| Literature DB >> 33046450 |
Erika A Waters1, Jennifer M Taber2, Amy McQueen3, Ashley J Housten3, Jamie L Studts4,5, Laura D Scherer4.
Abstract
Cancer risk prediction models such as those published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention are a cornerstone of precision medicine and public health efforts to improve population health outcomes by tailoring preventive strategies and therapeutic treatments to the people who are most likely to benefit. However, there are several barriers to the effective translation, dissemination, and implementation of cancer risk prediction models into clinical and public health practice. In this commentary, we discuss two broad categories of barriers. Specifically, we assert that the successful use of risk-stratified cancer prevention and treatment strategies is particularly unlikely if risk prediction models are translated into risk assessment tools that (i) are difficult for the public to understand or (ii) are not structured in a way to engender the public's confidence that the results are accurate. We explain what aspects of a risk assessment tool's design and content may impede understanding and acceptance by the public. We also describe strategies for translating a cancer risk prediction model into a cancer risk assessment tool that is accessible, meaningful, and useful for the public and in clinical practice. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33046450 PMCID: PMC8170537 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ISSN: 1055-9965 Impact factor: 4.254