Constance H Fung1, Uyi Igodan2, Cathy Alessi3, Jennifer L Martin3, Joseph M Dzierzewski3, Karen Josephson2, B Josea Kramer3. 1. David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 16111 Plummer Street (11E), North Hills, CA 91343, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (11E), North Hills, CA 91343, USA. Electronic address: Connie.Fung@va.gov. 2. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (11E), North Hills, CA 91343, USA. 3. David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 16111 Plummer Street (11E), North Hills, CA 91343, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (11E), North Hills, CA 91343, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that medical equipment often fails to accommodate the needs of individuals with disabling conditions. Few studies have focused on the accessibility of home medical devices such as positive airway pressure (PAP), which is a type of home medical equipment prescribed for long-term therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore in detail the types of difficulties experienced by patients with physical/sensory impairments who use PAP devices, as an initial step in designing a questionnaire to survey users about this topic. METHODS: In this descriptive study, in-depth interviews were conducted with 19 participants (9 patients with physical/sensory impairment and 10 health care providers). Interviews were coded and analyzed for major topics. RESULTS: Participants detailed the numerous ways in which current PAP devices fail to meet the needs of individuals with physical/sensory impairments (e.g., tremor, poor depth perception, paresis), by requiring patients to perform manually difficult tasks, such as inserting PAP parts through small apertures, attaching parts using a twisting motion, and lifting arms overhead to apply PAP headgear. These demands contributed to patients' frustration with and reduced usage of the home medical device. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that home medical devices such as PAP may not be currently designed to meet the needs of some users with physical/sensory impairments. Additional studies are needed to measure the prevalence and impact of impairment-related barriers on PAP adherence for this common medical equipment. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that medical equipment often fails to accommodate the needs of individuals with disabling conditions. Few studies have focused on the accessibility of home medical devices such as positive airway pressure (PAP), which is a type of home medical equipment prescribed for long-term therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore in detail the types of difficulties experienced by patients with physical/sensory impairments who use PAP devices, as an initial step in designing a questionnaire to survey users about this topic. METHODS: In this descriptive study, in-depth interviews were conducted with 19 participants (9 patients with physical/sensory impairment and 10 health care providers). Interviews were coded and analyzed for major topics. RESULTS:Participants detailed the numerous ways in which current PAP devices fail to meet the needs of individuals with physical/sensory impairments (e.g., tremor, poor depth perception, paresis), by requiring patients to perform manually difficult tasks, such as inserting PAP parts through small apertures, attaching parts using a twisting motion, and lifting arms overhead to apply PAP headgear. These demands contributed to patients' frustration with and reduced usage of the home medical device. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that home medical devices such as PAP may not be currently designed to meet the needs of some users with physical/sensory impairments. Additional studies are needed to measure the prevalence and impact of impairment-related barriers on PAP adherence for this common medical equipment. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Anders Broström; Kristofer Franzén Arestedt; Per Nilsen; Anna Strömberg; Martin Ulander; Eva Svanborg Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Fernanda R Almeida; Natalie Henrich; Carlo Marra; Larry D Lynd; Alan A Lowe; Hiroko Tsuda; John A Fleetham; Benjamin Pliska; Najib Ayas Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Miguel-Angel Martínez-García; Francisco Campos-Rodríguez; Pablo Catalán-Serra; Juan-José Soler-Cataluña; Carmen Almeida-Gonzalez; Ines De la Cruz Morón; Joaquin Durán-Cantolla; Josep-Maria Montserrat Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sara C Keller; Ayse P Gurses; Nicole Werner; Dawn Hohl; Ashley Hughes; Bruce Leff; Alicia I Arbaje Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Ron D Hays; Juan Carlos Rodriguez; Uyi Igodan; Stella Jouldjian; Joseph M Dzierzewski; B Josea Kramer; Karen Josephson; Cathy Alessi Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Ron D Hays; Emily S Patterson; Ravi Aysola; Nananda Col; Michael N Mitchell; Cindy Truong; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Stella Jouldjian; Yeonsu Song; Juan Carlos Rodriguez; Karen Josephson; Cathy Alessi Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849