Literature DB >> 20841391

Five-year and lifetime risk of breast cancer among U.S. subpopulations: implications for magnetic resonance imaging screening.

Barry I Graubard1, Andrew N Freedman, Mitchell H Gail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines from the American Cancer Society recommend annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening for women with a projected lifetime risk of ≥20% based on risk models that use family history. Because MRI screening is costly and has limited specificity, estimates of the numbers of U.S. women with ≥20% breast cancer risk would be useful.
METHODS: We used data from the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (i.e., Gail model 2 with a revision for African Americans) to calculate estimates of U.S. women by age and race/ethnicity categories with a lifetime absolute breast cancer risk of ≥20%. Distributions of 5-year and lifetime absolute risk of breast cancer were compared across demographic groups.
RESULTS: We estimated that 1.09% (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.24%) of women age 30 to 84 years have a lifetime absolute breast cancer risk of ≥20%, which translates to 880,063 U.S. women eligible for MRI screening. The 5-year risks are highest for white non-Hispanics and lowest for Hispanics. The lifetime risks decrease with age and are generally highest for white non-Hispanics, lower for African American non-Hispanic, and lowest for Hispanics.
CONCLUSION: We provide national estimates of the number of U.S. women who would be eligible for MRI breast screening and distributions of 5-year and lifetime risks of breast cancer using the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. IMPACT: These estimates inform the potential resources and public health demand for MRI screening and chemopreventive interventions that might be required for U.S. women. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20841391      PMCID: PMC2952062          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  24 in total

1.  Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention.

Authors:  B Rockhill; D Spiegelman; C Byrne; D J Hunter; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models.

Authors:  Eitan Amir; Orit C Freedman; Bostjan Seruga; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Application of breast cancer risk prediction models in clinical practice.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Andrea Eisen; Kathleen Calzone; Jill Stopfer; Anne Blackwood; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Limitations of the Gail model in the specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic.

Authors:  David M Euhus; A Marilyn Leitch; James F Huth; George N Peters
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The calculation of breast cancer risk for women with a first degree family history of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E B Claus; N Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; G A Colditz; D Hunter; E Hertzmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme.

Authors:  E Amir; D G Evans; A Shenton; F Lalloo; A Moran; C Boggis; M Wilson; A Howell
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history.

Authors:  M L Bondy; E D Lustbader; S Halabi; E Ross; V G Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  9 in total

1.  Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Stephanie L Fowler; William M P Klein; Linda Ball; Jaclyn McGuire; Graham A Colditz; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  The risk of developing invasive breast cancer in Hispanic women : a look across Hispanic subgroups.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Mei Leng; Barry I Graubard; Leo S Morales
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Breast MRI use uncommon among U.S. women.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; A Blythe Ryerson; Stephen Taplin; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Results from a randomized trial of a web-based, tailored decision aid for women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Jennifer B McClure; William E Barlow; Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Sarah M Greene; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-08

5.  Travel Burden to Breast MRI and Utilization: Are Risk and Sociodemographics Related?

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Christoph I Lee; David Benkeser; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jennifer S Haas; Anna N A Tosteson; Deirdre Hill; Xun Shi; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Bianca Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Claire C Conley; Travis Gerke; Richard Roetzheim; Jennifer Garcia; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Risk Assessment for Breast Cancer Development and Its Clinical Impact on Screening Performance in Iranian Women.

Authors:  Maryam Nikpour; Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki; Afsaneh Bakhtiari
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Assessment of the Risk of Breast Cancer Development Applying NCI Tool among Iraqi Women.

Authors:  Zainab Abbas Al Talebi; Seenaa Kadhum Ali; Zinah Kadhim Kareem; Dhafer A F Al-Koofee
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-10-01

9.  The Sister Study Cohort: Baseline Methods and Participant Characteristics.

Authors:  Dale P Sandler; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Sandra L Deming-Halverson; Paula S Juras; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Lourdes M Suarez; Cynthia A Kleeberger; David L Shore; Lisa A DeRoo; Jack A Taylor; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.