Literature DB >> 28356472

Task-dependent vestibular feedback responses in reaching.

Johannes Keyser1, W Pieter Medendorp2, Luc P J Selen2.   

Abstract

When reaching for an earth-fixed object during self-rotation, the motor system should appropriately integrate vestibular signals and sensory predictions to compensate for the intervening motion and its induced inertial forces. While it is well established that this integration occurs rapidly, it is unknown whether vestibular feedback is specifically processed dependent on the behavioral goal. Here, we studied whether vestibular signals evoke fixed responses with the aim to preserve the hand trajectory in space or are processed more flexibly, correcting trajectories only in task-relevant spatial dimensions. We used galvanic vestibular stimulation to perturb reaching movements toward a narrow or a wide target. Results show that the same vestibular stimulation led to smaller trajectory corrections to the wide than the narrow target. We interpret this reduced compensation as a task-dependent modulation of vestibular feedback responses, tuned to minimally intervene with the task-irrelevant dimension of the reach. These task-dependent vestibular feedback corrections are in accordance with a central prediction of optimal feedback control theory and mirror the sophistication seen in feedback responses to mechanical and visual perturbations of the upper limb.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Correcting limb movements for external perturbations is a hallmark of flexible sensorimotor behavior. While visual and mechanical perturbations are corrected in a task-dependent manner, it is unclear whether a vestibular perturbation, naturally arising when the body moves, is selectively processed in reach control. We show, using galvanic vestibular stimulation, that reach corrections to vestibular perturbations are task dependent, consistent with a prediction of optimal feedback control theory.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback control; galvanic vestibular stimulation; minimum intervention principle; vestibulomotor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28356472      PMCID: PMC5494373          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00112.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  On-line versus off-line vestibular-evoked control of goal-directed arm movements.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Jean Blouin; Fabrice Sarlegna; Christophe Bourdin; Jean-Louis Vercher; Gabriel M Gauthier
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Influence of the behavioral goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses.

Authors:  Joseph Y Nashed; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Prediction in the Vestibular Control of Arm Movements.

Authors:  Jean Blouin; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Etienne Guillaud; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.286

5.  Insights into the control of arm movement during body motion as revealed by EMG analyses.

Authors:  Jean Blouin; Etienne Guillaud; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Michel Guerraz; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The long-latency reflex is composed of at least two functionally independent processes.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Isaac Kurtzer; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Postural adjustments for online corrections of arm movements in standing humans.

Authors:  Julia A Leonard; Valeriya Gritsenko; Ryan Ouckama; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Visually-guided correction of hand reaching movements: The neurophysiological bases in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  P S Archambault; S Ferrari-Toniolo; R Caminiti; A Battaglia-Mayer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Vestibular contribution to the planning of reach trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher J Bockisch; Thomas Haslwanter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target.

Authors:  Margot M Veerman; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  Visual Feedback Processing of the Limb Involves Two Distinct Phases.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; Tyler Cluff; Tomohiko Takei; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  State Estimation for Early Feedback Responses in Reaching: Intramodal or Multimodal?

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Is the manual following response an attempt to compensate for inferred self-motion?

Authors:  Yajie Zhang; Eli Brenner; Jacques Duysens; Sabine Verschueren; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Task-dependent responses to muscle vibration during reaching.

Authors:  Johannes Keyser; Rob E F S Ramakers; W Pieter Medendorp; Luc P J Selen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Two Neural Circuits to Point Towards Home Position After Passive Body Displacements.

Authors:  Jean Blouin; Anahid H Saradjian; Jean-Philippe Pialasse; Gerome A Manson; Laurence Mouchnino; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Continuous Tracking of Task Parameters Tunes Reaching Control Online.

Authors:  Antoine De Comite; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-07-22

7.  Hierarchical Integration of Communicative and Spatial Perspective-Taking Demands in Sensorimotor Control of Referential Pointing.

Authors:  Rui 睿 Liu 刘; Sara Bögels; Geoffrey Bird; W Pieter Medendorp; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.