the back/neck region of the swine using different RF excitation patterns (n = 2-4 per swine) for heating. The temperature in anesthetized swine (n = 3) was measured using fluoroscopic probes (n = 12) and compared against thermal modeling from animal-specific electromagnetic simulations. RESULTS: Simulated temperature curves were in agreement with the measured data. The root mean square error between simulated and measured temperature rise at all locations (at the end of each RF excitation) is calculated as 0.37°C. The mean experimental temperature rise at the maximum temperature rise locations (averaged over all experiments) is calculated as 2.89°C. The root mean square error between simulated and measured temperature at the maximum temperature rise location is calculated as 0.57°C. (Error values are averaged over all experiments.) CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic and thermal simulations were validated with experiments. Thermal effects of RF excitation at 10.5 Tesla with dipoles were investigated. Magn Reson Med 79:479-488, 2018.
PURPOSE: To validate electromagnetic and thermal simulations with in vivo temperature measurements, and to demonstrate a framework that can be used to predict temperature increase caused by radiofrequency (RF) excitation with dipole transmitter arrays. METHODS:Dipole arrays were used to deliver RF energy in the back/neck region of the swine using different RF excitation patterns (n = 2-4 per swine) for heating. The temperature in anesthetized swine (n = 3) was measured using fluoroscopic probes (n = 12) and compared against thermal modeling from animal-specific electromagnetic simulations. RESULTS: Simulated temperature curves were in agreement with the measured data. The root mean square error between simulated and measured temperature rise at all locations (at the end of each RF excitation) is calculated as 0.37°C. The mean experimental temperature rise at the maximum temperature rise locations (averaged over all experiments) is calculated as 2.89°C. The root mean square error between simulated and measured temperature at the maximum temperature rise location is calculated as 0.57°C. (Error values are averaged over all experiments.) CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic and thermal simulations were validated with experiments. Thermal effects of RF excitation at 10.5 Tesla with dipoles were investigated. Magn Reson Med 79:479-488, 2018.
Authors: Thomas Vaughan; Lance DelaBarre; Carl Snyder; Jinfeng Tian; Can Akgun; Devashish Shrivastava; Wanzahn Liu; Chris Olson; Gregor Adriany; John Strupp; Peter Andersen; Anand Gopinath; Pierre-Francois van de Moortele; Michael Garwood; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Devashish Shrivastava; Timothy Hanson; Robert Schlentz; William Gallaghar; Carl Snyder; Lance Delabarre; Surya Prakash; Paul Iaizzo; J Thomas Vaughan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gregory J Metzger; Carl Snyder; Can Akgun; Tommy Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bob van den Bergen; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Dennis W J Klomp; Jan J W Lagendijk Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christof Thalhammer; Wolfgang Renz; Lukas Winter; Fabian Hezel; Jan Rieger; Harald Pfeiffer; Andreas Graessl; Frank Seifert; Werner Hoffmann; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Valeriy Tkachenko; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Peter Kellman; Thoralf Niendorf Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Cem Murat Deniz; Ryan Brown; Riccardo Lattanzi; Leeor Alon; Daniel K Sodickson; Yudong Zhu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaotong Zhang; Sebastian Schmitter; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Jiaen Liu; Bin He Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Kawin Setsompop; Vijayanand Alagappan; Borjan Gagoski; Thomas Witzel; Jonathan Polimeni; Andreas Potthast; Franz Hebrank; Ulrich Fontius; Franz Schmitt; Lawrence L Wald; Elfar Adalsteinsson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 2.266