Literature DB >> 21849402

Phase I, first-in-human study of BMS747158, a novel 18F-labeled tracer for myocardial perfusion PET: dosimetry, biodistribution, safety, and imaging characteristics after a single injection at rest.

Jamshid Maddahi1, Johannes Czernin, Joel Lazewatsky, Sung-Cheng Huang, Magnus Dahlbom, Heinrich Schelbert, Richard Sparks, Alexander Ehlgen, Paul Crane, Qi Zhu, Marybeth Devine, Michael Phelps.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: (18)F-labeled BMS747158 is a novel myocardial perfusion imaging tracer that targets mitochondrial complex 1. The objectives of this phase I study were to evaluate radiation dosimetry, biodistribution, human safety, tolerability, and early elimination of (18)F activity in urine after injection of a single dose of the tracer at rest in healthy subjects.
METHODS: Thirteen healthy subjects were injected with 170-244 MBq (4.6-6.6 mCi) of BMS747158 intravenously. Dynamic PET was obtained over the heart for 10 min, followed by sequential whole-body imaging for 5 h. Blood samples and urinary excretion were collected for up to 8 h. Heart rate, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure were monitored before and during imaging. The residence times were determined from multiexponential regression of organ region-of-interest data normalized by injected dose. Absorbed dose estimates for all target organs were determined using MIRD schema with OLINDA/EXM software.
RESULTS: The organ receiving the largest mean absorbed dose was the kidneys at 0.066 mSv/MBq (0.24 rem/mCi), followed by the heart wall at 0.048 mSv/MBq (0.18 rem/mCi). The mean effective dose was 0.019 mSv/MBq (0.072 rem/mCi). The heart exhibited high and sustained retention of BMS747158 from the earliest images through approximately 5 h after injection. There were no drug-related adverse events, and the tracer was well tolerated in all subjects. Mean urinary excretion was 4.83 percentage injected dose (range, 0.64-12.41 percentage injected dose).
CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that (18)F-labeled BMS747158 appears to be well tolerated and has a unique potential for myocardial perfusion PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849402     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  48 in total

Review 1.  Practical issues regarding the incorporation of PET into a busy SPECT practice.

Authors:  Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Advances in clinical application of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Antti Saraste
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Chunlei Han; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Cardiac PET for translational imaging.

Authors:  C Rischpler; Anna Paschali; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; S G Nekolla
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Proceedings of the ASNC cardiac PET summit meeting, May 12, 2014, Baltimore MD : 5. Advances in radiopharmaceutical availability and development of cardiac PET tracers.

Authors:  Manuel Cerqueira; James Case; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  PET should replace SPECT in cardiac imaging for diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD: Pro.

Authors:  Jamshid Maddahi; René R Sevag Packard
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  New chemical and radiochemical routes to [18F]Rho6G-DEG-F, a delocalized lipophilic cation for myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  J A H Inkster; S Zhang; V Akurathi; A Belanger; S Dubey; T Treves; A B Packard
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.597

8.  Coronary vascular dysfunction and prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Masanao Naya; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Mariya Gaber; Sharmila Dorbala; David M Charytan; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

Review 9.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Erick Alexanderson; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2013-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.