Literature DB >> 7737074

Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial.

M W Kreuter1, V J Strecher.   

Abstract

We sought to identify and correct inaccurate perceptions of risk among 1,317 adult patients in a primary care setting. Patients' perceived risks of heart attack, stroke, cancer, and motor vehicle crash were assessed and compared with a measure of risk derived from a health risk appraisal. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive computer-generated individualized risk feedback, risk feedback plus behavioral change feedback, or no feedback. Changes in perceived risk from baseline to a 6-month follow-up were compared across study groups. Results showed that individualized risk feedback was effective in increasing perceived stroke risk among patients who had underestimated their stroke risk at baseline and in reducing perceived risk of cancer among patients who had overestimated their cancer risk at baseline. Individualized risk feedback did not alter patients' perception of their heart attack and motor vehicle crash risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7737074     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.1.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  60 in total

1.  Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk does not Enhance Participation in Screening.

Authors:  Keith Dear; Leitha Scott; Sharon Chambers; Mike C Corbett; Doug Taupin
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Risk perception and smoking behavior in medically ill smokers: a prospective study.

Authors:  Belinda Borrelli; Rashelle B Hayes; Shira Dunsiger; Joseph L Fava
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Personalized Multi-Condition Risk Assessment in Primary Care.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Heather J Baer; Katyuska Eibensteiner; Elissa V Klinger; Stella St Hubert; George Getty; Phyllis Brawarsky; E John Orav; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; David W Bates; Graham Colditz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The Most Natural Tobacco Used: A Qualitative Investigation of Young Adult Smokers' Risk Perceptions of Flavored Little Cigars and Cigarillos.

Authors:  Kymberle L Sterling; Craig S Fryer; Pebbles Fagan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Taking Stock of Unrealistic Optimism.

Authors:  James A Shepperd; William M P Klein; Erika A Waters; Neil D Weinstein
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07

6.  Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; B K Rimer; P R Lyna; A A Pradhan; M Conaway; C T Woods-Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-12

7.  Using disease risk estimates to guide risk factor interventions: field test of a patient workbook for self-assessing coronary risk.

Authors:  J Michael Paterson; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; C David Naylor
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.

Authors:  Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The impact of personalized risk feedback on Mexican Americans' perceived risk for heart disease and diabetes.

Authors:  Shelly R Hovick; Anna V Wilkinson; Sato Ashida; Hendrik D de Heer; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-01-24

10.  Individuals' responses to global CHD risk: a focus group study.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy Behrend; Maihan B Vu; Andrea Meier; Jennifer M Griffith; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.