Literature DB >> 28365789

Single-scan rest/stress imaging: validation in a porcine model with 18F-Flurpiridaz.

Nicolas J Guehl1, Marc D Normandin1, Dustin W Wooten1, Guy Rozen2, Arkadiusk Sitek1, Jeremy Ruskin2, Timothy M Shoup1, Leon M Ptaszek1,2, Georges El Fakhri1, Nathaniel M Alpert3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: 18F-labeled myocardial flow agents are becoming available for clinical application but the ∼2 hour half-life of 18F complicates their clinical application for rest-stress measurements. The goal of this work is to evaluate in a pig model a single-scan method which provides quantitative rest-stress blood flow in less than 15 minutes.
METHODS: Single-scan rest-stress measurements were made using 18F-Flurpiridaz. Nine scans were performed in healthy pigs and seven scans were performed in injured pigs. A two-injection, single-scan protocol was used in which an adenosine infusion was started 4 minutes after the first injection of 18F-Flurpiridaz and followed either 3 or 6 minutes later by a second radiotracer injection. In two pigs, microsphere flow measurements were made at rest and during stress. Dynamic images were reoriented into the short axis view, and regions of interest (ROIs) for the 17 myocardial segments were defined in bull's eye fashion. PET data were fitted with MGH2, a kinetic model with time varying kinetic parameters, in which blood flow changes abruptly with the introduction of adenosine. Rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) were estimated simultaneously.
RESULTS: The first 12-14 minutes of rest-stress PET data were fitted in detail by the MGH2 model, yielding MBF measurement with a mean precision of 0.035 ml/min/cc. Mean myocardial blood flow across pigs was 0.61 ± 0.11 mL/min/cc at rest and 1.06 ± 0.19 mL/min/cc at stress in healthy pigs and 0.36 ± 0.20 mL/min/cc at rest and 0.62 ± 0.24 mL/min/cc at stress in the ischemic area. Good agreement was obtained with microsphere flow measurement (slope = 1.061 ± 0.017, intercept = 0.051 ± 0.017, mean difference 0.096 ± 0.18 ml/min/cc).
CONCLUSION: Accurate rest and stress blood flow estimation can be obtained in less than 15 min of PET acquisition. The method is practical and easy to implement suggesting the possibility of clinical translation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinetic modeling; Myocardial blood flow; Positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365789     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3684-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  26 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Novel F-18-labeled PET myocardial perfusion tracers: bench to bedside.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla; Antti Saraste
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine.

Authors:  J D Rossen; J E Quillen; A G Lopez; R G Stenberg; C L Talman; M D Winniford
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Phase I, first-in-human study of BMS747158, a novel 18F-labeled tracer for myocardial perfusion PET: dosimetry, biodistribution, safety, and imaging characteristics after a single injection at rest.

Authors:  Jamshid Maddahi; Johannes Czernin; Joel Lazewatsky; Sung-Cheng Huang; Magnus Dahlbom; Heinrich Schelbert; Richard Sparks; Alexander Ehlgen; Paul Crane; Qi Zhu; Marybeth Devine; Michael Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Single-scan rest∕stress imaging (18)F-labeled flow tracers.

Authors:  Nathaniel Alpert; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R E Stewart; M Schwaiger; E Molina; J Popma; G M Gacioch; M Kalus; S Squicciarini; Z R al-Aouar; A Schork; D E Kuhl
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Mechanism of uptake and retention of F-18 BMS-747158-02 in cardiomyocytes: a novel PET myocardial imaging agent.

Authors:  Padmaja Yalamanchili; Eric Wexler; Megan Hayes; Ming Yu; Jody Bozek; Mikhail Kagan; Heike S Radeke; Michael Azure; Ajay Purohit; David S Casebier; Simon P Robinson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with or without myocardial ischemia using dynamic flurpiridaz F 18 PET.

Authors:  René R S Packard; Sung-Cheng Huang; Magnus Dahlbom; Johannes Czernin; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Coronary risk factors and myocardial blood flow in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: a quantitative [15O]H2O PET/CT study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; Yolande E Appelman; Hendrik J Harms; Stefan de Haan; Mijntje L P van den Oever; Cornelis van Kuijk; Cornelis P Allaart; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Mark Lubberink; Albert C van Rossum; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Patrick Martineau; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Rapid computation of single PET scan rest-stress myocardial blood flow parametric images by table look up.

Authors:  Nicolas J Guehl; Marc D Normandin; Dustin W Wooten; Guy Rozen; Jeremy N Ruskin; Timothy M Shoup; Jonghye Woo; Leon M Ptaszek; Georges El Fakhri; Nathaniel M Alpert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Searching for novel PET radiotracers: imaging cardiac perfusion, metabolism and inflammation.

Authors:  Caitlund Q Davidson; Christopher P Phenix; T C Tai; Neelam Khaper; Simon J Lees
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-05

4.  Joint reconstruction of rest/stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  X Lai; Y Petibon; G El Fakhri; J Ouyang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Preclinical Validation of a Single-Scan Rest/Stress Imaging Technique for 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography Cardiac Perfusion Studies.

Authors:  Nicolas J Guehl; Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Dustin W Wooten; J Luis Guerrero; Aurélie Kas; Marc D Normandin; Georges El Fakhri; Nathaniel M Alpert
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia With Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Jae Ho Sohn; Spencer C Behr; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.528

7.  Added value of myocardial blood flow using 18F-flurpiridaz PET to diagnose coronary artery disease: The flurpiridaz 301 trial.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Edward P Ficaro; Jonathan B Moody; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; Tomoe Hagio; Christopher Buckley; Richard L Weinberg; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Moving into the next era of PET myocardial perfusion imaging: introduction of novel 18F-labeled tracers.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Xinyu Chen; Steven P Rowe; Constantin Lapa; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.