Literature DB >> 28365888

Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.

Beatrice Feragalli1, Osvaldo Rampado2, Cecilia Abate3, Monica Macrì1, Felice Festa1, Francesco Stromei4, Sergio Caputi1, Giuseppe Guglielmi5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate images quality and radiation doses of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for dental and maxillofacial imaging testing five different acquisition protocols.
METHODS: Dose measurements of different acquisition protocols were calculated for Pax Zenith three-dimensional (3D) Cone Beam (Vatech, Korea) and for conventional orthopantomography (OPT) and cephalometric skull imaging Ortophos (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany). The absorbed organ doses were measured using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters at 58 sites related to sensitive organs. Five different CBCT protocols were evaluated for image quality and radiation doses. They differed in FOV, image resolution, kVp, mA, acquisition time in seconds and radiation dose. Measurements were then carried out with the orthopantomograph. Equivalent and effective doses were calculated.
RESULTS: The reference protocol with large FOV, high resolution quality images, 95 kVp, 5 mA and acquisition time of 24 s resulted in a DAP value of 1556 mGy cm2 instead the protocol with reduced kVp from 95 to 80 kVp translated into a value of DAP inferior to 35% (from 1556 to 1013 mGy cm2). Going from a high resolution to a normal resolution, there was a reduction of the acquisition time to 15 s which allowed further dose reduction of approximately 40% (628 mGy cm2); this protocol resulted in a value of effective dose of 35 microSievert (μSv). Moreover, the effect of changing FOV has been evaluated, considering two scans with a reduced FOV (160 × 140  and 120 × 90 mm, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: CBCT low-dose protocol with large FOV, normal resolution quality images, 80 kVp, 5 mA and acquisition time of 15 s resulted in a value of effective dose of 35 microSievert (μSv). This protocol allows the study of maxillofacial region with high quality of images and a very low radiation dose and, therefore, could be proposed in selected case where a complete assessment of dental and maxillofacial region is useful for treatment planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); Dental imaging; Dose area product (DAP); In vitro phantom study; Low-dose protocol; Orthopantomography (OPT)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365888     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0758-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  14 in total

1.  Radiation dose in dental radiology.

Authors:  M Cohnen; J Kemper; O Möbes; J Pawelzik; U Mödder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.

Authors:  James K Mah; Robert A Danforth; Axel Bumann; David Hatcher
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-10

3.  Development of dento-maxillofacial cone beam X-ray computed tomography system.

Authors:  K Yamamoto; K Ueno; K Seo; D Shinohara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  K Tsiklakis; K Syriopoulos; H C Stamatakis
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.

Authors:  S Kapila; R S Conley; W E Harrell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material.

Authors:  K Honda; T A Larheim; K Maruhashi; K Matsumoto; K Iwai
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone beam-computed tomography.

Authors:  Akira Nakajima; Glenn T Sameshima; Yoshinori Arai; Yoshito Homme; Noriyoshi Shimizu; Harry Dougherty
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

10.  Radiochromic films for dental CT dosimetry: a feasibility study.

Authors:  O Rampado; S D Bianchi; A Peruzzo Cornetto; V Rossetti; R Ropolo
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.685

View more
  5 in total

1.  Buccal bone defects and transversal tooth movement of mandibular lateral segments in patients after orthodontic treatment with and without piezocision: A case-control retrospective study.

Authors:  Maria Antonia Alvarez; Alejandra Mejia; Daniela Alzate; Diego Rey; Marcos Ioshida; Juan Fernando Aristizabal; Hector F Rios; Wilhelm Bellaiza-Cantillo; Marcela Tirado; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghobee; Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Afshin Khorsand; Sanaz Mahmoudi; Sahar Chokami Rafiei
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-01

3.  Evaluation of mandibular calcification on 3D volume images.

Authors:  Barbara Schreiner-Tiefenbacher; Vivian Forster; Klaudio Pauli; Walter Sutter; Marius Meier; Henning Roland; Patrick Bandura; Dritan Turhani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-20

4.  A CBCT assessment of bone density changes after accelerated orthodontic retraction of canine by microosteoperforations.

Authors:  Ahmed Ali Alfawazan; Abhigyan Manas; Yohan Verghese; Anuraj Singh Kochhar; Abdul Majeed AlMogbel; Smita Patil
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 5.  Indications for 3-D diagnostics and navigation in dental implantology with the focus on radiation exposure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Burkhard Kunzendorf; Hendrik Naujokat; Jörg Wiltfang
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.