Literature DB >> 28364429

Patient-Reported Usability of Positive Airway Pressure Equipment Is Associated With Adherence in Older Adults.

Constance H Fung1,2, Jennifer L Martin1,2, Ron D Hays2, Emily S Patterson3, Ravi Aysola2, Nananda Col4, Michael N Mitchell1, Cindy Truong1, Joseph M Dzierzewski1,5, Stella Jouldjian1, Yeonsu Song1,2, Juan Carlos Rodriguez2,6, Karen Josephson1, Cathy Alessi1,2.   

Abstract

Study objectives: To examine the usability of positive airway pressure (PAP) devices and its association with PAP adherence among older adults with sleep-disordered breathing.
Methods: We mailed questionnaires to patients aged ≥65 years prescribed PAP therapy during the prior 36 months from two large healthcare systems. Survey participants completed the Usability of Sleep Apnea Equipment-Positive Airway Pressure (USE-PAP) questionnaire, which assessed the usability of their PAP device. Other questionnaire items included demographics and self-rated health. We also abstracted adherence data (mean nightly hours of PAP use available from one site) and interface type from the electronic health record.
Results: Five hundred sixty-four patients completed the survey (response rate = 33%). The mean USE-PAP score (0 = best to 100 = worst) was 20 (SD ± 20). Mean duration of PAP use (available in 189 respondents) was 5.2 hours per night (SD ± 2.0). In a nested regression model predicting nightly hours of PAP use, a 10-point (0.5 SD) increase in USE-PAP score corresponded to a 0.37 hour/night reduction in PAP use. The model including the USE-PAP score explained a significant proportion (R2 = 15%) of the variation in nightly hours of PAP use above and beyond demographics, self-reported health, and interface type (∆R2 = 12%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that PAP usability varies among older patients and is associated with PAP adherence, above and beyond other predictors of adherence. These results support measuring and improving PAP usability to further improve PAP adherence for older patients. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society (SRS) 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; predictive modeling.; sleep apnea; usability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28364429      PMCID: PMC5806579          DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsx007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  13 in total

1.  U.S. General Population Estimate for "Excellent" to "Poor" Self-Rated Health Item.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Karen L Spritzer; William W Thompson; David Cella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions.

Authors:  Amy M Sawyer; Nalaka S Gooneratne; Carole L Marcus; Dafna Ofer; Kathy C Richards; Terri E Weaver
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 11.609

3.  Human factors/usability barriers to home medical devices among individuals with disabling conditions: in-depth interviews with positive airway pressure device users.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Uyi Igodan; Cathy Alessi; Jennifer L Martin; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Karen Josephson; B Josea Kramer
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.554

4.  Development of the Usability of Sleep Apnea Equipment-Positive Airway Pressure (USE-PAP) questionnaire.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Ron D Hays; Juan Carlos Rodriguez; Uyi Igodan; Stella Jouldjian; Joseph M Dzierzewski; B Josea Kramer; Karen Josephson; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  The association between difficulty using positive airway pressure equipment and adherence to therapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Uyi Igodan; Stella Jouldjian; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Apnea burden: efficacy versus effectiveness in patients using positive airway pressure.

Authors:  Matt T Bianchi; Yvonne Alameddine; James Mojica
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Predicting mortality and healthcare utilization with a single question.

Authors:  Karen B DeSalvo; Vincent S Fan; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Determinants of nasal CPAP compliance.

Authors:  Carl J Stepnowsky; Matthew R Marler; Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

Authors:  Lawrence J Epstein; David Kristo; Patrick J Strollo; Norman Friedman; Atul Malhotra; Susheel P Patil; Kannan Ramar; Robert Rogers; Richard J Schwab; Edward M Weaver; Michael D Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Compliance with nasal CPAP in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  P Collard; T Pieters; G Aubert; P Delguste; D O Rodenstein
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Short- and long-term continuous positive airway pressure usage in the post-stroke population with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Tetyana Kendzerska; Kelly Wilton; Russell Bahar; Clodagh M Ryan
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.816

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.