Literature DB >> 25441743

Apnea burden: efficacy versus effectiveness in patients using positive airway pressure.

Matt T Bianchi1, Yvonne Alameddine2, James Mojica3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern continuous positive airway pressure (PAP) machines track hours of use and residual respiratory events while on treatment. A substantial portion of sleep apnea patients are partially compliant, emphasizing the need to distinguish between PAP efficacy and PAP effectiveness in chronic management of patients with sleep apnea.
METHODS: We used a combination of three data sources to estimate the sleep apnea burden in a convenience cohort of PAP users from our clinics that were compliant based on Medicare criteria: self-reported habitual total sleep time, and PAP usage times with residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from compliance downloads.
RESULTS: Assuming that the off-PAP time consists of baseline AHI severity, an estimated apnea burden was calculated to estimate PAP effectiveness. Whereas 70% of patients in our cohort showed machine AHI values <5/h, the apnea burden calculations revealed that only one-third of patients are predicted to have an effective AHI <5.
CONCLUSION: Estimating PAP effectiveness through the concept of apnea burden has implications for clinical care as well as research trials.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apnea burden; Compliance; Effectiveness; Efficacy; Management

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441743     DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Med        ISSN: 1389-9457            Impact factor:   3.492


  8 in total

1.  Urgent Need to Improve PAP Management: The Devil Is in Two (Fixable) Details.

Authors:  Robert J Thomas; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Sleepiness and Driving: Multidimensional Legal, Social, Technological, and Biological Challenges.

Authors:  Robert Joseph Thomas
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Gastric Banding Surgery versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jessie P Bakker; Ali Tavakkoli; Michael Rueschman; Wei Wang; Robert Andrews; Atul Malhotra; Robert L Owens; Amit Anand; Katherine A Dudley; Sanjay R Patel
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Patient-Reported Usability of Positive Airway Pressure Equipment Is Associated With Adherence in Older Adults.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Ron D Hays; Emily S Patterson; Ravi Aysola; Nananda Col; Michael N Mitchell; Cindy Truong; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Stella Jouldjian; Yeonsu Song; Juan Carlos Rodriguez; Karen Josephson; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of nasal surgery to increase continuous positive airway pressure adherence in sleep apnea patients with nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Judith S Kempfle; Nicholas Y BuSaba; John M Dobrowski; Michael B Westover; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Standardized framework to report on the role of sleeping position in sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  M J L Ravesloot; P E Vonk; J T Maurer; A Oksenberg; N de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 7.  Sleep Disturbances as a Risk Factor for Stroke.

Authors:  Dae Lim Koo; Hyunwoo Nam; Robert J Thomas; Chang-Ho Yun
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.967

8.  A novel adhesive biosensor system for detecting respiration, cardiac, and limb movement signals during sleep: validation with polysomnography.

Authors:  Elise Jortberg; Ikaro Silva; Viprali Bhatkar; Ryan S McGinnis; Ellora Sen-Gupta; Briana Morey; John A Wright; Jesus Pindado; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2018-11-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.